The thing is...50% shooting from two cannot be considered as efficient nowadays as it once was. That's because three point attempts and three point percentage have gone up league wide.
Paul George is shooting below league average and below team average from three in terms of percentage. Not every player could create as many decent shots for himself the way PG13 can but it's hard to believe he couldn't pass some of those shots off to a teammate who could get a look where they'd shoot it at least 33+%.
PG13 is 97th in effective field goal percentage at the moment. It's not terrible for an NBA player but it's definitely not impressive for a franchise player.
Except
@stepbackj34spud, like a lot of folks, make the mistake in thinking that 3-PT% has the same efficiency value as FG%, which is why he believes PG is an "inefficient chuck". Now, if someone told him that PG was as efficient on his threes as someone who shot 49% on midrange jumpers, he wouldn't be so quick to tarnish him with the brush of
inefficiency.
Nobody is going to shyt on someone who basically shoots 50% on midrange jumpshots are they?
On the point about his three-point shooting in relation to the rest of the league and his team:
He's shot poorly over the last two games from behind the arc, which have drastically lowered his percentage, and isn't indicative of how he's shot the ball over the other 17 games (35.3%). It also doesn't take into account that he shoots threes at 38% for his career, and has shot at 40% for the last half a decade. Given he doesn't have anyone even remotely as talented to help carry the offensive load, he's forced into taking more [difficult] shots than he'd like to. That's not to say he's put in a position where he needs to take every one of those shots, but he's making the best out of a bad situation with Reggie Jackson as his sidekick.
He's going to have games where he needs to be aggressive, and where he needs to take shots that have a higher probability of going in than his teammates', and the results aren't always going to be in his favor. But he must continue to keep taking them, because of how great of a shooter he is, and how much his team relies on him to initiate and maintain runs for them. If he was a bad, or even average shooter, and he was taken this volume of shots, perhaps there'd be an argument there he shouldn't be taken them, but he's one of the best shooters in the league, and nobody else on the Clippers even remotely compares.
It's even made worse by
@stepbackj34spud trying to make out like PG hasn't been one of the best performers up to this point, and based on that, an All-NBA selection would not go unwarranted.