RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
23,948
Reputation
3,687
Daps
109,118
Reppin
דעת
how you gonna edit a memo you ain't read? :dahell:
If you can make it say what you need it to say, the rest of it is just filler.
cc062cb675cf006dc747049ebd57a938.png
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,006
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,444
Reppin
The Deep State
What is the point of Wray quitting if the memo is released? I don't understand how that does anything. Can someone enlighten me?
Sometimes the most honorable thing you can do is to quit, thus signaling the ultimate sacrifice of your faith in the institution that you can't commit to serving in the institution.

This is government breh

Remember the lawyers that threatened to quit last summer when Trump tried to fired Mueller? Thats basically the same thing. Thats "hey, I serve you in this job, but If you do this, I'll quit and you'll have to find someone else to replace me and it makes you look even worse"
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
308,006
Reputation
-34,332
Daps
618,444
Reppin
The Deep State
q6DpZas.gif

NIUImVb.gif





Trump Clears the Way for Release of Secret Republican Memo

Trump Clears the Way for Release of Secret Republican Memo
By NICHOLAS FANDOS and ADAM GOLDMANFEB. 1, 2018

02dc-memo-trump-superJumbo.jpg

President Trump had five days from the time of the vote to review the document for national security concerns and try to block it. Gabriella Demczuk for The New York Times
WASHINGTON — President Trump cleared the way on Thursday for the release of a secret memo written by Republican congressional staffers and said to accuse federal law enforcement officials of abusing their surveillance authorities.

Mr. Trump, who had a brief window to block the memo’s disclosure on national security grounds, was expected to tell Congress on Friday that he had no objections and would likely not request any material be redacted, according to a senior administration official. It would then be up to the House Intelligence Committee, whose Republican leaders have pushed for its release, to make the document public.


The president’s decision came despite a growing chorus of warnings from national security officials who say that releasing the document would jeopardize sensitive government information, including how intelligence is gathered, and from Democrats who say it is politically motivated and distorts the actions of the Justice Department and the F.B.I. by omitting crucial context.

But Mr. Trump wanted the memo out. He had told people close to him that he believes it makes the case that law enforcement officials acted inappropriately in seeking the highly classified warrant on one of his campaign advisers, Carter Page.

Speaker Paul D. Ryan on Thursday defended the memo and its primary author, Representative Devin Nunes, Republican of California, saying the document was not an attack on institutions like the F.B.I. and Justice Department, and was not meant to undermine the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III.

At least one Republican, Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 3 in the Senate, urged his House colleagues on Thursday to slow their push to release the memo.

Mr. Thune said he thought that the Senate Intelligence Committee and its Republican chairman, Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina, should be allowed to see the document before its release. He also said that House Republicans should carefully consider the F.B.I.’s warning that it had “grave concerns” about making the memo public.

“They need to pay careful attention to what our folks who protect us have to say about what this, you know, how this bears on our national security,” Mr. Thune told reporters at the Republicans’ annual policy retreat at the Greenbrier resort in West Virginia.

Mr. Thune also called for a Democratic memo rebutting the Republican document to be shown to the public at the same time.

In a rare statement on Wednesday, the F.B.I. strongly condemned the memo’s release, saying the bureau had “grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”

People familiar with the three-and-a-half page Republican memo say it contends that officials from the F.B.I. and Justice Department may have misled a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge when they sought a warrant to spy on Mr. Page in October 2016. The people say the officials relied on information handed over by a former British intelligence officer, Christopher Steele, without adequately explaining to the judge that Democrats had financed his research.


Also at issue on Thursday were charges by Democrats that the Republicans had made “material changes” to the memo after the Intelligence Committee voted to release it but before it was transmitted to the White House for review. Representative Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, wrote in a letter late Wednesday that the committee needed to restart the process and vote again on the revised memo under the same never-before-used House rules that the committee invoked to vote on the release. The committee had initially voted along party lines on Monday in favor of release.

