refusing to engage in dialog about something, is in essence true bigotry?

[GoddamnyamanProf]

By having these debates for ppl to watch you are trying to sway the viewers, not necessarily the person in front of you. By ignoring or refusing to argue points or showing proof and substantiation further weakens your side.

No it doesn't. Any decent human being isnt "on the fence" about these issues so there's nothing to weaken.

Trying to trojan horse your way into a legit platform for hate and ignorance, under the transparent guise of free speech, is pathetic and obvious to anyone not down with your doomed cause.

to suppress any form of intellectual bigotry, you're undermining the required individual's obligation to reason, debate, process new information, and update old information

Thats because its common sense that anyone promoting, entertaining, or defending "intellectual bigotry" (i.e. you) plainly has no obligation to reason. You dont get to sit at the grown up table when your worldview is toxic nonsense.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

When asking folks to defend their arguments/views/stance is countered with "bu bu it's clear they racist/white supremacist, so I won't waste my time," that counter exposes your fear of being humiliated for not knowing what and why do you have certain views

As we all know, the entire country functions with under currents of racial tension. But we also know many of us cherry pick when to draw from that reservoir to benefit
-our own,
-political party's,
-spouse selection's,
-favorite cac's,
-socioeconomic ideology's,
and religion's
agenda. So why not strive for a way to prevent us from using identity politics as a crutch to evade an individual's obligation to reason, debate, process new information, and update old information

Suggesting this exercise is truth seeking is false.

you are replying to the wrong post cause that's my point

No it doesn't. Any decent human being isnt "on the fence" about these issues so there's nothing to weaken.

Trying to trojan horse your way into a legit platform for hate and ignorance, under the transparent guise of free speech, is pathetic and obvious to anyone not down with your doomed cause.
Thats because its common sense that anyone promoting, entertaining, or defending "intellectual bigotry" (i.e. you) plainly has no obligation to reason. You dont get to sit at the grown up table when your worldview is toxic nonsense.

what is "intellectual bigotry"?
how am I promoting, entertaining, and defending it?

 

[AndroidHero]

So am I a bigot if I don't want to debate people who think I'm inferior?

 

[Mowgli]

if you beat a person long enough, you could convince him you're the pope's long lost son
I'm not sure how coercion and truth seeking are related

How much time would u spend having dialogue with a psychopath before you realize youre talking to a psychopath.

We arent talking about someone who says "hey my preference is this and id like my kids to have kids with these people"

We are talking about people who feel that groups of another race are inferior and deserve mistreatment because of delusions of their own superiority.

Lets dialogue with charles manson and see if Helter Skelter holds up to peer review.

A true bigot is a true bigot..

Do we dialogue with @l quaid@? No. The government kills and jails them because they couple their ideology with violence.

Whites have a soft spot for historically violent groups like neo nazis and Klan members for obvious reasons and this sadly is when they , lose their minds and expect rarional people to want dialogue with t3rr0rists.

 

[Maschine_Man]

No it doesn't. Any decent human being isnt "on the fence" about these issues so there's nothing to weaken.

Trying to trojan horse your way into a legit platform for hate and ignorance, under the transparent guise of free speech, is pathetic and obvious to anyone not down with your doomed cause.
Thats because its common sense that anyone promoting, entertaining, or defending "intellectual bigotry" (i.e. you) plainly has no obligation to reason. You dont get to sit at the grown up table when your worldview is toxic nonsense.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

When asking folks to defend their arguments/views/stance is countered with "bu bu it's clear they racist/white supremacist, so I won't waste my time," that counter exposes your fear of being humiliated for not knowing what and why do you have certain views

No, idiot, nobody's scared that a racist will use amazing facts and airtight arguments to prove that racism is smart and good and we should all embrace it For your woldview to operate on such a moronic pretense is something of a tragedy. You're convinced that if people just give ignorance and hate a chance, most people will be dumb enough to latch onto it, as you have. Most people aren't quite that dim. Try to smarten up and it'll make sense rather than keep frustrating you.

what is "intellectual bigotry"?


how am I promoting, entertaining, and defending it?

