I mean, seriously, anyone defending this cat clearly doesn't know a single person with a doctorate.
shyt, even if you follow politics a little, you understand that anyone with a doctorate is questioned about their dissertation. You can lose elections and government appointments over what you write in your dissertation.
Secondly, the obstacles he sets up to describe a real black man and a white man are quite ridiculous:
- Black men who fight to break the chains of systematic oppression are judged as individuals. Once they marry or procreate white, they lose the right to argue that they've fought systematic oppression. They've lost his respect.
- White men however, who fight to break the chains of systematic oppression ARE JUDGED by their ability and efforts to break the chains of systematic oppression. Notice, even though he never establishes the same critique of a white man who lays with a white woman, as he does with a black man who lays with a white woman. If black men lose respect for sleeping with white woman, the same rule should apply to white men. So why are you giving the white man an out and not explicitly stating they can never be partners in the struggle (notice I never said equals).
Which leads to my next point:
- White's are judged as systems, but what defines the system aren't white groups that funded the naacp, or white groups that funded the civil rights movement, or white groups that pushed for black rights bills since 1776. When it comes to whites, the system IS the whole. There is no benchmark for individual contribution. No group, no segment of the population that contributes positively for black rights is allowed to be distinguished from the whole.
nikka so who do you respect? You? fukk out of here. You still haven't shown us receipts for the money you pocketed.
Stop accepting these black colored men who lie to you and play with your sensibilities through the exhaustive use of the word black as an adjective or adverb.
