RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

MIKE SPLEAN

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
8,400
Reputation
550
Daps
21,663
Yo, Trump starting a trade war with China that ends up hurting or even killing a bunch of rural racist inbreds is way better than Trump starting a nuclear war with China that kills people in the cities, especially since most black folks live in cities. Or starting a war that ships black folks out to die in some Middle Eastern or Asian rural area, since for some reason, black folks serve at levels above their population percentage.

I'm willing to let this idiot hurt my retirement fund for a bit if it starves out Trump supporters in rural areas. In fact, I would definitely pay substantial money to see Trump supporters starve, choke, and die, even if it's from my retirement accounts.
:dead:
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,485
Reputation
5,739
Daps
112,509
thats yo ass pauly.
:banderas:



wat6rr.jpg


At this stage, if Manafort buried a time capsule when he was six, Mueller wants to see it.

Dude is done in the past, present and future

:mjlol:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,699
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,961
Reppin
The Deep State


The Guardian view on the Skripal case: a long battle for values
EditorialThu 5 Apr 2018 18.24 BST
Russia is engaging in an aggressive disinformation war over the Skripal poisoning. It would be disastrous to respond in kind

5115.jpg

Russian officials, including the Russian ambassador Alexander Shulgin (left), give a press conference on the diplomatic crisis over the Skripal poisoning in Amsterdam, 4 April 2018. Photograph: Bart Maat/EPA
Anyone who thought the Sergei Skripal poisoning might be a relatively short-lived international incident, after which something like pre-existing normality would reassert itself, knows differently now. It is a month since Mr Skripal and his daughter Yulia were poisoned in Salisbury by a novichok nerve agent of a type developed by Russia. A week later Theresa May told parliament that it was highly likely that the Russian state was directly or indirectly responsible. The British view was then backed by the main political parties and most of Britain’s major allies. Diplomats were expelled on both sides. But the scandal refuses to die down and the questions surrounding the Skripal case continue to proliferate.

Much but not all of this is because Russia’s response has been so determinedly aggressive, energetic and defiant. Far from hiding away until the embarrassing dust settles, Russia has decided to fight an attacking propaganda and disinformation war on all fronts. President Vladimir Putin and his foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, have gone out of their way to parade a variety of grievances about the British charges, shamelessly turning Tuesday’s official UK scientific confirmation of the use of novichok into an apparent admission that the agent could not be sourced to – and thus might not be from – Russia. After the international Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons voted in the Hague by 15 to six against a Russian move for its scientists to be involved in a “joint” investigation. Russia pronounced that its move had succeeded because 17 countries had abstained. And on Thursday it was Russia, not Britain, that was due to take the matter to the United Nations security council.

Earlier on Thursday the Russian ambassador had given a marathon press conference full of the now familiar Russian disdain and innuendo against the British government. Even while the ambassador was speaking, his account littered with facetious red herrings, other events moved forward too. Russian TV broadcast a recording of an alleged phone call between Ms Skripal and her cousin Viktoria (presumably this was provided by the Russian intelligence service). Simultaneously, the Metropolitan police published the first public statement from Ms Skripal since she regained consciousness following the attack.

This will not be the end of the matter. Russia clearly wants to get access to Ms Skripal and to get her back home. It is already using her cousin’s wish to visit to force the issue further. Meanwhile, next week, the OPCW will issue its own report on the nerve agent samples that Britain has provided in line with agreed procedures. This week’s bogus Russian claims in the Hague seem certain to be repeated.

Russia is engaged in a long game of sustained diplomatic and political disruption. Its policy towards the liberal democracies is to undermine and divide. It is, as we have said before, a troll state. The united response to the Skripal poisoning has set its strategy back. Yet breaking alliances remains the name of the Russian game. It must be matched with a western long game, based on evidence (which a post-Iraq public will expect to see), law and patient alliance-building. This is one reason why Boris Johnson, with his indiscipline and his addiction to colourful language, is so often unhelpful for the British case. It may be tempting for the UK to hit back with the same kind of intemperate contempt that Russia is displaying. But that temptation must be resisted at all costs. This is not just a conflict of state against state, but one of liberal values against their negation.
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,485
Reputation
5,739
Daps
112,509
More radical transparency eh? :francis:

Facebook using secret tool to delete messages from executives
Facebook has been using a secret tool to delete messages sent by its executives from the inboxes of their recipients, without disclosing the deletions to the recipients – or even recording that there was ever a message there in the first place.

If you send Mark Zuckerberg a Facebook message, in other words, he has a copy for ever. But if he sends you one, he can reach into your inbox and pluck it out of existence.

The tool was discovered by TechCrunch, which noticed a discrepancy between emailed receipts of Facebook messages being received (which Facebook cannot retract) and the actual contents of Facebook inboxes. Tellingly, the replies to the messages sent by Zuckerberg remained in the chat logs, preserving a one-sided history of a two-sided conversation.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2017
Messages
33,425
Reputation
7,867
Daps
181,451


Let me post this again. This is our president. Watch it again on mute. Without volume one would think he received his test back, saw the big F and said "F stands for Fake News" then tosses the test:laff::laff::laff:


This would be an Emmy winning tv show, but it’s not a tv show. It’s real. The president of the United States threw prepared remarks away, as if each and everything the president says isn’t important.

Can you imagine if Obama did that? He’d be called classless, negros don’t know how to behave, blacks have no respect for the office of president etc.
 
Top