The fact this is even happening is INSANE
Steele is talking to Muller about the pee pee tapes. That fukking moron Trump is about to lose it.
Robert Mueller's Russia Probe Reportedly Looking Into The 'Pee Tape' Dossier | HuffPost
HOW IS FACEBOOK TO BIG TO FAIL ?FB needs to be dealt with but I think it has become a sort of too-big-to-fail giant and will escape this fairly unscathed. There's too much money invested and the gen public, as they obviously have demonstrated by believing in whatever BS they see on FB, are neither smart nor engaged enough to give a shyt. With its sheer size, Trump being in WH and Peter Thiel and Yuri Milner still going strong, I just don't see an equal counter force that will correct this problem.
HOW IS FACEBOOK TO BIG TO FAIL ?
White House tech support discovered the suspected breach after Kelly turned his phone in to tech support staff this summer.
Dude. What the fukk is he talking about? Is he leaking again?
@DonKnock @SJUGrad13 @88m3 @Menelik II @wire28 @smitty22 @Reality @fact @Hood Critic @ExodusNirvana @Blessed Is the Man @THE MACHINE @OneManGang @dtownreppin214 @JKFrazier @tmonster @blotter @BigMoneyGrip @Soymuscle Mike @Grano-Grano @.r.
You know this is exactly how it went down.Tillerson just looks like someone with "moron" firmly in his lexicon, old cow poke come CEO and intl power player that he is.
I haven't really delved too deeply into the FB thing, so maybe someone can clarify this for me. Are they being targeted because of what other people use their software/service/platform for? If so, how is that any different than a company like Mozilla coming under fire for other people for using their software/service/platform to watch child porn, or something of that ilk.HOW IS FACEBOOK TO BIG TO FAIL ?
He was warned about this happening as was Twitter & they did nothingI haven't really delved too deeply into the FB thing, so maybe someone can clarify this for me. Are they being targeted because of what other people use their software/service/platform for? If so, how is that any different than a company like Mozilla coming under fire for other people for using their software/service/platform to watch child porn, or something of that ilk.
OR are they being targeted because they took approx $100,000 from someone looking to buy ad space, and didn't thoroughly vet the source? If so, how does that fall on Zuckeberg? Again, I'm not defending anything, just looking for some clarification. Serious replies only please.