Don't worry when those Democrat Reparation studies are finally done in 2052. They'll finally cut the check.You a$$holes know the democrats on capitol hill can put their weight behind things on a federal level like they do for everyone else right???but hey whatever you say bruh..
Biden has been mentioned in this thread. Don't be blind to some people using this local issue as a soapbox for the broader DNC.
unicourt.com
Which side is attempting to stop these actual tangibles. Just say it.biden got our back. i’m not worried one iota.
Not probably, they did. I don't get the "Democrats do nothing" shyt which then when some Dems make an attempt to do exactly what folks want, Republicans come doing what they do, Dems gotta take the slander. The case was just filed and folks show their whole cynical ass.The democrats were probably the ones who started the reparations program there in the first place.
Brother I don't think this helps your point. He was a Trump nominee, not appointee.
Also, the bolded is where you fukked up basically doing the same thing. The lawsuit has *just* popped up on may 23rd, so what is this thing about them being toothless? This is new. Also, you want to know something else?
Flinn et al v. City of Evanston
On 05/23/2024 Flinn filed a Civil Right - Other Civil Right court case against City of Evanston in U.S. District Courts. Court records for this case are available from Illinois Northern District Court.
This is the case. Assigned to judge John F. Kness.
Soooooo while judges are meant to be non-partisan, he is a Trump appointee that may affect Evanston's reparations effort. This is being decided in a Federal District court in Illinois, so it isn't something that Evanston residents desires can override. This case literally sets precedent, and a Trump appointee has it.
So, again, what does this have to do with the democratically elected officials? This same activist group failed the first time and succeeded the second time on getting a case that may be heard but its not currently being deliberated as it literally just filed less than 30 days ago.
And if he is not nominated, can they conjure him out of thin air? Trump nominated him, he was voted in (yay by 29 Dems, 12 nays, unanimous Rs). If you check the record of any judges, especially before more recent polarization, a bunch are nominated with some bipartisan votes because these are meant to be non-partisan positions. Meant to be and actually are can be two different things. If Trump wasn't in office, that guy may not have been the nominee. You made a distinction without a real difference.
This is the thing, we don't know if he is a shytty judge, we just know that Reparations is finally up in the judicial spotlight and we may have a problem. Elections have consequences and this is a consequence of Trump winning. Also, talking about those 29 yays as if they were the deciding votes. If all 41 Dems who voted went nay, he still has 51 republicans and 1 independent to say yes. His voting record may be stellar but this is where the rubber meets the road.He got the votes of both Democrats AND Republicans. All 12 nays were democrats. You just know if the reverse was happening all Republicans would vote nay to frustrate the president. Yet here we are, the Dems working with Republicans on shytty Trump nominees.
What Democrats do you want to see fired up? You are expanding the scope for a local issue. And do you watch a 24/7 new cycle??? I honestly don't know who says what outside of Evanston. I work in Evanston so I see what happens locally, but if folks ain't local, what issue would this bump off of every politicians plates to support it first? The issue just hit the courts. It was successfully applied for 3 years. What Democrats do you want to support it?
Yeah you right. Dems and Republicans vote for and believe in the same things. The bills and voting records prove it. Thurgood Marshall dumb ass thought being a liberal Democrat meant something.Exactly,I dont blame the Dems in the sense they can stop anybody racist/petty enough to sue. But I just dont see how it would be any different with Democrats in office. Would idiots suddenly be unable to sue? Sounds like some brainstorming is needed that they arent committed too. They sure will get that money to Ukraine and Israel though. Poured drugs into our communities to get money to the Contras. When it comes to politicians,It seems like where theres a will theres a way
One day Neo Nazi's and the KKK will realize this too.
Yeah you right. Dems and Republicans vote for and believe in the same things. The bills and voting records prove it. Thurgood Marshall dumb ass thought being a liberal Democrat meant something.
?
So are Democrats the ones who are striking down these efforts?Instead of the sarcasm,explain how this would not have happened with Dems at the helm
Soooooo, who decides the outcome of lawsuits?
Now we getting somewhere. Point me to Democratic judges agreeing who these lawsuits. I will cashapp you money if you do.
Look up the definition of liberal breh
