When did you leave? What was your official title? What branch? Where were you stationed? Tell of more.
RUSSIA 🇷🇺 / РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGENT
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
David_TheMan
Banned
Except the aide-de-camp is specifically to always be around next to the President when they are "in the field" and away from military compounds.So now we're just devolving into trading ICBMs
How about the aide-de-camp not having access to the POTUS. Period.
So what you are claiming isn't even the reality of the situation.
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
Manufacturing outrage....where? Now i'm afraid of the Soviets and whatever other boogie man you want to bring up.
I simply responded to your original assertion that the Secret Service had a secure perimeter setup which clearly isn't the case based on photographic evidence.
You went into all this other jibba jabba, not me.
it's irrelevant?
the one guy you see that is allegedly carrying the football is relevant . But other footballs being in existence being carried by ppl you don't see is not?
David_TheMan
Banned
This whole outrage at a picture being taken, which is common is a manufactured outrage.
Who mentioned soviets?
The picture you reference doesn't show enough to match your assertion that there wasn't a secure perimeter. It literally offers you no support at all.
There is no other jibba jabba, you literally don't know what you are talking about and are rambling trying to save face now.
Since we're being Technical here. Hillary didn't violate any laws either. At least according to a republican led FBI.
Do you think it's bad practice to parade him around for Instagram Photo Ops for the rich guest of Trumps Mar-A-Largo club?it's irrelevant?
the one guy you see that is allegedly carrying the football is relevant . But other footballs being in existence being carried by ppl you don't see is not?
David_TheMan
Banned
Hillary did in fact violate laws, the AG just said they were not going to press charges and the FBI director initially claimed her violations of the law weren't due to "gross negligence" so he wouldn't recommend charges.Since we're being Technical here. Hillary didn't violate any laws either. At least according to a republican led FBI.
If we are being hyper technical.
No, I don't think it is a good idea, not unless he is in fact a decoy. Or not even the guy that actually has the football.Do you think it's bad practice to parade him around for Instagram Photo Ops for the rich guest of Trumps Mar-A-Largo club?
It wouldn't surprise me if he was just the guy carryng around paperwork, laundry, or even a bag full of spare toupees. Hyping himself up for the guests..
Actually he called her handling irresponsible and careless, but that he could not recommend charges because there was no proof of intent to determine criminality. If we're being hyper hyper hyper technical. Either way, without being charged or convicted you are over reaching with the claim that what she did was criminal.
feigning outrage?
What the fukk does that mean???????????????????
Everything you don't approve of, isn't "fake outrage"
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
So let me ask you a simple question....since it's no big deal that the photo was taken of the aide-de-camp, would you consider it a big deal if the contingency football and/or it's carrier were also photo'd and identified?it's irrelevant?
the one guy you see that is allegedly carrying the football is relevant . But other footballs being in existence being carried by ppl you don't see is not?
Serious question.