Rotten Tomato scores that leave you baffled

MartyMcFly

What's up doc, can we rock?
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
59,888
Reputation
9,181
Daps
161,024
Reppin
P.G. County
another reason i miss ebert.

he used to re-review old films decades letter for a fresh perspective and to see how they aged.. his ratings would often change in the newer review

And he also rated movies based on what they were, not what he wanted or expected them to be and judged them based on that.
 

MartyMcFly

What's up doc, can we rock?
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
59,888
Reputation
9,181
Daps
161,024
Reppin
P.G. County
As most of the thread states black movies get shytted on the worst by "critics" :pacspit:

Can I be real for a second breh? And I know it's going to get some hate thrown my way and I'm cool with that but a lot of our movies are shoddily made and a lot of black actors and actresses have admitted that. The attention to detail isn't always there, the script quality isn't always there and a lot of times the acting is meh. I think Boomerang got the rating it got because there was a backlash against Eddie at the time because he just wasn't on point anymore although I'd argue that Boomerang is one of his funniest flicks. But we cut corners when we do shyt sometimes man and that's gotta change.
 

Mortal1

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
13,076
Reputation
3,170
Daps
42,320
Reppin
The Bay Area
Can I be real for a second breh? And I know it's going to get some hate thrown my way and I'm cool with that but a lot of our movies are shoddily made and a lot of black actors and actresses have admitted that. The attention to detail isn't always there, the script quality isn't always there and a lot of times the acting is meh. I think Boomerang got the rating it got because there was a backlash against Eddie at the time because he just wasn't on point anymore although I'd argue that Boomerang is one of his funniest flicks. But we cut corners when we do shyt sometimes man and that's gotta change.

Oh no I feel and understand what your saying I'm mostly talking about the movies that are genuinely good like you mentioned Boomerang being shytted on.
 
Last edited:

Mortal1

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2014
Messages
13,076
Reputation
3,170
Daps
42,320
Reppin
The Bay Area
:salute:

I just think that was during a period when everyone was down on Eddie. I fukk with Vampire in Brooklyn but a lot of people don't

There's a lot of funny stuff in that movie like when he disguises himself as a Italian :dead: but ultimately I think the movie was a little too high concept for a Eddie Murphy movie at that time.
 

NobodyReally

Superstar
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
8,366
Reputation
3,109
Daps
27,925
Reppin
Cornfields, cows, & an one stoplight town
  • 66%
    Lucy
    (2014) - should have been 30% or below

  • 99%
    Boyhood (2014)- bullshyt. This movie was a 50% at best


  • 69%
    Stoker (2013)- should have been a 85% or above. I think the subject matter spooked the critics


  • 93%
    Drive (2011)- should be a 80% or below

 

Dominic Brehetto

Rest In Piss To Your Cousin
Supporter
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
31,723
Reputation
4,290
Daps
88,458
Reppin
Family
Im not sure all the people saying movies should be this % instead of that % really understand what rt is.


Its not saying a movie is 86%, its just saying 86% of critics gave it a score of 6/10 out or higher.

I mean, it just seems funny saying "90% of critics should have had a different opinion" :birdman:


Which is actually one of my biggezt problems with how people use RT. They just look at the % and ignore the actual average rating. A movie can be at 100% and only have a middling average of like 6.5/10. So people only look at that 100% and think the movie is about to be amazing when really its just a passabke flick to critics.
 

Won Won

Superstar
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
14,467
Reputation
3,384
Daps
46,622
Im not sure all the people saying movies should be this % instead of that % really understand what rt is.


Its not saying a movie is 86%, its just saying 86% of critics gave it a score of 6/10 out or higher.

I mean, it just seems funny saying "90% of critics should have had a different opinion" :birdman:


Which is actually one of my biggezt problems with how people use RT. They just look at the % and ignore the actual average rating. A movie can be at 100% and only have a middling average of like 6.5/10. So people only look at that 100% and think the movie is about to be amazing when really its just a passabke flick to critics.


It blows my mind that it's 2014 and some people still don't understand how RT works
 

kp404

Live Or Let Die
Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
19,086
Reputation
7,361
Daps
46,052
Reppin
The Black Community
:salute:

I just think that was during a period when everyone was down on Eddie. I fukk with Vampire in Brooklyn but a lot of people don't

I thought Eddie did a great job in Vampire in Brooklyn for what he was given...the last 3rd o the movie was horribly scripted and directed, so that's where it loses me...it's not Eddie's fault; its Craven's fault
 

kp404

Live Or Let Die
Supporter
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
19,086
Reputation
7,361
Daps
46,052
Reppin
The Black Community
he also really loved black movies.. even the hood ones

and his wife was black

ebert was black at heart :obama:

I wouldn't say all that but I read his reviews faithfully as his tastes were similar to mine...when he passed it was a bad day for me..he really helped me out alot in understanding film and loving it
 
Top