This is why yall Boule nikkas be looking funny in the light to regular bp, the striving for white-adjacency, with the expectation that we're all supposed to support you (rhetorically, whatever).
How does this pertain to RL whose money has sent countless black kids to college for free and has seeded countless black entrepreneurial ventures?
I'm not gonna bash a trailblazer like Reginald Lewis for his familial choices but I'll say the same thing I've said looking at Diana Ross, Donna Summer and even some of the Jackson's children: it does feel crazy knowing that not before long there will be white descendants in charge of their legacy
LOL, at some of my favorite posters going at each other in this thread...I guess I will opine.
I don't think we should make a moral argument about how any given individual should marry and I won't name or disparage anybody for doing so.
In my mind the work of Lewis' widow and daughters are outstanding and make them great members of our community in my book.
I think the bigger issue is the changing role of the Black elite and ideas of legitimacy in the Black (and other) communities. I read an article a few years back about how many very rich people surveyed felt they had more in common with other rich people, regardless of race/ethnicity/nationality etc., than with the middle or poorer classes of their ethnicity.
Black American elites were long the exception to this because of segregation. Even though there were differences between the rich Black in Bronzeville and the poor sharecropper in the Delta, they both faced similar circumscribed social networks and often went to HBCUs if they attended college, etc. That has been weakening since the 1960s and the pro-Black actions aside, many rich Black people have had to burnish their cosmopolitan credentials, if for no other reasons to rise in a world where Black people are almost non-existent. It's even harder for the kids--at least self-made rich Blacks came up in Black neighborhoods and society. Often their children aren't in Black areas, schools with very few Blacks, and then a PWI. J&J every two weeks is something but it is more to help those who want Black fellowship, it can't force identity.
This may not seem a big deal and they often give back to Black society through philanthropy, HBCUs (the Lewis daughters do both a lot with VSU, coding camps, the AAMH in DC etc.), but as rich Blacks become more similar to non-Blacks in their class, their legitimacy in the eyes of Black society could weaken, right or wrong. In the past this has caused social ruptures if elites are felt as "out of touch" while the masses see their position deteriorate.
Witness what we have seen happen to Kamala Harris, who went to a HBCU, became an AKA, and joined the Links. This checks the boxes for elite Black society and everyone (including her) thought this was necessary and sufficient. However, the way she has moved (or been perceived to move) relative to the dominant society along with her husband has made her seem disconnected from the Black community more than would have been likely during the 1960s. Back then rich Blacks supporting her would have instantly garnered her legitimacy, now to their surprise things are not so clear cut.
So you can't answer? What's the point of saluting black excellence if it never benefits black people? Can you name a single black billionaire who's not a future Caucasian? Just ONE.
Honestly I can, but if you say a Black Billionaire that married a Black wife/husband, didn't divorce, didn't re-marry non-Black, and their kids married Black, then yeah the list gets a lot thinner. I would put David Steward of World Wide Technology in this category though his daughter Kimberly Steward hasn't married. Jay-Z is the other (Tyler Perry didn't marry but has a kid with a Black woman) but we'll see what the kids do. Besides that the list is mostly Black Africans I think.
Honestly, for all the barbs at the boule, at least in my experience, old money Black kids typically marry Black much more often than the kids of new money Blacks. I can't say why.
The expectation that love, which transcends time and space, should be halted because of race, is shallow. Come on now, we're adults.
Yes, love is love and it is not good to "force" people to marry anybody. However, I really want to say it doesn't matter but in a macro sense it can. Communities attain wealth by 1) acquiring assets and increasing their value 2) investing or 3) inheritance (I'll leave violence and theft out though this happens too; reparations hasn't happened so I am not relying on that as a factor). If #3 is neglected than we have Black people relying on #1 and #2 every generation to build wealth. Part of the issue is the Black community is wealth-wise the most unequal in America so a disproportionate amount of our wealth is in the1% and 0.1%. So their moves affect wealth overall more than their White counterparts.
I guess we can say it isn't fair the well-off should burden this as far as their marriage decisions because of the Black wealth issue compared to regular people but there is an impact regardless. In recent years, 50% of mixed Black women and 80% of mixed Black men in the younger ages have kids with non-Blacks and that is in the general population---at high wealth and income those numbers go even higher. So having a non-Black spouse as a rich Black person close to guarantees you will have non-Black grandchildren. If there is a counter-example I am all ears. How will they relate to the Black community? Does Jennifer Beals continue to hang with Chicago Black society and give back?
Granted I have always wondered in my head the following: most rich families (of all races) blow their founder's wealth in 3-4 generations. Even if a large percentage of the wealthy Blacks swirl and are non-Black by generation three, a significant percentage of those that marry Black and have Black kids will lose the money too. Granted non-Black descendants means 100% of the wealth won't be in Black hands versus at least a chance with Black descendants. But this is a topic for another thread.