Revenge is a Dish Best Served GOLD: The Official 2012 SF 49ers Season Thread

JLova

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,022
Reputation
4,632
Daps
182,315
A qb can't always just throw the ball away. U can't just throw the ball out of bounds when no reciever is in the vicinity. That will be a flag. Also when a pass rusher is up on a qb hella fast , sometimes its better to just protect the ball and take the sack. How many times have u seen an defensive end or blitzing db swipe at the ball when the qb is in the pocket ,forcing a fumble? U gotta know as a qb when u have to just take a sack. thats qb 101 bruh

You're missing the POINT!


It's not about "taking a sack". It's about the original poster saying that being sacked is a good strategy when it really isn't. Of course when there is no other option, you take the sack.

It's like being a fighter pilot and beign advised to hit the eject button at the first sight of danger when you have several OTHER options.

Of course if you're in a tailspin then you should eject. But to call that a strategy is silly.

You're missing what I'm saying. Of course you take the sack when that's your only option. But to tuck the ball as soon as there's a little bit of pressure is ridiculous and can not be called "strategy".

I think back to the play last year where the snap went over Alex's head. Instead of jumping on the ball and "taking the sack" for 10+ yards (as some of you would advocate is brilliant strategy) he picked up the ball, kept his eyes downfield and hit frank gore who was interfered with in the endzone...that play was flagged for defensive PI and the 9ers got the ball on the goal line.

You take the sack if there's no other option. That's a given. However, throwing it away is an even better option...and the best of all is making a play for positive yards.
 

Ronnie Lott

#49erGang
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
63,165
Reputation
10,380
Daps
225,538
You're missing the POINT!


It's not about "taking a sack". It's about the original poster saying that being sacked is a good strategy when it really isn't. Of course when there is no other option, you take the sack.

It's like being a fighter pilot and beign advised to hit the eject button at the first sight of danger when you have several OTHER options.

Of course if you're in a tailspin then you should eject. But to call that a strategy is silly.

You're missing what I'm saying. Of course you take the sack when that's your only option. But to tuck the ball as soon as there's a little bit of pressure is ridiculous and can not be called "strategy".


Aaaite. I get what ur sayin about its not a "strategy". I agree with u on that.. we on thesame page now mane!:cheers:

I think back to the play last year where the snap went over Alex's head. Instead of jumping on the ball and "taking the sack" for 10+ yards (as some of you would advocate is brilliant strategy) he picked up the ball, kept his eyes downfield and hit frank gore who was interfered with in the endzone...that play was flagged for defensive PI and the 9ers got the ball on the goal line.

You take the sack of there's no other option. That's a given. However, throwing it away is an even better option...and the best of all is making a play for positive yards.
 

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,427
Reputation
2,844
Daps
68,391
Reppin
The Yay
I think back to the play last year where the snap went over Alex's head. Instead of jumping on the ball and "taking the sack" for 10+ yards (as some of you would advocate is brilliant strategy) he picked up the ball, kept his eyes downfield and hit frank gore who was interfered with in the endzone...that play was flagged for defensive PI and the 9ers got the ball on the goal line.
dallas game, and it was to vd or walker

me and my homies were up north watching this game and we all decided that was the best play we've seen alex make, ever at that point :russ:
 

JLova

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,022
Reputation
4,632
Daps
182,315
dallas game, and it was to vd or walker

me and my homies were up north watching this game and we all decided that was the best play we've seen alex make, ever at that point :russ:

Word? I thought it was Frank that made it down to the endzone. But yea, that was a fukking great play by Alex.
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,887
Reputation
6,354
Daps
114,073
Reppin
Chile
527102_400469866687328_440784222_n.jpg


:wow:
 

Ronnie Lott

#49erGang
Joined
Jun 12, 2012
Messages
63,165
Reputation
10,380
Daps
225,538
Navarro bowman is gonna be that dude this yr on defense. Not sayin that patrick willis isn't gonna ball, but navarrow holds it down too
 

DrunkenNovice

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,209
Reputation
947
Daps
15,579
Navarro bowman is gonna be that dude this yr on defense. Not sayin that patrick willis isn't gonna ball, but navarrow holds it down too

From an interview I read willis said he's cool with taking less snaps as long as W's are coming in. I know its the "right" thing to say but, it shows good faith.

wait until we go against a team with an average passing game :lolbron:
 

B90X

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
3,807
Reputation
140
Daps
5,358
Reppin
NINER EMPIRE
dallas game, and it was to vd or walker

me and my homies were up north watching this game and we all decided that was the best play we've seen alex make, ever at that point :russ:

Word? I thought it was Frank that made it down to the endzone. But yea, that was a fukking great play by Alex.

It actually happened in 2 games. One was Dallas and the other was against the Eagles, I believe...
 

thatrapsfan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,340
Reputation
1,949
Daps
55,478
Reppin
NULL
People kept insisting Frank was washed up last year, despite the numbers showing otherwise....glad he proved them wrong again right from week 1. Dude still has it and the fact he has much less of a load to carry will keep him going for a while.
 
Top