Hood Critic
The Power Circle
yep...but we seen this coming about a month ago.drama?
yep...but we seen this coming about a month ago.drama?
yep...but we seen this coming about a month ago.
egos, agendas, cries for attention. Yet such a diverse group still tends to find themselves intersecting with what they report, speculate, hear or are being fed. Surprisingly a lot of it tended to be true.there certainly is an interesting patchwork of people working on this with a lot of egos at play
egos, agendas, cries for attention. Yet such a diverse group still tends to find themselves intersecting with what they report, speculate, hear or are being fed. Surprisingly a lot of it tended to be true.
It truly is but playing devils advocate - a lot of it could really be coordinated disinformation on an unprecedented level we've never seen before.We're really watching history and one of the biggest investigations play out in real time on the internet/twitter. It's amazing when you think about it.
"Chief of stuff" sounds like kushners titleDon't get bold extra sized letters with me you fukking weirdo.
This is your boy
Claude Taylor Photography - 2015
View attachment 16748
"Chief of Stuff" for less than a year and has more sources than any other journalist out there. :mjpatrice:
If he's right about everything he's posting then great. But I'm not about to trust someone like this without corroborating evidence just to not be "late" according to you.
It truly is but playing devils advocate - a lot of it could really be coordinated disinformation on an unprecedented level we've never seen before.
Jester was recently looking funny in the light based on some of his NK "sources"...I also noticed he took a brief twitter hiatus as well.
Triple check and take everyone's information with a grain of salt at this point.
The fact Naveed Jamali is treated like an expert hurts my head a little bitegos, agendas, cries for attention. Yet such a diverse group still tends to find themselves intersecting with what they report, speculate, hear or are being fed. Surprisingly a lot of it tended to be true.
The fact Naveed Jamali is treated like an expert hurts my head a little bit
he was literally a willing bag boy for the FBI. Nothing more.
Read his book.Expound on this. How do you know this? Do you work for the FBI? You have first hand knowledge of his role for the FBI?
People are stupid. That's what it boils down to. It's easy to manipulate stupid people too. The people I know who vote for them don't see anything wrong with them spending $15 million investigating what happened on 9/11 while the same group of people spent $60 million investigating whether Clinton was telling the truth about getting his dikk sucked by an intern. Generally I've noticed that once people fall in line with a party or a figurehead that doesn't believe in a democratic process or equality or justice or anything along those lines, it's essentially impossible to show them why they've been backing the wrong horse. They either can't or refuse to see it at that point.I don't understand why people vote Republican. They just passed a bill that will allow employers to give you time off instead of paying you for overtime hrs worked. They voted on bill to open up your internet browser history and want to eliminate the EPA. I could go on but you get the point. They introduce legislation that directly effects their base, negatively but helps corporations. I really don't get it.
Because Brown people, that's whyI don't understand why people vote Republican. They just passed a bill that will allow employers to give you time off instead of paying you for overtime hrs worked. They voted on bill to open up your internet browser history and want to eliminate the EPA. I could go on but you get the point. They introduce legislation that directly effects their base, negatively but helps corporations. I really don't get it.
People are stupid. That's what it boils down to. It's easy to manipulate stupid people too. The people I know who vote for them don't see anything wrong with them spending $15 million investigating what happened on 9/11 while the same group of people spent $60 million investigating whether Clinton was telling the truth about getting his dikk sucked by an intern. Generally I've noticed that once people fall in line with a party or a figurehead that doesn't believe in a democratic process or equality or justice or anything along those lines, it's essentially impossible to show them why they've been backing the wrong horse. They either can't or refuse to see it at that point.