Where the fukk did I say he should get ALL the blame? Show me where? You're creating strawmen at this point.
Which is fair enough. Again. You're making an argument that doesn't go against what I've said.
So a player that scored 28 points, with the majority of them being open shots, was better than the player that ran the offense all night, and who was largely responsible for getting not only his team back in the game and extending the lead, but dragged in defenders so that Morrow could get his shot off (and the rest of the team), as well as scoring 28 points and 8 assists and put the Celtics in foul trouble?
I think you may need to watch the game again. Because it's quite clear that Reggie was the player that had the most impact/production in that game.
Rondo shouldn't get all or even most of the blame for this loss. I assumed you're putting all the blame on Rondo because the game ended hours ago, you've been talking about the game for hours and the only person on the Celtics you keep bringing up is Rondo. No long paragraphs about how Jeff Green & Avery Bradley were a combined 11-33 with a large number of their shots being open, no paragraphs about how Olynyk, Sullinger & Zeller gave up 50 points in the paint (Unless you're really gonna blame Rondo for not protecting the paint), no paragraphs about how Evan Turner was a complete liability on both ends. It's all been about Rondo and only Rondo. So yes I made an assumption.
I said that Reggie was the one that brought them back into the game in the 3rd, got them the lead and played a significant part in the win. I'm not sure what more you want. Morrow was the one who closed the game out down the stretch, he was the one that came up big, 20 points in the 4th quarter. I'm not going to go back and forth about this, they both played significant parts. If you say Reggie was the best player on the court, I don't have any problem with that.