Rachel Dolezal Pt II or Bull: "BLM Organizer Shaun King Mislead Oprah By Pretending to be Biracial?"

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,826
Reputation
2,195
Daps
56,258
Who do you think it is supporting the BLM movement?
George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action

Its the same people. People who are fighting for civil rights period. People who have moved beyond the in-fighting those in power want us to do.

LGBT Community Marches for "Black Lives Matter"
What part of "these people have a history of hijacking black movements and using blacks for their own agendas" didn't you get? Ooh a 100 lbgt people got out and marched one day for BLM, they're really down for our struggle. You're a $2 ho. You can't even publicly disagree with homosexuality now because the lbgt community has the power to systematically punish and censure anybody does. Yet you're impressed because 100 people associated with their movement got out and symbolically marched? You didn't even acknowledge the fact of the lbgt community being just as racist as mainstream society.

You said you watched the conversation they had with Hilary. Did they ask her anything about gay lives?
No.
Their main agenda is Black lives, you don't see them interrupting political rallies to talk about gay rights. They may support the gay movement as they should, but they clearly have their own agenda.
Conflating gay issues with black issues isn't the only criticism that I have of BLM. I've already explained why I felt the video with Clinton was problematic and you even agrees with my criticisms. The video showed that they don't have an agenda. Clinton asked them straight out "what do you want me to do" and they literally said "you need to tell us what to do". What the fukk are you arguing here? They came flat out and told you that they are waiting on white folk to tell them what to do. Their main agenda isn't "black lives" it's white acceptance.


This is clown shyt. EVERY civil rights movement we have had, has been supported by people outside our community or it wouldn't have happened.
And that's the problem you stupid son of a bytch. That's why we haven't gone anywhere because we constantly allow other groups to infiltrate under the guise of being allies, and they end up hijacking our shyt and using us for their own benefit. The civil rights movement didn't work bruh. It's one thing to be a ignorant motherfukker, but it's another thing to be an ignorant fukk who isn't willing to listen and learn.



The same white people supporting LGBT huh?:ohhh:

But I thought you just said they didn't also support our movement?

Which is it?
The point is that BLM isn't our movement. If you've got white people funding and ultimately controlling the movement then how the fukk is it ours? We didn't have any say over these BLM being our representatives or spokespeople. They don't speak for me.

This nikka married to a white woman?

Wow:wow: its always the ones overcompensating for something.

Like the gay dudes that are extreme homophobes.

Wait @Gravity is a homophobe too :ohhh:

"We all alone, don't nobody care about us":birdman:

"Hey bekka can you make me a mayo sandwich":ld:



:dead:
More passive aggressive fakkitry.
:heh: You sit here gossiping about someone that you don't know like some limp wristed queen while trying to run reverse psychology game on me. You can't make this up. I live in the real world not online.

To that other geek stalking me with quotes/mentions/reps and all that, you don't get any attention. That's your punishment. When you apologize for being disrespectful then I'll acknowledge you.
 

thekidvoodoo

8-bit
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
742
Reputation
100
Daps
1,802
George Soros!?! Oh shyt!!!! Not the...





JEWS!!!

First they got Meek Mill in a battle he clearly won with the chart topping "I wanna know" now they pretending to have been some of the longest standing allies in the black civil rights movement in America!?!

:demonic: They must be stopped!

:heh:
:camby:
 

Red Shield

Global Domination
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
21,316
Reputation
2,447
Daps
47,392
Reppin
.0001%
All this Rachel Shaun madness leads me to believe most African Americans dont even know what a Black person is..
if you can get fooled by Shaun then clearly your idea of what constitutes as Black African descent is completely off..

Lotta folk don't wanna agree with @marcuz but dude is right. :skip:
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
68,830
Reputation
3,669
Daps
108,213
Reppin
Tha Land
But I thought you said nobody wanted to help us.
On one hand you say no other group is willing to help, then on the other hand you say too many jews and gays are helping.


Which is it?

What part of "these people have a history of hijacking black movements and using blacks for their own agendas" didn't you get? Ooh a 100 lbgt people got out and marched one day for BLM, they're really down for our struggle. You're a $2 ho. You can't even publicly disagree with homosexuality now because the lbgt community has the power to systematically punish and censure anybody does. Yet you're impressed because 100 people associated with their movement got out and symbolically marched? You didn't even acknowledge the fact of the lbgt community being just as racist as mainstream society.
And a lot of black people are just as homophobic, yet some people on both sides find ways to come together, while idiots such as yourself argue over nonsense.

Conflating gay issues with black issues isn't the only criticism that I have of BLM.
Which rally did they break up to talk about homo issues?
What is their official policy request on gay issues?

Where is this conflation you speak of?
I've already explained why I felt the video with Clinton was problematic and you even agrees with my criticisms. The video showed that they don't have an agenda. Clinton asked them straight out "what do you want me to do" and they literally said "you need to tell us what to do". What the fukk are you arguing here? They came flat out and told you that they are waiting on white folk to tell them what to do. Their main agenda isn't "black lives" it's white acceptance.
Campaign Zero

Yes, looks like white acceptance to me:ehh:

Looks like you were longing from some "white acceptance" from your wife too :heh:

And that's the problem you stupid son of a bytch. That's why we haven't gone anywhere because we constantly allow other groups to infiltrate under the guise of being allies, and they end up hijacking our shyt and using us for their own benefit.
Says the guy married to a white woman:francis:
The civil rights movement didn't work bruh. It's one thing to be a ignorant motherfukker, but it's another thing to be an ignorant fukk who isn't willing to listen and learn.
Without the civil right movement you'd be in jail for laying with your wife.

