Adam3000
-
Possible, but I felt and looked in the mirror like I was going full parallel and I never felt my back round until that 1 rep at 185 (which is why I stopped). So I think I was doing them correctly.Zerchers kill my legs and glutes.I bet if you recorded your form it'd resemble a zercher good morning more so than a zercher squat
I certainly felt them in my legs. When I said "subpar" I was speaking in relative terms. Its not really controversial to say that lifting less weight = subpar. Unless your Zercher is higher than your back squat either in reps or poundages, it is unquestionably inferior for leg development. Just simple biology.
My glutes already get fukked up doing ATG back squats, so maybe thats why I didn't notice a particular emphasis on them doing the Zerchers. Maybe I'm too conditioned to it.
Matter of fact, I need a damn hack squat machine because I think my quads are being under-utilized compared to my posterior chain. Or I can just suck it up and leg press.
I will say though, in terms of functional strength I think that even after only 1 session I would put Zercher's at #3 in terms of importance. Only behind Farmer's Walks and Overhead Press. Yes, I think I would even put them above deadlifts. Having recently moved and thus carried a fukk ton of boxes and furniture, the Zercher was a perfect translation to that type of movement.