Rate of women cheating on their husbands increased by 40% since 1990

Beck.er.

All Star
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
1,848
Reputation
710
Daps
6,586
Add in the fact that if you get a divorce the cheating bytch will still take half ur shyt :bryan:

fukk marriage :scust:
Most states have no-fault and fault divorces. Something to keep in mind when getting that marriage license and potential divorce filing.

No-fault divorce started because people (white men) abused the system and sexist society to fck over their kids and June Cleaver-no career-no skills-no options-basic education-no individual/independent future wives. First Wives Club, start a new family and ditch your "old" kids, mid-life crisis and run off to California to "discover" yourself kinda mess.
Plus it made it hard to leave dangerous situations depending on how archaic and limited the fault laws were. (Ex: NYC would only grant women divorces if they could prove infidelity on the part of their husbands. Physical and sexual assault of wives and CHILDREN weren't acceptable grounds).
The progressive, civilized race :hmm:

Depending on what you face losing and your resources get a PI, get proof/hard data/evidence, get an experienced lawyer, file first/blindside her, adultery as grounds for fault so she loses claim to alimony. If have kids go for full custody, beat her to the punch, bring evidence and make accusations regarding parental fitness, appropriate environment, etc.

Be proactive.
Also better to marry a woman that has a career, skills, ambition, ability to survive well independently (also good in general for family financial stability).
And don't have her be some old timey stay-at-home-mom that leaves the work force and falls behind in skills, experience, earning potential, financial independence, and professional competitiveness.
Financial dependence and sacrificing earning potential for family is why alimony got introduced.
 

Beck.er.

All Star
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
1,848
Reputation
710
Daps
6,586
This is my issue, why does the violator get rewarded in a sense? If you bust it up, you get no cut, that should be how it is
The aggrieved party isn't proactive and calculating.

Or the potentially high drama and cost makes no-fault divorce seem the most practical option.
 
Top