Yes. It isPics with a guy carrying the nuke console isn't a breech.
I'm not claiming to be an expert, however, it does seem like I know more about this shyt than you dudes that think you know what the fukk is up cuz you watch a few Hollywood movies.Oh, now you're the National Security Expert
This is a breach of security protocol at the highest levels. Period.
yeah, and thats TRUMP'S problem.Funny how ppl are so concerned with security and security breeches but don't seem to care about all these "leaks" that seem to be coming from these same ppl....
Oh, now you're the National Security Expert
This is a breach of security protocol at the highest levels. Period.
Anything you "beta-cucks" don't like is therefore "outrage culture"I'm not claiming to be an expert, however, it does seem like I know more about this shyt than you dudes that think you know what the fukk is up cuz you watch a few Hollywood movies.
that's exactly what I'm talking about.Google does have more pics of the carrier, and the football than I would have thought. Diagrams and all that.
An irrelevant question considering the location of the one man who would need access to it.so tell us....how many footballs are there? do you think they just have one being carried around by a guy out in the open??
or....????
So now we're just devolving into trading ICBMsYou aren't familiar with anything to be honest. There is a team of holders not just one man. This isn't new. There is a polaroid picture of the guy I mentioned earlier with the football in teh science building in ASU or it used to be there when I went.
You literally are trying to manufacture an outrage.
Also who are these people you are afraid of , if soviets shot nukes US radar would know and you can bet the US would have already shot its counter nuke back without presidential command. A lot of this shyt is already handled. They tell most of the people the president is needed because it stops you from asking other questions.
The media taking a pics of dudes standing solemnly is different from that same guy taking pics with rich a$$holes at the president's private club he's using to bypass corruption clauses.that's exactly what I'm talking about.
funny how there is so much interest and outrage when something happens that surrounds trump than what has historically been SOP.
these new age fukks that come around and just want to be outraged because its cool to do it are lame as fukk.
lol, and those are impossible to believe in what way?In the span of a week he's gone from a man whose wife is a nurse and makes considerably more money than he does to now an expert on National Security sweeping rooms for the government elite.
Bruh, you can't even deploy a successful thread on here, much less a nuclear weapon.I'm not claiming to be an expert, however, it does seem like I know more about this shyt than you dudes that think you know what the fukk is up cuz you watch a few Hollywood movies.
lol, and those are impossible to believe in what way?
I spent 15 years working comms with the government/military, plus a wife that is in fact a nurse. but I guess it seems to good to be true so just call me a liar huh??
Neither of which contradict themselves....you lames are trying too hard.
Yes. It is
He shouldn't be allowed to or even have the possibility to cavort with the man with the fukking football.
Period.
theres no way you can excuse this. At all.
I don't give a fukk if Obama, Clinton, or Carter did it.
Its inexcusable.
Don't talk all this "bipartisan" bullshyt then refuse to call Trump out at any turn.
You all were mad at Hillary for being careless with her emails, so don't give me shyt about Trump being ON SMARTPHONE CAMERAS doing the same fukking thing.
there is no debate here.Anything you "beta-cucks" don't like is therefore "outrage culture"
You can't keep flinging that card when you're losing the debate.