Report: American Education Isn't Mediocre—It's Deeply Unequal (Among States)

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,692
Reputation
4,889
Daps
68,697
Report: American Education Isn't Mediocre—It's Deeply Unequal
Students in Massachusetts are doing great compared to their international peers, according to the National Center for Educational Statistics. Students in Alabama, Mississippi, and D.C., however, are languishing.
JULIA RYAN OCT 24 2013, 10:25 AM ET

It’s so common to see studies about the United States’s lackluster academic performance compared to other countries, it’s barely newsworthy anymore. The American education system, the story goes, is mediocre. A new report from the National Center for Educational Statistics complicates that picture a bit. It attempts to rank how individual states compare internationally, and ends up showing a wide gap between the highest-performing states and the lowest: Massachusetts does quite well against other countries, while Mississippi, Alabama, and the District of Columbia do poorly.
The report evaluates 2011 math and science scores from two sources: the National Assessment of Educational Process, which was administered to eighth graders in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Department of Defense schools; and from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, which evaluated eighth graders in 38 different countries and 9 “subnational entities” (for example, Quebec and Dubai).

Only some states took the TIMMS to create the U.S. score, so for the U.S. states that did not take the TIMSS in 2011, the report used NAEP scores to predict the what the state’s TIMSS scores would have been. The researchers then used these predictions to rank the states against the other educational systems tested by TIMSS.

The average TIMSS score is a 500, and the test uses four benchmarks—low, intermediate, high, and advanced—to describe student scores. In math, two-thirds of U.S. states scored above the TIMSS average.

aa2f68664.jpg

Massachusetts was the highest-scoring state in math, coming in behind four educational systems—Republic of Korea, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, and Hong Kong—and outranking 42 education systems. The lowest-ranking state, Alabama, outperformed only 19 educational systems.

831b7e1b3.png

a0f4bbdf6.png

3b519e95e.png

In science, 47 states scored above the TIMMS average:

bc15b8518.png

Massachusetts and Vermont outperformed 43 educational systems, while the District of Columbia ranked above only 14 educational systems. Singapore was the only education system to outrank all U.S. states.

b0f123c41.png

e724ae722.png

118054220.png
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,384
Reputation
18,450
Daps
235,852
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
In the DMV you see the disparities from county to county. I was lucky enough to get a Montgomery County education, one of the best school districts in the country and an overall wealthy place. PG and DC is trash tho, NoVA got good schools too cuz of all the money they got.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
150,784
Reputation
27,838
Daps
508,140
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
In the DMV you see the disparities from county to county. I was lucky enough to get a Montgomery County education, one of the best school districts in the country and an overall wealthy place. PG and DC is trash tho, NoVA got good schools too cuz of all the money they got.

It's common sense if you think about it

the more "wealthy" a place is, the more the residents usually tend to have higher education credentials equaling more of a focus on education with their kids. It's not really rocket science. Those areas tend to care more about their children's educations and not just by their mouth, but moreso by action.
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,384
Reputation
18,450
Daps
235,852
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
It's common sense if you think about it

the more "wealthy" a place is, the more the residents usually tend to have higher education credentials equaling more of a focus on education with their kids. It's not really rocket science. Those areas tend to care more about their children's educations and not just by their mouth, but moreso by action.

It's taxes too. I kinda realized that in high school cuz I was bussed to a school in arguably the wealthiest town in the county so I saw how different the standards were just between the schools I had known and what I was now seeing in the rich part of town. More money can be put up in certain districts, plus alumni/as that got more will be more likely to donate to their old school. The point is at the end of the day it all comes right back to the money.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
150,784
Reputation
27,838
Daps
508,140
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
It's taxes too. I kinda realized that in high school cuz I was bussed to a school in arguably the wealthiest town in the county so I saw how different the standards were just between the schools I had known and what I was now seeing in the rich part of town. More money can be put up in certain districts, plus alumni/as that got more will be more likely to donate to their old school. The point is at the end of the day it all comes right back to the money.

Totally agree.

my only thing is that you can throw all the money you want at lower performing schools and areas, but if the parental support and focus on education isn't there, it doesn't mean shyt. If education isn't a priority at home, it doesn't matter. That's the biggest issue IMO. Areas where education is more valued due to the parents having higher education (And thus more money since they are in better areas social economics wise) will be better.

Teachers can only do so much. My mother in law is a retired teacher and the differences between kids when she first started teaching in the early 70s up until she retired in the mid 00s was like night and day to her. She taught in a black elementary school and the way that the teachers have been handcuffed along with the unruliness of the kids in her later years made her tap out. The parents taking the sides of kids and shyt instead of vice versa like it used to be. Forcing kids to be passed to the next grade because of no child left behind or losing your federal school funding (you'd be a fool to think this shyt was just happening in Atlanta - no one wants to or can afford to lose that federal bread) was the straw that broke the camel's back for many old school teachers. They can't do shyt.

Even if you doubled the amount of money spent on a child in the more impoverished areas, it's not gonna change what goes on at home (the core issue IMO). Single parents who have little time (or don't make the time) to focus on their kids educations, kids in fukked areas, kids being easily impressionable with negativity in spots, all of that isn't a good recipe. Kids act out alot looking for love and attention and those kids who do act unruly in school can easily take down the ones who do want to focus on their schoolwork.

Hate for the rant, but while money is a big key, it's not THE key. You look at poorer areas around the world and the way those kids value education even in shyttier circumstances than here. We have to value it in all socio-economical situations. Not just the ones who have the better situations.
 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,384
Reputation
18,450
Daps
235,852
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
Totally agree.

my only thing is that you can throw all the money you want at lower performing schools and areas, but if the parental support and focus on education isn't there, it doesn't mean shyt. If education isn't a priority at home, it doesn't matter. That's the biggest issue IMO. Areas where education is more valued due to the parents having higher education (And thus more money since they are in better areas social economics wise) will be better.

Teachers can only do so much. My mother in law is a retired teacher and the differences between kids when she first started teaching in the early 70s up until she retired in the mid 00s was like night and day to her. She taught in a black elementary school and the way that the teachers have been handcuffed along with the unruliness of the kids in her later years made her tap out. The parents taking the sides of kids and shyt instead of vice versa like it used to be. Forcing kids to be passed to the next grade because of no child left behind or losing your federal school funding (you'd be a fool to think this shyt was just happening in Atlanta - no one wants to or can afford to lose that federal bread) was the straw that broke the camel's back for many old school teachers. They can't do shyt.

Even if you doubled the amount of money spent on a child in the more impoverished areas, it's not gonna change what goes on at home (the core issue IMO). Single parents who have little time (or don't make the time) to focus on their kids educations, kids in fukked areas, kids being easily impressionable with negativity in spots, all of that isn't a good recipe. Kids act out alot looking for love and attention and those kids who do act unruly in school can easily take down the ones who do want to focus on their schoolwork.

Hate for the rant, but while money is a big key, it's not THE key. You look at poorer areas around the world and the way those kids value education even in shyttier circumstances than here. We have to value it in all socio-economical situations. Not just the ones who have the better situations.

Good point, and honestly the single home was what fukked me and a lot of people like me over.

You can never really simplify something like this into one particular cause. But with that said, good teachers tend to reach even some of the worst students (special ed/behavior cases aside) so it could be a big help if at least the kids that tested the worst ended up with the best teachers. Have them each an equal spread of students, all the best teachers would be teaching AP courses or some super hard shyt unless they wanted to teach the worse kids by choice. But other than that you're right, the money can't make up for a broken home. I just think it'd help even the odds for the next generation at least.
 
Top