RUSSIA 🇷🇺 / РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGENT

[Hood Critic]

This whole outrage at a picture being taken, which is common is a manufactured outrage.
Who mentioned soviets?

The picture you reference doesn't show enough to match your assertion that there wasn't a secure perimeter. It literally offers you no support at all.
There is no other jibba jabba, you literally don't know what you are talking about and are rambling trying to save face now.

You aren't familiar with anything to be honest. There is a team of holders not just one man. This isn't new. There is a polaroid picture of the guy I mentioned earlier with the football in teh science building in ASU or it used to be there when I went.

You literally are trying to manufacture an outrage.
Also who are these people you are afraid of , if soviets shot nukes US radar would know and you can bet the US would have already shot its counter nuke back without presidential command. A lot of this shyt is already handled. They tell most of the people the president is needed because it stops you from asking other questions.

 

[Maschine_Man]

So let me ask you a simple question....since it's no big deal that the photo was taken of the aide-de-camp, would you consider it a big deal if the contingency football and/or it's carrier were also photo'd and identified?

Serious question.

Do you know what an aide-de-camp actually is??

it's a personal assistant. That's it.

and if in fact the aide-de-camp carries the football(like you guys think) then why is it so easy to find out who the aide-de-camp actually is?

 

[Maschine_Man]

Sounds delicious.....

 

[NY's #1 Draft Pick]

You have no idea what you are talking about. the comms guys aren't isolated and there is no reason they can't take pictures now when they have been doing it before. Unless you know about a rules change no one else does.
It isn't a problem.

Hillary violated her security clearance and laws pertaining to the handling of classified material. You haven't brought up a single law or command violated by Trump with this picture or the sec meeting.

YOu literally are grasping at straws and trying to make an issue when there isn't one.

Doesn't trump tweet from an unsecured cellphone

#trumpset is really working overtime for all this guys fukkups

 

[David_TheMan]

Actually he called her handling irresponsible and careless, but that he could not recommend charges because there was no proof of intent to determine criminality. If we're being hyper hyper hyper technical. Either way, without being charged or convicted you are over reaching with the claim that what she did was criminal.

Not a reach at all, she literally broke the law with regard to handling top secret information and everyone admitted to it.
They simply choose not to charge her.
So your initial contention was false, regarding my comparison of the two events trump taking pictures and hillary actually breaking the law.

 

[Arithmetic]

What the hell happened at Mar A Lago. I feel like I've missed so much.

 

[David_TheMan]

Doesn't trump tweet from an unsecured cellphone

#trumpset is really working overtime for all this guys fukkups

You wouldn't use twitter from siprnet, so I don't understand what point you are trying to make?It would be a problem if he did do that.

 

[Pressure]

Not a reach at all, she literally broke the law with regard to handling top secret information and everyone admitted to it.
They simply choose not to charge her.
So your initial contention was false, regarding my comparison of the two events trump taking pictures and hillary actually breaking the law.

Innocent until proven guilty only applies unless you're talking about Hillary. Got it. Cool.

 

[David_TheMan]

sorry my bad.


wipe out the reference to soviets and its what I'm trying to get across.

 

[Hood Critic]

Do you know what an aide-de-camp actually is??

it's a personal assistant. That's it.

and if in fact the aide-de-camp carries the football(like you guys think) then why is it so easy to find out who the aide-de-camp actually is?

You answered the question with another question...

 

[David_TheMan]

Innocent until proven guilty only applies unless you're talking about Hillary. Got it. Cool.

There isn't a question of her violating the law, unless now you are claiming she didn't actually post classified info on an unsecured server.
Are you claiming that now?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

There isn't a question of her violating the law, unless now you are claiming she didn't actually post classified info on an unsecured server.
Are you claiming that now?

Stop fukking trolling.

This is about The president.

 

[David_TheMan]

Stop fukking trolling.

This is about The president.

You seem to have problem following a logical conversation. I would suggest you get out of a convo string you are too lazy to read and go about your business.

 

[Pressure]

There isn't a question of her violating the law, unless now you are claiming she didn't actually post classified info on an unsecured server.
Are you claiming that now?

There is a question of her violating the law. That's why she wasn't charged. The very question was, "does the presence of classified e-mail on the private e-mail server constitute a violation of the law?"

 

[David_TheMan]

There is a question of her violating the law. That's why she wasn't charged. The very question was, "does the presence of classified e-mail on the private e-mail server constitute a violation of the law?"

It was a violation of the law, there was no question of her violations, the only question was if the AG would charge.
They opted not to charge, the FBI opted, initially, not to charge.
Simple as that.

When you get a clearance and handle info, for us regular joes intent is never a option in mishandling info, either you mishandled it or you didn't, she didn't. When you are higher up though as always, laws don't apply to you.