Respectfully, Tom Holland has been outshined in every Spiderman film

Joined
Oct 31, 2017
Messages
1,069
Reputation
41
Daps
2,155
I like him when he does the action stuff which is what I watch Spiderman for. To be honest whenever I rewatch any of his movies, I hit ff whenever any MJ stuff is playing. It is serious cringe level for me.
 

Black Nate Grey

The God Emperor of Mankind
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
7,343
Reputation
3,166
Daps
29,959
Garfield was a horrible Peter Parker and an alright Spiderman.
Parker? Maybe.
Spider-man? No. He was definitely the most comic accurate spider-man. He had the best depiction.

Tom Holland's Spider-man is way too codependent on bigger figures. He has little independence.

Garfield's spider-man was fantastic.
This is quintessential Web-swinger. The way he mocks the criminal, has fun with it. His interaction with the police. His quips while he's swinging.
 

Megadeus

Superstar
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
6,474
Reputation
1,610
Daps
30,668
Garfield was the best Spiderman, easily. Captured his comic book swag perfectly. But he was not a great Peter Parker though.

Tom Holland is a decent spiderman and a ok Peter Parker.

I never watched spiderman 3 and I refuse to.... so Tobey McGuire is still ok in my book.:pachaha:

I like all of them TBH, theyre good in their own way. But as a poster before me stated, They are NEVER going to give TH a script where he's not relying on someone else from the MCU in case something falls through and they have to bush Spidey from the canon.
 

RennisDeynolds

I am untethered and my rage knows no bounds!
Joined
Feb 2, 2017
Messages
36,230
Reputation
5,224
Daps
105,985
Reppin
Paddys Pub
Parker? Maybe.
Spider-man? No. He was definitely the most comic accurate spider-man. He had the best depiction.

Tom Holland's Spider-man is way too codependent on bigger figures. He has little independence.

Garfield's spider-man was fantastic.
This is quintessential Web-swinger. The way he mocks the criminal, has fun with it. His interaction with the police. His quips while he's swinging.


Andrew Garfield and the Amazing movies are an abomination. Only good thing that came from that was the suit being playable in the PS4/PS5 game
 

Black Nate Grey

The God Emperor of Mankind
Joined
Jan 24, 2014
Messages
7,343
Reputation
3,166
Daps
29,959
Andrew Garfield and the Amazing movies are an abomination. Only good thing that came from that was the suit being playable in the PS4/PS5 game
What is lacking about this Spider-man performance?
I'm not talking about the plot, visuals, side characters, quality of the film, etc.

What about his performance of Spider-man makes it an abomination?
It's clear of everyone elses. Despite the movies failings.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,983
Reputation
3,081
Daps
70,571
Reppin
New York
Garfield was the best Spiderman, easily. Captured his comic book swag perfectly. But he was not a great Peter Parker though.

Tom Holland is a decent spiderman and a ok Peter Parker.

I never watched spiderman 3 and I refuse to.... so Tobey McGuire is still ok in my book.:pachaha:

I like all of them TBH, theyre good in their own way. But as a poster before me stated, They are NEVER going to give TH a script where he's not relying on someone else from the MCU in case something falls through and they have to bush Spidey from the canon.
That's how I feel. I understand preferring one over the other but the passion over this in here is funny. lol
 

Ironman

#Knickstape
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
Messages
62,493
Reputation
13,991
Daps
246,551
Reppin
Avengers compound
Parker? Maybe.
Spider-man? No. He was definitely the most comic accurate spider-man. He had the best depiction.

Tom Holland's Spider-man is way too codependent on bigger figures. He has little independence.

Garfield's spider-man was fantastic.
This is quintessential Web-swinger. The way he mocks the criminal, has fun with it. His interaction with the police. His quips while he's swinging.



2:43-3:00 is straight up comic to bigscreen:wow::wow::wow::wow::wow:
 
Top