I'm using your term, purposely. You brought it up, and specifically as a catch-all of all the hateful, toxic things you're in every thread defending w the remaining alt right trash posters. So you wrote it - If you're looking for a definition, go ahead and define it.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

oh boy...hold on to your hats and belongings folks, we finna go down this woefully excessive liberalism rabbit hole

Notice, neither the videos or this thread , based the discussion about not debating other folks on race, while not shying away from it when it is brought up. It's no coincidence those who are opposed to debating folks, no matter what, brings up race and extreme examples as to why it's acceptable not to debate. Despite countless examples of them avoiding debates that has nothing to do with race




bu bu you used the word bigot, so you are using racial terms..damn shame I have to explain this
Definition of BIGOT

: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices;

Despite the sloppy usage by the media, the word bigot doesn't have anything to do with gender, race, or religion. Thus why it has synonyms like zealot, dogmatist, and fanatic. It's until you connect a word like "racial", then it becomes about race



So an intellectual bigot is a person who is intolerant of opposing views/arguments/ideologies regardless of topics


I gave the benefit of the doubt to @Mowgli when he used it, assuming he was using it in its proper context, but after his followup post, I was wrong and confused, like he is

 

[Mowgli]

oh boy...hold on to your hats and belongings folks, we finna go down this woefully excessive liberalism rabbit hole

Notice, neither the videos or this thread , based the discussion about not debating other folks on race, while not shying away from it when it is brought up. It's no coincidence those who are opposed to debating folks, no matter what, brings up race and extreme examples as to why it's acceptable not to debate. Despite countless examples of them avoiding debates that has nothing to do with race




bu bu you used the word bigot, so you are using racial terms..damn shame I have to explain this
Definition of BIGOT


Despite the sloppy usage by the media, the word bigot doesn't have anything to do with gender, race, or religion. Thus why it has synonyms like zealot, dogmatist, and fanatic. It's until you connect a word like "racial", then it becomes about race



So an intellectual bigot is a person who is intolerant of opposing views/arguments/ideologies regardless of topics


I gave the benefit of the doubt to @Mowgli when he used it, assuming he was using it in its proper context, but after his followup post, I was wrong and confused, like he is

Finish the definition from your own source.

especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

If you cant be honest with yourself you cant be honest with people you want to have an intellectual conversation with.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

So am I a bigot if I don't want to debate people who think I'm inferior?

Sir/madam, I'm 100% sure that you've
fawked,
voted for,
been entertained by,
taught by,
taught about,
been hired by,
had good convos with,
had the door open by,
been driven by,
and/or
received a prescription from

people who think you're inferior.
Why is debating them any different? especially when 99.99% of your debates will be about policies/politics, topics that affect us all

Historically minds are changed with blood.

How much time would u spend having dialogue with a psychopath before you realize youre talking to a psychopath.

We arent talking about someone who says "hey my preference is this and id like my kids to have kids with these people"

We are talking about people who feel that groups of another race are inferior and deserve mistreatment because of delusions of their own superiority.

Lets dialogue with charles manson and see if Helter Skelter holds up to peer review.

A true bigot is a true bigot..

Do we dialogue with @l quaid@? No. The government kills and jails them because they couple their ideology with violence.

Whites have a soft spot for historically violent groups like neo nazis and Klan members for obvious reasons and this sadly is when they , lose their minds and expect rarional people to want dialogue with t3rr0rists.

Please only answer the following questions regarding your post and flow of logic in order to prove to me that you're not merging random talking points together to dap fish and to deflect in order to avoid being exposed as not knowing what you talmbowt

how is talking to Charles Manson and coercion related?
how is coercion and truth seeking related?

No, idiot, nobody's scared that a racist will use amazing facts and airtight arguments to prove that racism is smart and good and we should all embrace it For your woldview to operate on such a moronic pretense is something of a tragedy. You're convinced that if people just give ignorance and hate a chance, most people will be dumb enough to latch onto it, as you have. Most people aren't quite that dim. Try to smarten up and it'll make sense rather than keep frustrating you.

lol. Don't try to make it seem like you're talking to KKK members and Charles Manson types about the tenants of human evolution

Your kind uses "bu bu it's clear they racist/white supremacist, so I won't waste my time," when talmbot any topic that you're not comfortable with and cannot articulate factual based counter arguments for

As your post in this thread shows, yall use labels and deflections to manipulate the uniformed and sheeples of society to apply stereotypes that will fill in the gaps of their ignorance about a topic

I'm using your term, purposely. You brought it up, and specifically as a catch-all of all the hateful, toxic things you're in every thread defending w the remaining alt right trash posters. So you wrote it - If you're looking for a definition, go ahead and define it.

