In the context of the argument, yes it is.
You're just making a fool of yourself. There isn't one poster on this board besides you who would say, "It's wrong for you to say that Tony Allen got hurt in Game 3, even though he got hurt in Game 3, because he aggravated a lingering injury and also got hurt later too."
And it's even dumber for you to say that it was wrong "in context", because the EXACT damn context was that he was hurt more in Games 4-6 than he was beforehand, which is EXACTLY what you just fukking admitted.
If you really meant he was affected by his hamstring injury (from the regular season) more in Games 4-6, than 1-3 you should've stated that, because that meant you would've agreed with my position. Instead you stated he got hurt in Game 3, which is wrong.
But that is EXACTLY what I said from the very first comment that started this never-ending ridiculousness.
In the 2015 Conference Semifinals, Memphis lost Mike Conley, arguably their most important player against the Warriors, for Game 1. Memphis got blown out, but when Conley came back they won games 2 and 3 even with Conley not at 100%. But then Tony Allen, their best perimeter defender, got hurt during Game 3 and had to either sit out or play limping the rest of the games of the series, and the Warriors won the next three games going away.
Details you got wrong in this part of your post:
Allen didn't get injured in G3 - he was injured in the third quarter of G4
iv) Allen was moving fine in the first half of G4 (no different to the first three games) .
The Grizzlies weren't beating them if Conley was completely healthy (before Allen was injured, their adjustment on defense made him a non-factor)
It is OBVIOUS to anyone reading that quote that whether I said, "Tony Allen got hurt in Game 3" or "Tony Allen re-aggravated an injury during Game 3 and again in Game 4", the message is the same. Tony Allen was affected by his injury more in the last three games of the series than he was during the first three. I've proven that clearly. I've also proven that it was in part due to him hurting it in Game 3, or at least that Tony Allen, his coach, and ESPN felt that way.
Your claim that Tony Allen didn't get hurt in Game 3 was wrong.
Your claim that early Game 4 when the Warriors made the adjustment was "before Allen was injured" was wrong.
Your claim that Allen was moving just as fine in Game 4 as he was earlier was wrong.
And I got receipts from three sources to prove that.
You. Were. Wrong.
Just eat an L once in your damn life instead of always trying to pretend your L's don't exist.
p.s. - here is Tony Allen "moving fine" in the 1st half of Game 4:
Doesn't even lunge at Curry on the drive, just stands there like Tony Allen NEVER does.
Pulls up limping and obviously injured on a fast break.
Pulls up limping and obviously injured on a fast break
again, getting outrun by Draymond.
Steph going off for 21 in the first half
And that all happened "before he was injured" in your argument.
That's just grabbing off the highlight reel. How easy was that shyt?
