It's not really shytty logic when both teams played relatively the same, yet the difference was one role player went off now is it?Because his shytty logic shytted on your shytty logic
It's not really shytty logic when both teams played relatively the same, yet the difference was one role player went off now is it?Because his shytty logic shytted on your shytty logic
It's not really shytty logic when both teams played relatively the same, yet the difference was one role player went off now is it?
I never suggested it wasn't (although a role player getting his career-high is considerably less likely to happen - but that's besides the point). My point was that both teams played relatively the same, @Sly Cookin made it seem as though the Hawks as a whole played noticeably better.One player is the difference in a game more often than not. To say that as if it doesn't happen in virtually every game is pretty shytty
I can't see any of the championship teams; Cavs, Spurs, Warriors, Clippers, Rockets taking a chance on him. It would have to be a team that wants to make the playoffs like the Mavs or Pacers.
I never suggested it wasn't (although a role player getting his career-high is considerably less likely to happen - but that's besides the point). My point was that both teams played relatively the same, @Sly Cookin made it seem as though the Hawks as a whole played noticeably better.
didn't peep the game but I saw the highlights
impressive
I believe his point was if the same exact game played out but instead of the Hawks it was another elite team and instead of Bazemore it was some "superstar" player then you probably wouldn't have said that the way you said it.