What I’m just thinking about right now, is, how big a fukking idiot does Comey feel like realizing all this shyt Mueller has/is getting, this is all shyt that Comey should have already been had. He is one of the most ineffective fukking idiots we have ever had as a fbi director, for fukking real. All of these directors and department heads in IC during this past presidential election dropped the fukking ball, BIGLY. The most important job they have, even bigger than preventing terrorist attacks, is PRESERVING OUR DEMOCRACY. I’m not saying this fukkface of a president is going to do away with our democracy, I think he will do A LOT of damage, but this too will pass, but, we all saw how easy it was for him to grasp power. With how far right the “grand ole party” is going, who’s to say The next crazy won’t?
RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
Educated guess though...:imweak44:
Jhoon
Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
He believed the hype about himself.
Even today he doesn’t come across as a guy who was a well placed moron. He really believes he’s a good guy.
He called a press conference over duplicated emails.
You're forgetting that the NY FBI office had a leak about Weiner...
Comey's hand was forced in a way...
I think he is infinitely better than Whitaker and the sycophants over at the NYFO, but at the end of the day, he had tunnel vision , and was far more concerned about protecting his agency 1st, himself 2nd, not sure where on the list, if even on the list, democracy was.
resurrection
By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Do War
Yeah the "Trumplandia" agents were essentially holding Comey hostage. He didn't have much a choice. I wish he wouldn't have done what he did, but I'm not sure what the alternative was.
Imagine a SMART, charismatic republican with Trump's aspirations and moral compass.. could be the end of the USA as we know it
Yeah this Mueller investigation only exposed more what a clown Comey was.. I wish Obama had not tapped him to be the director.. but given partisanship Obama picked him as a republican to appease the gop lead senate.. when the Dems has both houses under Obama he should have picked a Democrate to be fbi director.. he wouldn’t have pulled that shyt Comey pulled 2 weeks before the election
MANAFORT GOT ANSWERS AND INTEL ON MUELLER'S INVESTIGATION BACK TO TRUMP!
THIS MAY HAVE BEEN WHAT GOT MANAFORT PINCHED! MUELLER CAUGHT THEM IN A LIE KNOWING TRUMP WOULD PROPEL THE UNIFIED DEFENSE!
MANAFORT GAVE UP THE GOODS TO TRUMP ON WHAT MUELLER WAS ASKING WHICH IS UNUSUAL FOR PEOPLE WHO TAKE PLEA DEALS. MANAFORT IS TAKING THE HEAT FOR TRUMP!
Manafort’s Lawyer Said to Brief Trump Attorneys on What He Told Mueller
Manafort’s Lawyer Said to Brief Trump Attorneys on What He Told Mueller
Nov. 27, 2018
Prosecutors from the special counsel’s office have said that Paul Manafort breached his plea agreement by lying to them after he agreed to cooperate with their inquiry.Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press
WASHINGTON — A lawyer for Paul Manafort, the president’s onetime campaign chairman, repeatedly briefed President Trump’s lawyers on his client’s discussions with federal investigators after Mr. Manafort agreed to cooperate with the special counsel, according to one of Mr. Trump’s lawyers and two other people familiar with the conversations.
The arrangement was highly unusual and inflamed tensions with Mr. Mueller’s office when prosecutors discovered it after Mr. Manafort began cooperating two months ago, the people said. Some legal experts speculated that it was a bid by Mr. Manafort for a presidential pardon even as he worked with the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, in hopes of a lighter sentence.
Rudolph W. Giuliani, one of the president’s personal lawyers, acknowledged the arrangement on Tuesday and defended it as a source of valuable insights into the special counsel’s inquiry and where it was headed. Such information could help shape a legal defense strategy, and it also appeared to give Mr. Trump and his legal advisers ammunition in their public relations campaign against the special counsel’s office.
For example, Mr. Giuliani said, Mr. Manafort’s lawyer Kevin M. Downing told him that prosecutors hammered away at whether the president knew about the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting where Russians promised to deliver damaging information on Hillary Clinton to his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr. The president has long denied knowing about the meeting in advance. “He wants Manafort to incriminate Trump,” Mr. Giuliani declared of Mr. Mueller.
While Mr. Downing’s discussions with the president’s team violated no laws, they helped contribute to a deteriorating relationship between lawyers for Mr. Manafort and Mr. Mueller’s prosecutors, who accused Mr. Manafort of holding out on them despite his pledge to assist them in any matter they deemed relevant, according to the people. That conflict spilled into public view on Monday when the prosecutors took the rare step of declaring that Mr. Manafort had breached his plea agreement by lying to them about a variety of subjects.
Mr. Manafort’s lawyers insisted that their client had been truthful but acknowledged that the two sides were at an impasse. Mr. Manafort will now face sentencing on two conspiracy charges and eight counts of financial fraud — crimes that could put him behind bars for at least 10 years.
Mr. Downing did not respond to a request for comment. Though it was unclear how frequently he spoke to Mr. Trump’s lawyers or how much he revealed, his updates helped reassure Mr. Trump’s legal team that Mr. Manafort had not implicated the president in any possible wrongdoing.
Kevin Downing, a lawyer for Mr. Manafort, has been in contact with President Trump’s lawyers.Al Drago for The New York Times
Mr. Giuliani, who has taken an aggressive posture against the Russia investigation since Mr. Trump hired him in April, seized on Mr. Downing’s information to unleash lines of attack onto the special counsel.
In asserting that investigators were unnecessarily targeting Mr. Trump, Mr. Giuliani accused the prosecutor overseeing the Manafort investigation, Andrew Weissmann, of keeping Mr. Manafort in solitary confinement simply in the hopes of forcing him to give false testimony about the president.
