I've seen a lot more people wearing those Curry joints on the court than the new Lebrons.
"Right now, LeBron James is losing." How Nike Lost Steph to Under Armour
- Thread starter spoonfed
- Start date
I've seen a lot more people wearing those Curry joints on the court than the new Lebrons.
These lame nikkas just be talkin man. So opinionated and dont know shyt
Nobody gonna post them sales #'s to dead this argument
It really doesn't matter. Wall Street is responding well to Under Armour. With the sheer amount of research they do on a daily basis, if UA was lying about Steph propelling their sales, their stock would be in the garbage.
I don't care either way, was just a lot of back and forth and no #'s
let me educate you about Wall Street not giving a fukk about real numbers and the housing market crash
USSInsiders
Banned
nikka ain't nobody buying Steph Curry ugly ass shoes over Nike...
if you actually believe this propaganda
See this is why if you worked for Nike, I'd call you a retard.
This isn't about the present, this is about the future.
You and I see Nike for what it is because we grew up with a non-stop barrage of marketing from Nike and Jordan products.
Guess what?
Your kids and my kids may very well look at LeBron sneakers and Kobe sneakers as old, nobody-gives-a-fukk-anymore joints.
When I go to the gym I see young kids wearing Under Armour shirts and wearing Curry sneakers, not LeBrons or Kobes.
Under Armour has Curry, Jordan Spieth, and a whole host of new markets lined up that will own the future. I guarantee you Curry's basketball brand will undoubtedly be what Jordan was to Nike in the distant future. Maybe not as a lifestyle brand, but as a sports brand, I am more than confident Under Armour is going to be what Nike is considered now.
JP_614
Superstar
G-Zeus
G-Zeus Chrystler...the brehsident
Curry shoes too young to act like it's gonna last... He needs to make sure his career last long enough so another pg don't take his spot...one injury away from being a fad ...no jinx... Just saying
USSInsiders
Banned
Ehhh, it's not a bad stock to own, but the market as a whole isn't something I'm keen on investing in. It's about 82 a share right now but last Fall my Under Armour shares were anywhere beetween $95 - $100
Sub-prime financing, credit default swaps, and complex finance in general is a totally different ballgame from a normal publicly traded retail company. There's no high level, long term financing going on here. You can judge these companies off of normal performance metrics.
let me educate you about Wall Street not giving a fukk about real numbers and the housing market crash