Rolling Stone Magazine says NOT SO FAST to everyone thinking Jonathan Majors was about to get off that easy

[Ziggiy]

No, this article says HIS LAWYER is ALLEGING that there's probable cause based on the "evidence" she claims she submitted. That means nothing. Frankly, this was just more spin from his lawyer, and it seems to have worked with the masses.

“Yahoo Entertainment can confirm the NYPD found probable cause to arrest Jabbari after Majors met with the NYPD last week.”

The report says MAJORS met with The NYPD and submitted the evidence. NOT his lawyer. NOT his representatives. MAJORS himself. I’m sure his Lawyer was present but MAJORS himself is the one who met and spoke to the NYPD


“Late last week, the police issued what is known as an I-card for Ms. Jabbari. The I-card, which appears in a department database, is different from an arrest warrant, which is typically signed by a judge, but alerts officers that there is probable cause to arrest Ms. Jabbari.”

The NY Times and Insider are reporting this citing “Three people with knowledge of the matter” AKA “Sources”.


Now if Rolling Stone can publish a hit piece longer than my dikk citing NOTHING MORE than anonymous “sources” supposedly going back a decade then it can be countered by the NY Times publishing a piece that CLEARLY states Majors met with Law Enforcement and, after providing his version of events with supplementary evidence, they determined there’s cause to arrest her. Because at the end of the day there IS video and pictures showing the lady out partying with nary an injury to be seen (AFTER the supposed incident). There IS leaked text messages from her to him stating he didn’t hurt her. Now whether you want to believe these things aren’t proof of innocence and simply strategy on his Lawyer’s part then thats your prerogative.

 

[CHICAGO]

No, this article says HIS LAWYER is ALLEGING that there's probable cause based on the "evidence" she claims she submitted. That means nothing. Frankly, this was just more spin from his lawyer, and it seems to have worked with the masses.

MAYBE YOU MISSED
THE INITIAL ARTICLES ON IT....

"Acting on an assault complaint filed last week by Majors and first reported by Insider, the NYPD has issued what is called a probable cause "I-card," or "Investigation card," for the London-based woman, Grace Jabbari, according to people with knowledge of the investigation and a copy of the document reviewed by Insider.

The electronic document authorizes police to arrest Jabbari on suspicion of third-degree assault if she returns to the US."


Edit: ALREADY POSTED ABOVE ME


​

 

[Meowth tote da Uzi]

fukk Rolling Stone they BEEN on bullshyt

 

[Sterling Archer]

I don't get it, a lot of the alleged abused happened before he was a huge name so why didn't the came forward back them?

Because its bullshyt. He isnt big enough nor supported enough for some bytch from high school he dated or college to be concerned about career repercussions or personal retribution.

 

[The_Sheff]

If I’m “tortured” I’m not waiting until the person gets in trouble for something else to bring it up.


Lol at toxic. You would get labeled toxic at Yale just from being a black male.

 

[943oh5]

“Yahoo Entertainment can confirm the NYPD found probable cause to arrest Jabbari after Majors met with the NYPD last week.”

The report says MAJORS met with The NYPD and submitted the evidence. NOT his lawyer. NOT his representatives. MAJORS himself. I’m sure his Lawyer was present but MAJORS himself is the one who met and spoke to the NYPD


“Late last week, the police issued what is known as an I-card for Ms. Jabbari. The I-card, which appears in a department database, is different from an arrest warrant, which is typically signed by a judge, but alerts officers that there is probable cause to arrest Ms. Jabbari.”

The NY Times and Insider are reporting this citing “Three people with knowledge of the matter” AKA “Sources”.


Now if Rolling Stone can publish a hit piece longer than my dikk citing NOTHING MORE than anonymous “sources” supposedly going back a decade then it can be countered by the NY Times publishing a piece that CLEARLY states Majors met with Law Enforcement and, after providing his version of events with supplementary evidence, they determined there’s cause to arrest her. Because at the end of the day there IS video and pictures showing the lady out partying with nary an injury to be seen (AFTER the supposed incident). There IS leaked text messages from her to him stating he didn’t hurt her. Now whether you want to believe these things aren’t proof of innocence and simply strategy on his Lawyer’s part then thats your prerogative.

an i-card is not an arrest warrant and has a much lower (read: nonexistent) threshold to issue. if there was probable cause she committed a crime his lawyer, in conjunction with the DA, would have gone before a JUDGE to have her arrested by the NYPD - or, more likely given the nature of the case, the charges against him would have been dropped. this is nothing but more posturing by his lawyer to sway the court of opinion.

 

[Roland Coltrane]

This won't change anything, the public is heavily on his side

not by the looks of things

 

[Supa cat]

Peep this


Are they lying on his name?

 

[Neuromancer]

Whether he is guilty or innocent this will tarnish his name.

 

[Gloxina]

Is that Devon

 

[8WON6]

How old is he? They got two dozen people that have intimate knowledge of how he is in relationships? If that many people knew, at Yale nonetheless, how was he even able to make it this far?

this is what nobody seems to want to answer. somehow when he was a no-name he was bullying all of Yale and bullying people on moviesets as a low level actor. Somehow low-level Jonathan Majors had people signing NDAs?

 

[8WON6]

edit: double post

 

[Tair]

this is what nobody seems to want to answer. somehow when he was a no-name he was bullying all of Yale and bullying people on moviesets as a low level actor. Somehow low-level Jonathan Majors had people signing NDAs?

A Black man from a poor background was moving like a white man who comes from very old money and is well connected.

It's absolutely ridiculous.

 

[Sterling Archer]

this is what nobody seems to want to answer. somehow when he was a no-name he was bullying all of Yale and bullying people on moviesets as a low level actor. Somehow low-level Jonathan Majors had people signing NDAs?

shyt makes no sense. Majors hasnt made a name for himself until the last 3-4yrs but a no name, no count actor getting no work the last 20yrs prior apparently was in the Illuminati and absconding bytches into Bolivian like a Dan Brown novel.

 

[CHICAGO]

this is what nobody seems to want to answer. somehow when he was a no-name he was bullying all of Yale and bullying people on moviesets as a low level actor. Somehow low-level Jonathan Majors had people signing NDAs?

shyt makes no sense. Majors hasnt made a name for himself until the last 3-4yrs but a no name, no count actor getting no work the last 20yrs prior apparently was in the Illuminati and absconding bytches into Bolivian like a Dan Brown novel.

AND IT WAS SKINNY, WEAK
MAJORS DOING ALL OF THIS.

THEYRE TELLING ALL
OF THESE STORIES UNDER
THE GUISE IT WAS A ROIDED UP
RAGING nikka.

​