But detention officials decide whether inmates serve in solitary confinement, according to law enforcement officials, and allies of Mr. Manafort have said he is there for his own safety.
A spokesman for Mr. Mueller’s office declined to comment. Mr. Weissmann is a longtime senior Justice Department prosecutor who specializes in prosecuting financial crimes and turning defendants into cooperating witnesses. His aggressive nature has earned him two competing reputations: Prosecutors view him as a relentless investigator who has overseen some of the Justice Department’s most complex investigations, but some defense lawyers say he is overly combative and will bend the facts to gain a conviction.
In his own recent Twitter attacks on the special counsel, the president seemed to imply that he had inside information about the prosecutors’ lines of inquiry and frustrations. “Wait until it comes out how horribly & viciously they are treating people, ruining lives for them refusing to lie,” Mr. Trump wrote on Tuesday.
Earlier this month, he tweeted: “The inner workings of the Mueller investigation are a total mess. They have found no collusion and have gone absolutely nuts. They are screaming and shouting at people, horribly threatening them to come up with the answers they want.”
Mr. Manafort’s legal team had long kept Mr. Trump’s lawyers abreast of developments in his case under a joint defense agreement. Mr. Trump’s team has pursued such pacts as a way to monitor the special counsel’s inquiry. Mr. Giuliani said last month that the president’s lawyers had agreements with lawyers for 32 witnesses or subjects of Mr. Mueller’s 18-month-old investigation.
Defense lawyers involved in investigations with multiple witnesses often form such alliances so they can share information without running afoul of attorney-client privilege rules. But when one defendant decides to cooperate with the government in a plea deal, that defense lawyer typically pulls out rather than antagonize the prosecutors who can influence the client’s sentence. For instance, a lawyer for the president’s former national security adviser Michael T. Flynn withdrew last year from such an agreement with Mr. Trump’s lawyers before pleading guilty to a felony offense and agreeing to help the special counsel.
Mr. Manafort’s lawyers, on the other hand, maintained their joint defense agreement with the president’s legal team even after Mr. Manafort pleaded guilty to two conspiracy counts in September and began answering questions in at least a dozen sessions with the special counsel.
Even if the pact was mostly informal at that point, law enforcement experts said it was still highly unusual for Mr. Manafort’s lawyers to keep up such contacts once their client had pledged to help the prosecutors in hope of a lighter punishment for his crimes.
Mr. Manafort must have wanted to keep a line open to the president in hope of a pardon, said Barbara McQuade, a former United States attorney who now teaches law at University of Michigan. “I’m not able to think of another reason,” she said.
If Mr. Manafort wanted to stay on the prosecutors’ good side, “it would make no sense for him to continue to share information with other subjects of the investigation,” said Chuck Rosenberg, a former United States attorney and senior F.B.I. official. He added: “He is either all in or all out with respect to cooperation. Typically, there is no middle ground.”
In another development on Tuesday, Mr. Manafort categorically denied a report in The Guardian claiming that he met with Julian Assange, the head of WikiLeaks, around the time he joined the Trump campaign in the spring of 2016. Mr. Mueller’s team has been investigating whether any associates of Mr. Trump conspired with Moscow’s operation to influence the presidential election with documents stolen from Democratic computers and distributed by WikiLeaks.
“This story is totally false and deliberately libelous. I have never met Julian Assange or anyone connected to him. I have never been contacted by anyone connected to WikiLeaks, either directly or indirectly. I have never reached out to Assange or WikiLeaks on any matter,” Mr. Manafort said in a statement released by his spokesman. He said he was considering legal action against the newspaper. WikiLeaks said on Twitter that Mr. Assange planned to sue the newspaper for libel over the article, which The New York Times did not independently confirm.
Last year, a lawyer for Mr. Trump broached the idea of presidential pardons to lawyers for both Mr. Manafort and Mr. Flynn as prosecutors were building cases against both men, according to people familiar with the conversations. The lawyer, John Dowd, who later resigned from the president’s team, denied ever raising the prospect of a pardon.
But later, Mr. Giuliani suggested that Mr. Manafort and others might be eligible for pardons after Mr. Mueller’s inquiry ends, and the prospect has continued to hover over Mr. Manafort’s case. On Tuesday, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, said she had no knowledge of any conversations about a pardon for Mr. Manafort. A week ago, after months of negotiations, Mr. Trump provided written answers to some questions from Mr. Mueller.
Some defense lawyers have suggested that prosecutors deliberately fashioned Mr. Manafort’s plea agreement to counter a possible pardon. In forcing Mr. Manafort to forfeit almost all his wealth, including five homes, various bank accounts and an insurance policy, prosecutors specified that they could seize his assets under civil procedures “without regard to the status of his criminal conviction.”
Harry Litman, a University of California, San Diego, law professor and former deputy assistant attorney general, said that he had seen similar provisions in other cases. But other legal experts said it seemed tailor-made to ensure Mr. Manafort would lose much of his wealth, no matter what Mr. Trump did.
Sharon LaFraniere and Michael S. Schmidt reported from Washington, and Maggie Haberman from New York.
Last edited:
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
Why is Butina trying to get out of PC and walk the main line? 
GnauzBookOfRhymes
Superstar
Imagine all the crazy shyt Nunes and Co. managed to stifle that will be unearthed in January.
The “blocked call” that Donnie boy refused to acknowledge.
The “blocked call” that Donnie boy refused to acknowledge.
8:50 PM. NYTIMES. I see you.knowing NYTimes we could get an 8PM snack
The Fukin Prophecy
RIP Champ
Pretty clear Manafort is hoping for a pardon and I'd bet on him getting it...
Season 3 gon be fukkery overload...
Season 3 gon be fukkery overload...
Loretta Lynch didn't help...
Wait til NYAG opens those books
