I've never thought the MVP should automatically go to the best player of the best team. Too many variables to just simplify it down to which team has more wins...However, for those of you who do feel that way. I hope you don't change your toon should Durant/Embiid/Morant,etc... secures the #1 seed.
It's been interesting how fluid the criteria can be. For example,
2005:
Nash best* player on the best regular season team
62 win suns
15.5/11/3 with a 22 PER
MVP winner
2006:
Billups best player on the best regular season team
64 win Pistons
18.5/8.6/3 with a 23.4 PER
5th place in MVP votes :/
Then, take Tatum's
2023 campaign so far... career year and front runner in that recent ESPN straw poll.. but if Boston ain't gonna be the #1 seed, what's the argument for him when 4 other guys score more (including Embiid and Giannis), and 10 others have higher PERs/statistically better seasons (including Embiid and Giannis)?