Trading Dragic before the deadline has zero chance of happening unless they're getting offered a superstar in return.
You're not serious with this are you? Why would any team give up a 'superstar' for a player that's going to be a FA this summer? There's certainly more than a 0% chance he's traded without the incentive of a 'superstar' before the deadline.
At this point they're still more likely to look to move Bledsoe before losing Dragic.
I highly doubt any team will take on his contract, especially since he isn't an elite PG and PGs like Bledsoe are a dime a dozen. Hence why I said Dragic is the odd-man out, because HE'S the one that'll suitors will be going after, NOT Bledsoe.
Your Dallas suggestion again makes no sense. You think Dragic isnt playing to his potential because of the other 2 pgs...and your suggestion is to send him to possibly the only team in the league with more pgs than us?
Harris would be the backup to Dragic, and would hardly impact on his minutes. Barea is a reliever, he's at the end of the rotation and has only been used this season because the Mavs need a scoring punch - they don't get that from Rondo and they didn't get that from Nelson. His minutes would be reduced if Dragic was on board.
Dragic is 1st in minutes, Bledsoe is 2nd in minutes and Thomas is 5th in minutes on the Suns - that's a clear sign that something has to give.
That's not reality, that sounds more like you trying to force your weird Rondo obsession into the conversation.
Dallas was simply an example, for the fact that they had a #1 offense without an elite PG - adding Dragic would have put them over the top. Celtics, Lakers and Knicks are other examples too.
at you talking about forcing a player fixation into the argument. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
