Cool Dr. Money
I’m Lil Jimmy but my boys call me J-Murder!
Chuck is right about the clippers Shaq in his feelings
Shaq talking that shyt about Deandre I been saying.. Son doesn't get any post touches at all
Shaq amd Chuck are both dumbazzes. DJ cant make a hook shlt, why would anyone pass him the ball when he's just gonna get fouled and brick fts?Shaq talking that shyt about Deandre I been saying.. Son doesn't get any post touches at all
Yeah pg as the 4 against a small ball team is deadlyThe Pacers, along with PG are quietly putting together a solid season. They can put mid-level East playoff teams like the Bucks, Wizards and the Raptors on notice this year.
They, along with the Pistons are the two teams that I'm watching to possibly upset us this year on the path to LeBron and the Cavs
You're lying to yourself. Rondo was never a great player, let alone a great player for FOUR years.Well, I ain't about to unpack 4 years of basketball and this is the kind of argument that quickly descends into semantics so that's that.
They actually do. If a player is touching the ball EIGHT times more than the second most player in the league, yet they only average 0.12 points per touch (368th in the league) - obviously he isn't doing shyt with the ball but hindering his team's offense by not scoring at an even adequate rate.Honestly I feel like this shyt's a red herring in how it fails to reflect what you see on the court. Dividing points scored by possessions tells you nothing about how those touches impact the game.
Yet all the top offenses' main ballhandlers have a 0.25 points per touch and upwards (Curry is 0.359 PPT on 89.4 touches a game).You're essentially saying that a touch is "to no avail" if it doesn't end in a score for the person holding the ball because that is the only thing that stat infers. It's literally touches/ppg.
Do I really need to spell it out that if your main ballhandler is 5th in the league in time of possession, 1st in touches in the league, 10th in offensive rating on his own squad team - while scoring 12 ppg, and the team currently has the 20th best offense - that it's because the main ball handler's inability to score is hindering the offense?You haven't described or demonstrated any correlation between a player's total touches and a team's offense, in short, comprehend what?
Actually believe what? That they've basically had near-equal impact on their respective team's offense so far? I suggest you watch more games breh.Jack's trending up and as much as Wall has struggled there's no way you've watched them play and can actually believe that, but cool another story.
No it's not. It's based on results. The Kings have a poor offense and Rondo has poor offensive rating for a reason.Then your complaint is aesthetic because "give somebody else the same remit and you get the same thing" certainly isn't qualitative..
Go and look up all the offenses he's led. They've always been middle-of-the-pack to the worst in the league. I don't even know why this needs explaining.I don't buy it because you're pointing to a correlation based on a multitude of factors, then underlining one feature as if it defines everything else. If you're trying to tell me that those stats are representative of the best years of his career then you're trying to sell me a lie.
We've been over all these points before. What is it with you when it comes to Rondo? It's as if you act oblivious to all that's come before, when it concerns him.Never needed you to hold my hand but I can't respond to a point you haven't made without putting words in your mouth. To that end chill with the hyperbole.
Nope. Wrong. I don't think they would've kept the offense going at the same rate for the remainder of the season, but it wouldn't have dropped as it did if they didn't sign Rondo. Defense would've taken a hit, but not their offense.Carlisle is a great coach, Rondo was a bad fit for a flow offense and didn't look healthy but every indicator suggests that Mavs team was due a sharp regression to the mean, their schedule was way backloaded and their lack of depth at the forward position hurt.
Replace CP3 with Rondo and those offenses over past three seasons would've fallen off a cliff.When exactly were the Clippers under Doc Rivers not a top ranked offense?
There's a reason why he let Rondo freelance in Boston, and not demand him to be an option scorer - the offense suffered because of it. There's a reason why Doc realized you're not going to win if you have a ball-dominant PG who doesn't move the ball.The alterations of their play style had more to do with younger personnel, injuries and Blake's evolution as a ball handler as opposed to some revelation Doc had that you've tenuously linked to Rondo.
Guess who's leading the league in assists at the expense of making his team's offense shyttyguess who's leading the nba in assist
it's only $40 @Codeine Crazyi make sure that i clear my schedule every night a golden state warrior game comes on TV
i don't have league pass
( ) man I love this shyt. You know the nba is back when gil is posting long winded essays at 2am in the morning ( )You're lying to yourself. Rondo was never a great player, let alone a great player for FOUR years.
They actually do. If a player is touching the ball EIGHT times more than the second most player in the league, yet they only average 0.12 points per touch (368th in the league) - obviously he isn't doing shyt with the ball but hindering his team's offense by not scoring at an even adequate rate.
Yet all the top offenses' main ballhandlers have a 0.25 points per touch and upwards (Curry is 0.359 PPT on 89.4 touches a game).
Do I really need to spell it out that if your main ballhandler is 5th in the league in time of possession, 1st in touches in the league, 10th in offensive rating on his own squad team - while scoring 12 ppg, and the team currently has the 20th best offense - that it's because the main ball handler's inability to score is hindering the offense?
Have you even watched any Kings games this season? Have you not seen how Rondo's inability to score has affected their offense?
Actually believe what? That they've basically had near-equal impact on their respective team's offense so far? I suggest you watch more games breh.
No it's not. It's based on results. The Kings have a poor offense and Rondo has poor offensive rating for a reason.
Go and look up all the offenses he's led. They've always been middle-of-the-pack to the worst in the league. I don't even know why this needs explaining.
We've been over all these points before. What is it with you when it comes to Rondo? It's as if you act oblivious to all that's come before, when it concerns him.
Nope. Wrong. I don't think they would've kept the offense going at the same rate for the remainder of the season, but it wouldn't have dropped as it did if they didn't sign Rondo. Defense would've taken a hit, but not their offense.
Replace CP3 with Rondo and those offenses over past three seasons would've fallen off a cliff.
There's a reason why he let Rondo freelance in Boston, and not demand him to be an option scorer - the offense suffered because of it. There's a reason why Doc realized you're not going to win if you have a ball-dominant PG who doesn't move the ball.
Doc Rivers Convinced Chris Paul to Become Less Ball-Dominant | SLAMonline
guess who's leading the nba in assist
@GreenstringsElfrid Payton remains a below-average shooter and ranks toward the bottom among shooting guards in gravity and distraction scores — proprietary SportVU tracking stats that measure how closely defenders stick to players (gravity) and how willing defenders are to drift away from those same players (distraction). Payton has the third-worst distraction score among all guards in the NBA, ahead of only Rajon Rondo and Ronnie Price