So even with access to the innanet, you still don't know what intellectual bigotry is, accredited a term to me that actually has a specific meaning, and continue to wrongly summarize my stance to fit a prepackaged narrative that will allow you to to counter with non-related talking points

How are you finna solve problems while being willfully ignorant?

Your hazardous comfort with willful ignorance is why an individual's obligation should be to reason, debate, process new information, and update old information

Your obligation shouldn't be a sheep for a party and ideology, so that you have a counter argument on deck for anything your opposition says, regardless is its factual or not

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

Finish the definition from your own source.

especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.

If you cant be honest with yourself you cant be honest with people you want to have an intellectual conversation with.

yes a type of bigot. Like a type of zealot, dogmatist, and fantatic

So even with the clear definition, you still don't understand that the word bigot has nothing to do with gender,race, and religion
So at what point do you remove the training wheels to learn the importance of effective communication as an adult, you will need to respect the meaning of words by using them appropriately and stop blindly following the sloppy tomfoolery of the media

 

[Mowgli]

yes a type of bigot. Like a type of zealot, dogmatist, and fantatic

So even with the clear definition, you still don't understand that the word bigot has nothing to do with gender,race, and religion
So at what point do you remove the training wheels to learn the importance of effective communication as an adult, you will need to respect the meaning of words by using them appropriately and stop blindly following the sloppy tomfoolery of the media

If im talking to a white supremacist i dont need to understand if he means nikka with the a or nikka with the er, fukk how he says it ill put him in the ER.

So bigot only means one thing when talking to a white supremacist. I dont need to dance and argue the semantics of words because we all know what we are trying to communicate, the fact we dont care to dialogue with white supremacists.

 

[Mowgli]

A white supremacist can fully understand the concept of Zionism and plays dumb when talking about white supremacy intellecutally while bragging about the supremacy of whites screaming white power when hes mad.

Youve been downloaded and decoded for some time. Just trolls.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

If im talking to a white supremacist i dont need to understand if he means nikka with the a or nikka with the er, fukk how he says it ill put him in the ER.

So bigot only means one thing when talking to a white supremacist. I dont need to dance and argue the semantics of words because we all know what we are trying to communicate, the fact we dont care to dialogue with white supremacists.

nikka please, you vote for and work with white supremacist. foh
A bigot means what it means, regardless of who you talking with

Now it makes sense, you nikkas don't know what bigot meant, you seen the word in the thread title. Yall got geeked, then tried to derail the thread with extreme racial examples that has nothing to do with the video and the thread's points. This is why knowing the semantics of words is important so that you are not exposed for being an ignoranmous

 

[Mowgli]

nikka please, you vote for and work with white supremacist. foh
A bigot means what it means, regardless of who you talking with

Now it makes sense, you nikkas don't know what bigot meant, you seen the word in the thread title. Yall got geeked, then tried to derail the thread with extreme racial examples that has nothing to do with the video and the thread's points. This is why knowing the semantics of words is important so that you are not exposed for being an ignoranmous

Youve checked out. Negged.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

A white supremacist can fully understand the concept of Zionism and plays dumb when talking about white supremacy intellecutally while bragging about the supremacy of whites screaming white power when hes mad.

Youve been downloaded and decoded for some time. Just trolls.

yeah yeah yeah...whabowtdisherenikka

Historically minds are changed with blood.

How much time would u spend having dialogue with a psychopath before you realize youre talking to a psychopath.

We arent talking about someone who says "hey my preference is this and id like my kids to have kids with these people"

We are talking about people who feel that groups of another race are inferior and deserve mistreatment because of delusions of their own superiority.

Lets dialogue with charles manson and see if Helter Skelter holds up to peer review.

A true bigot is a true bigot..

Do we dialogue with @l quaid@? No. The government kills and jails them because they couple their ideology with violence.

Whites have a soft spot for historically violent groups like neo nazis and Klan members for obvious reasons and this sadly is when they , lose their minds and expect rarional people to want dialogue with t3rr0rists.

Please only answer the following questions regarding your post and flow of logic in order to prove to me that you're not merging random talking points together to dap fish and to deflect in order to avoid being exposed as not knowing what you talmbowt

how is talking to Charles Manson and coercion related?
how is coercion and truth seeking related?