The letter started yet another round of finger-pointing among committee members, who have bitterly wrestled over the memo. Republicans quickly countered Wednesday night that Mr. Schiff was “complaining about minor edits” and said their vote was “absolutely procedurally sound.” Another person familiar with the changes described them as more than cosmetic and an attempt to water down assertions made in the document.

In a sharply worded letter of her own Thursday morning, Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the Democratic leader, called on Mr. Ryan to remove Mr. Nunes as the Intelligence Committee’s chairman.

“Congressman Nunes’ deliberately dishonest actions make him unfit to serve as Chairman, and he must be removed immediately from this position,” she wrote, adding, “The integrity of the House is at stake.”

Mr. Nunes gave no indication that he intended to change course.

Mr. Trump had five days from the time of the vote to review the document for national security concerns and try to block it. The president apparently made up his mind quickly, telling a Republican congressman after his State of the Union address Tuesday night that he would not stop the release.

The White House also allowed officials from the nation’s intelligence agencies to review the document, but the Senate Intelligence Committee’s earlier request to see the memo was declined by House Republicans.





ijdl6i0.gif



@DonKnock @dza @88m3 @wire28 @smitty22 @fact @Hood Critic @ExodusNirvana @Blessed Is the Man @dtownreppin214 @JKFrazier @tmonster @BigMoneyGrip @Soymuscle Mike @.r. @Dorian Breh @Dameon Farrow @TheNig @VR Tripper @re'up @Blackfyre_Berserker @Cali_livin
 

MR. Conclusion

All Star
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
2,585
Reputation
400
Daps
8,840
Reppin
Atlanta
Sometimes the most honorable thing you can do is to quit, thus signaling the ultimate sacrifice of your faith in the institution that you can't commit to serving in the institution.

This is government breh

Remember the lawyers that threatened to quit last summer when Trump tried to fired Mueller? Thats basically the same thing. Thats "hey, I serve you in this job, but If you do this, I'll quit and you'll have to find someone else to replace me and it makes you look even worse"

Doesn't it make sense to stay and fight the good fight? Quitting leaves an opening for a trump apologist to take over. I don't think he cares about looking bad at this point.
 

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,567
Reputation
12,760
Daps
92,595
Doesn't it make sense to stay and fight the good fight? Quitting leaves an opening for a trump apologist to take over. I don't think he cares about looking bad at this point.

i read somewhere that if the memo is released Wray is gonna issue a public rebuttal
that would be unprecedented [or even unpresidented]

at least wray is trying to keep the support of the agency
i am scared to death who cheeto would appoint if Wray left
 

AZBeauty

Stop lyin' nicca.
Joined
Oct 23, 2012
Messages
5,921
Reputation
2,305
Daps
35,601
Reppin
Chicago, Il
q6DpZas.gif

NIUImVb.gif
People familiar with the three-and-a-half page Republican memo say it contends that officials from the F.B.I. and Justice Department may have misled a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge when they sought a warrant to spy on Mr. Page in October 2016. The people say the officials relied on information handed over by a former British intelligence officer, Christopher Steele, without adequately explaining to the judge that Democrats had financed his research.

:dwillhuh:
It was initially funded by the GOP. These mofos are retarded. The media is going to tear this memo apart.
 

MR. Conclusion

All Star
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
2,585
Reputation
400
Daps
8,840
Reppin
Atlanta
i read somewhere that if the memo is released Wray is gonna issue a public rebuttal
that would be unprecedented [or even unpresidented]

at least wray is trying to keep the support of the agency
i am scared to death who cheeto would appoint if Wray left

That's how I feel. I rather he stays than god knows who replaces him.
 

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,567
Reputation
12,760
Daps
92,595
Rising White House fear: Nunes memo is a dud

:mjgrin:
because it is,
nunes is a shyt flunky
and Page was already under Fisa survellience and even he admits that

but go ahead!
blow up the FBI etc and gain nothing other than the simple ass trumptards who already believe your bullshyt
but now you have permanent enemies in the IC

great plan
 
Top