You’re such a casual you don’t even realize that if a coach has an opinion of a player being “great”, a good coach never openly campaigns for an opposing player when they have an mvp candidate on their own team. It’s terrible for morale.
I can you what has been terrible for morale:
- Wiggins’ bum ass continuing to coast through games; not being a difference-maker on either end of the floor
- Klay hijacking the offense trying to get himself back to his old self
- The over-reliance on only one legitimate big in the rotation
- Wiseman not being any further along to returning and contributing anything of worth because he’s a good-for-nothing talentless hack who they wasted a #2 pick on
- The complete inability to defend without Draymond.
A throwaway comment from Kerr about Jokic that was made in the context of being asked a question about his play doesn’t even register. Steph has had an inconsistent season, and hasn’t performed to the best of his abilities - he’s even admitted that himself. You ask him who he thinks the MVP is up to this point and he’ll mention Jokic as one of the names. You ask any coach in the league directly who they think the MVP is and Jokic will be a name that is constantly brought up. You’re just reaching for shyt because you can’t use anything that has been happening on the floor because you don’t watch Warriors games. You exposed yourself a week ago referencing a tweet that had absolutely nothing to do with that game in question m, not to mention they still maintained a lead when Steph was given a quick breather and then put back in the game.
Kerr has been saying stupid, contradictory things for weeks now and it’s only casuals like you who defend him.
No, you’re the one who’s said stupid and contradictory things about him for
years now. You’re one of the biggest Draymond detractors on this board, even to the point where your dumbass tried to say that Eric Paschall was better and should replace him. While in the next breath saying Kerr ain’t coaching shyt. How is it that Draymond is this bum who ain’t shyt without the system, and would be a bench player on another team, yet Kerr is a fraud? Dray has been the second-most integral piece of the winningest team in the last decade. Now, how could that possibly be if he’s a bum and Kerr is nothing more than a “substitute teacher”?
Once again, your agendas don’t meet up.
Steph had to change his own rotation minutes because Kerr is too stupid to do it himself.
Steph hasn’t changed shyt.
You don’t watch games, so how the fukk would you even know what’s been happening? The entire coaching staff has been experimenting all season trying to find a balance to keep Wiggins engaged, keeping non-Steph lineups to a minimum, developing Poole and the rookies, managing their size disadvantage, all the while doing it with a limited support cast. Steph had his best stretch of the season when the ‘new’ rotational pattern was implemented earlier in the season. His shooting struggles were all his own and had nothing to do with his rotation minutes. Now, it’s all been about trying to find a happy medium to where he can find some consistency.
He’s been hiding behind his “system” for years when real fans of basketball knew his “system” was based on having the 3 best offensive players to ever play the game.
For starters, Kerr and this GS squad had historic success before KD even joined them. shyt, the system was the reason they defeated KD and made him want to join them. It’s completely dishonest to try and attribute what made them successful to KD. What’s even more dishonest is calling Klay one of the “greatest offensive players to ever play the game”; this is the same dude who’s one of the most volatile and inconsistent players in recent memory, and the team was still good enough to push through that to five-straight Finals appearances.
Furthermore, name me a coach that has done anything notable without great players? This is an age-old argument that clown ass nxggas like yourself use to fuel their agendas. Phil and Pop are two of the the greatest coaches, yet what have they done without top-10 players of all time at their disposal? Not a goddamn thing. What has any coach done without historically great players? Not a cotdamn thing. Why single out Kerr as if that means he ain’t shyt? By that logic, that must mean every single coach is in the same boat, does it not? How has Kerr managed to have all this success with top-300 Draymond?
How fitting your confused keyboard militant ass would reference a tweet from some random Asian that doesn’t know what he’s talking about.