Republicans Try to Cut Food Stamps as 15% of U.S. Households Face Hunger

Chris.B

Banned
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
18,922
Reputation
-4,609
Daps
21,893
its pretty sad that the "middle class" is just as greedy and selfish as the 1%. Anybody agreeing with purposely starving people has serious issues. More reasons why this country will continue to crumble, there's no unity. The States of America is a more fitting name for this country.
I personally know a generation of a family who have been on food stamps since the program was created...At some point people like those need to be cut off.

Food stamp should not feed you for life
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,173
Reputation
3,722
Daps
158,755
Reppin
Brooklyn
Editorial
Mindlessly Gutting Food Stamps
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: September 8, 2013

Among the many scars of the recession, the most intolerable should be the pangs of chronic hunger that still assail a stunning 14.5 percent of the nation’s households, according to the Department of Agriculture’s latest survey. A decade ago, the figure was 11 percent — a group defined as regularly suffering food “insecurity,” or having 26 percent less to spend on food than households not going hungry. The survey shows that food insecurity rose with the recession and has remained stubbornly high.

Related
Today's Editorials
NYT_Twitter_opinion.png

Connect With Us on Twitter
For Op-Ed, follow @nytopinion and to hear from the editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, follow @andyrNYT.

Instead of providing aid for the hungry, House Republicans want to reduce the food stamp program — the most basic part of the social safety net — with $40 billion in cuts across the next decade. A showdown vote over this cruel plan is expected this month. The House majority leader, Eric Cantor, is leading a propaganda drive that invokes reform as its cause while blaming the victims of hunger simply because the food stamp rolls had to double to nearly 48 million people in the crunch of recession.

The Cantor plan would force an estimated four to six million people to lose the food stamps that now sustain them. It would invite state governments to ratchet benefits back further because they could use savings wrenched from the pantries of the poor for various other programs, including tax cuts. The measure’s “work requirements” provide no job training funds yet mandate that able-bodied, childless adults who cannot find at least part-time employment will lose their food stamps after 90 days, even if the local unemployment rate is prohibitively high.

Even without the House conservatives’ turning of the screw, the hunger of the working poor was starkly described by Sheryl Gay Stolberg in The Times last week from Tennessee. Parents told of how they must regularly skip meals to feed their children and hunt game when the food stamp allotment falls short of monthly needs.

The falsehood that cutting food stamps is about saving government money is evident when the House plans rich increases in crop insurance subsidies for farmers. Representative Stephen Fincher of Tennessee, a Tea Party favorite who wants food stamps cut, collected nearly $3.5 million in government farm subsidies from 1999 to 2012. Yet he declared in a debate over food stamps, “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.”

The Republicans play up a few abusers of the program to mask the central fact of their plan: the tens of millions of Americans who rely on food stamps are children, the disabled, the elderly and low-wage families. For their sake, Congress should reject the Cantor proposal as the national embarrassment it plainly is.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/09/opinion/mindlessly-gutting-food-stamps.html?src=recg
 

You Win Perfect

bow down
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
14,993
Reputation
-1,969
Daps
39,297
I personally know a generation of a family who have been on food stamps since the program was created...At some point people like those need to be cut off.

Food stamp should not feed you for life


not everybody is going to "make it in America" and that is a fact. Like I said the middle class is just as uppity as the rich folk. That's cool that you know ONE generation of a family that have been on food stamps. So lets generalize everybody as frauds and losers that can't afford to put food on the table.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,968
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,058
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
I'm almost convince libertarians are borderline sociopaths.
actually we are against the use of force and advocate liberty and personal freedom... vile I know :hamster:

How is it logical that automatically cutting food stamps is going to "force bums to get a job"? There is no way to prove that. Another outcome could be that these same people will come into your house looking for food while you're worried about saving a few dollars.

While we're talking about cutting funding, why don't we put everything on the table? All the money that we shell out to a few select defense companies is the biggest welfare plan going. We have no problem giving billions to Wall Street when they already have billions. Oh wait they have the lobby to convince us the world would end if we didn't.

I'm totally against people taking advantage of the system, but don't act like that doesn't happen in everything. You can find some anecdotal evidence to support any cause.

:upsetfavre: It would be gradual, with some sort of net(unemployment) always being available, as well as charity.

and Libertarians are for military spending cuts.... :ld:

is @DEAD7 a troll? i've not been around here long to read ppl. i get thrown off when someone with a black pic posts this bullsh1t...
I find the idea some one must subscribe to a certain ideology or political/economic school of thought based on the pigment of their skin beyond ignorant :snoop:
Im gonna pray for you :to:


its pretty sad that the "middle class" is just as greedy and selfish as the 1%. Anybody agreeing with purposely starving people has serious issues. More reasons why this country will continue to crumble, there's no unity. The States of America is a more fitting name for this country.
NEWS FLASH: people are greedy.

and what everyone wants adds up to more than there is, that's the reason we need an economy in the first place.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
737
Reputation
20
Daps
530
Most importantly, black people are disproportionately poor. I want the government to think of better ways to help poor blacks. I don't think starving them out of having children helps black people. In fact I know it doesn't. That just further reduces our number while helping white numbers, since most whites are middle class.
I'm pretty sure that has a lot to do with how these bills get passed.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,968
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,058
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Nobody that is libertarian has ever been poor. Like ACTUAL poor, not "Well I guess I have to eat ramen while earning my useless poli-sci degree" poor.
Thoughtless comments like this crack me up... As if poor people can't believe in personal responsibility, liberty, and disdain the use of force...
 

ltheghost

Payin Debts.... N40
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
6,503
Reputation
480
Daps
7,435
Reppin
Japan, but from the 989
All this means is that poor and low income people are going to get shytted on. Damn those Republicans are ruthless. Even though the same poor and ignorant people vote for these soulless vampires. This is fukked up......so when are we going to bomb Syria? Can't feed the poor here but lets go bomb some middle eastern people.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,943
Daps
120,888
Reppin
Behind You
SInce the main driving force behind these types of measures is to curtail the people that are gaming the system maybe it is time to give serious thought to taking welfare back to its roots.

Back in the day getting on welfare and receiving any types of food stamps or public assistance required some actual effort on the behalf of the people asking for the help and a modicum of oversight from the government. They need to bring back the welfare social worker who actually monitors their clients (welfare recipient) and helps them navigate through the down financial time that they need assistance while working to get off of assistance simultaneosly.
It should never be a situation where you get on welfare and that is the end of your contact with another human being from the government. Getting assistance from the government should come with strings in the form of mandatory training programs, mandatory job seeking goals, a timetable that one can be on the assistance, etc.

But just tossing people in the bushes and removing help for them when they are incapable of helping themselves is just cruel and also just a cheap ploy by Republicans to make it look like they are serious about balancing the budget and cutting government spending when they are really just looking for ways to distract the public from asking why corporate welfare continues unabated.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,690
Daps
35,653
Reppin
NULL
I personally know a generation of a family who have been on food stamps since the program was created...At some point people like those need to be cut off.

Food stamp should not feed you for life

I agree that there should be some sort of accountability and/or cutoff program for food stamps.
 
Top