Republicans try to use the Dred Scott case to say Kamala Harris can't run for President.

Strapped

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
43,423
Reputation
1,526
Daps
53,434
Reppin
404
Fuk Bois on the coli says there is no racism & we can't talk about it
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,711
Reputation
8,234
Daps
157,265

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,711
Reputation
8,234
Daps
157,265

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
25,004
Reputation
3,274
Daps
56,463
The bigger question is why hasn't the Dred Scott decision been officially overturned by the Supreme Court yet?
 

Pull Up the Roots

I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,597
Reputation
7,276
Daps
91,580
Reppin
Detroit
The bigger question is why hasn't the Dred Scott decision been officially overturned by the Supreme Court yet?
"The decision of Scott v. Sandford, considered by many legal scholars to be the worst ever rendered by the Supreme Court, was overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution, which abolished slavery and declared all persons born in the United States to be citizens of the United States."

 

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
25,004
Reputation
3,274
Daps
56,463
"The decision of Scott v. Sandford, considered by many legal scholars to be the worst ever rendered by the Supreme Court, was overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution, which abolished slavery and declared all persons born in the United States to be citizens of the United States."


no that is an amendment to the constitution and word play. I want to know why the Supreme Court has not overturned this ruling specifically? It is still cited.
There is more to that ruling than just becoming a citizen. The 1 drop rule for instance and a lot more is comprised in that ruling, it should be overturned officially and for some reason it hasn't been. Since they have refused to officially overturned it, this decision is the main argument for FBA's to use to distinguish themselves as a lineage to achieve reparations because it can still be cited as a ruling to this very day.

 

Pull Up the Roots

I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,597
Reputation
7,276
Daps
91,580
Reppin
Detroit
no that is an amendment to the constitution and word play. I want to know why the Supreme Court has not overturned this ruling specifically? It is still cited.
There is more to that ruling than just becoming a citizen. The 1 drop rule for instance and a lot more is comprised in that ruling, it should be overturned officially and for some reason it hasn't been. Since they have refused to officially overturned it, this decision is the main argument for FBA's to use to distinguish themselves as a lineage to achieve reparations because it can still be cited as a ruling to this very day.


It's not wordplay. The Dred Scott decision was nullified by the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery, and the 14th Amendment granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States, which overrode the key ruling in Dred Scott that Black people could not be citizens. The 13th and 14th amendments voided its legal validity. You won't find any court citing Dred Scott as a precedent. It holds no legal weight, same with the "one-drop rule" and other aspects of the decision. They have long since been discredited and hold no legal authority today. It's why the Republican group citing it resulted in ridicule. They would be laughed out of court trying to present such a case.
 

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
25,004
Reputation
3,274
Daps
56,463
It's not wordplay. The Dred Scott decision was nullified by the 13th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery, and the 14th Amendment granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States, which overrode the key ruling in Dred Scott that Black people could not be citizens. The 13th and 14th amendments voided its legal validity. You won't find any court citing Dred Scott as a precedent. It holds no legal weight, same with the "one-drop rule" and other aspects of the decision. They have long since been discredited and hold no legal authority today. It's why the Republican group citing it resulted in ridicule. They would be laughed out of court trying to present such a case.
It is no different than plessy vs ferguson which also defied the 13th and 14th amendment. Both Dred and plessy should both be officially overturned and deemed unconstitutional by the current Supreme Court just like they did with Affirmative Action in education policies and Roe v Wade.
 
Top