1 of 4
Yeah but you can't say they refuse to propel young stars when 1 is right there face gleaming on the poster. (Also when Rollins and Bryan closed out your last 2 Mania's)
You just proved his point.
1 of 4
You just proved his point.
For what? Both guys past their prime. Streak's over, no one cares.
In 2016?
With no title or streak?
Maybe not to smarks but if you think the casual fans, the ones who's list of wrestlers they know trickle down to Cena and Taker, wouldn't care for that match you're on one. Title/streak or not
I mean its the best they can do given the circumstances but its not a marquee dream matchup or anything. The stakes aren't as high as they should be. If Taker loses and its his farewell match, no one needs or has use for the rub of retiring him LESS than Cena, but at the same time they haven't built upcoming guys up enough so they're limited in other options. They've painted themselves into a corner w their stupid decisions, as usual.Maybe not to smarks but if you think the casual fans, the ones who's list of wrestlers they know trickle down to Cena and Taker, wouldn't care for that match you're on one. Title/streak or not
No one has any interest in Cena/Taker as a random dream match in 2016. You have a month or so to create the feud. The reason I thought the streak breaking sucked, was because the lack of a decent feud preceding. This is hot garbage.
But if Cena loses to a 50+ yr old and shakes his hand at the end
You can when it's been the same people opening raw for 20 minutes the last 15 years, and the champion of your company is 46 years old and hasn't wrestled in over a year and only comes in when it's convenient for him(see Punk 2011)Yeah but you can't say they refuse to propel young stars when 1 is right there face gleaming on the poster. (Also when Rollins and Bryan closed out your last 2 Mania's)
Cena vs Taker draws a million buyrates and tickets no questions asked
Casual fans? Sounds more like you're talking about kidsMaybe not to smarks but if you think the casual fans, the ones who's list of wrestlers they know trickle down to Cena and Taker, wouldn't care for that match you're on one. Title/streak or not. Just look at WWEs YouTube videos, anything Cena Taker Rock or Brock is guaranteed 5 Milli views
I know, because it can't be argued. It's good to stand down on this one. What, is Cena gonna just show up at WM and pull a Bray? What would the feud even be about. Nah, people just want to see old ass Taker wrestle every year, huh?I'm not gonna argue as to whether or not Cena vs Taker would attract viewers, its pretty much a foregone conclusion that people want to see that match, I'm not sure why this board doesn't like it.
Cena vs Taker draws a million buyrates and tickets no questions asked
Yeah, it's real good they've been able to keep them apart for so long, but the Cena Taker ship has sailed. Should've have done it when both where hot on Smackdown. They've had so many opportunities to do this...and they want to do some fly by booking now? Doubt it, and it won't even get 100K extra buys, because the shyt looks thrown together.Maybe 5 or 6 years ago, I do wonder if the casual fan who gives you millions of buyrates and tickets goes "Yeah but they wrestled before right? They must have? They still haven't? Isnt it a bit too late?" if you ask them now though.
I'm not gonna argue as to whether or not Cena vs Taker would attract viewers, its pretty much a foregone conclusion that people want to see that match, I'm not sure why this board doesn't like it.