But yeah that shyt didn't work :camby:

The point is that BLM isn't our movement. If you've got white people funding and ultimately controlling the movement then how the fukk is it ours? We didn't have any say over these BLM being our representatives or spokespeople. They don't speak for me.
Well make it your movement. What are you doing other than sitting on the Internet talking dumb shyt?
They aren't excluding you, to tell them what you want, use your voice, fix it.


More passive aggressive fakkitry.
:heh: You sit here gossiping about someone that you don't know like some limp wristed queen while trying to run reverse psychology game on me. You can't make this up. I live in the real world not online.

To that other geek stalking me with quotes/mentions/reps and all that, you don't get any attention. That's your punishment. When you apologize for being disrespectful then I'll acknowledge you.
What's your wife's opinion on the subject?:ohhh:


:mjlol:
 

thaKEAF

#grizzlies #titans
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,767
Reputation
8,755
Daps
110,089
Reppin
Memphis
Been following him on Twitter since Ferguson and always assumed he was biracial. Despite the smear campaign I still think he is unless he says he is not. Rachel you could look at her and tell she was white easily, but his facial structure does not look like that of a cac to me :manny:

Never knew about the scam accusations though, if true that's fukked up.
 
Joined
May 30, 2014
Messages
27,277
Reputation
9,735
Daps
103,631
Reppin
Midwest/East Coast/Tx (Now in Canada)
George Soros!?! Oh shyt!!!! Not the...





JEWS!!!

First they got Meek Mill in a battle he clearly won with the chart topping "I wanna know" now they pretending to have been some of the longest standing allies in the black civil rights movement in America!?!

:demonic: They must be stopped!

:heh:
:camby:



Jewish Involvement In
Black Slave Trade
To The Americas


By Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael
2-24-6
The following passages are from Dr. Raphael's book Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History (New York: Behrman House, Inc., Pub, 1983), pp. 14, 23-25.
"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular trade' that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760's, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."
Dr. Raphael discusses the central role of the Jews in the New World commerce and the African slave trade (pp. 23-25):
SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES JEWISH INTER-ISLAND TRADE: CURACAO, 1656
During the sixteenth century, exiled from their Spanish homeland and hard-pressed to escape the clutches of the Inquisition, Spanish and Portuguese Jews fled to the Netherlands; the Dutch enthusiastically welcomed these talented, skilled husinessmen.
While thriving in Amsterdam - where they became the hub of a unique urban Jewish universe and attained status that anticipated Jewish emancipation in the West by over a century - they began in the 1500's and 1600's to establish themselves in the Dutch and English colonies in the New World. These included Curacao, Surinam, Recife, and New Amsterdam (Dutch) as well as Barbados, Jamaica, Newport, and Savannah (English).
In these European outposts the Jews, with their years of mercantile experience and networks of friends and family providing market reports of great use, played a significant role in the merchant capitalism, commercial revolution, and territorial expansion that developed the New World and established the colonial economies. The Jewish-Caribbean nexus provided Jews with the opportunity to claim a disproportionate influence in seventeenth and eighteenth century New World commerce, and enabled West Indian Jewry-far outnumbering its coreligionists further north-to enjoy a centrality which North American Jewry would not achieve for a long time to come.
Groups of Jews began to arrive in Surinam in the middle of the seven-teenth century, after the Portuguese regained control of northern Brazil. By 1694, twenty-seven years after the British had surrendered Surinam to the Dutch, there were about 100 Jewish families and fifty single Jews there, or about 570 persons. They possessed more than forty estates and 9,000 slaves, contributed 25,905 pounds of sugar as a gift for the building of a hospital, and carried on an active trade with Newport and other colonial ports. By 1730, Jews owned 115 plantations and were a large part of a sugar export business which sent out 21,680,000 pounds of sugar to European and New World markets in 1730 alone.
Slave trading was a major feature of Jewish economic life in Surinam which as a major stopping-off point in the triangular trade. Both North American and Caribbean Jews played a key role in this commerce: records of a slave sale in 1707 reveal that the ten largest Jewish purchasers (10,400 guilders) spent more than 25 percent of the total funds (38,605 guilders) exchanged.
Jewish economic life in the Dutch West Indies, as in the North American colonies, consisted primarily of mercantile communities, with large inequities in the distribution of wealth. Most Jews were shopkeepers, middlemen, or petty merchants who received encouragement and support from Dutch authorities. In Curacao, for example, Jewish communal life began after the Portuguese victory in 1654.
In 1656, the community founded a congregation, and in the early 1670's brought its first rabbi to the island. Curacao, with its large natural harbor, was the steppng-stone to the other Caribbean islands and thus ideally suited geographically for commerce.
The Jews were the recipients of favorable charters containing generous economic privileges granted by the Dutch West Indies Company in Amsterdam. The economic life of the Jewish community of Curacao revolved around ownership of sugar plantations and marketing of sugar, the importing of manufactured goods, and a heavy involvement in the slave trade, within a decade of their arrival, Jews owned 80 percent of the Curacao plantations. The strength of the Jewish trade lay in connections in Western Europe as well as ownership of the ships used in commerce. While Jews carried on an active trade with French and English colonies in the Caribbean, their principal market was the Spanish Main (today Venezuela and Colombia).
Extant tax lists give us a glimpse of their dominance. Of the eighteen wealthiest Jews in the 1702 and 1707 tax lists, nine either owned a ship or had at least a share in a vessel. By 1721 a letter to the Amsterdam Jewish community claimed that "nearly all the navigation...was in the hands of the Jews."' Yet another indication of the economic success of Curacao's Jews is the fact that in 1707 the island's 377 residents were assessed by the Governor and his Council a total of 4,002 pesos; 104 Jews, or 27.6 percent of the taxpayers, contributed 1,380 pesos, or 34.5 percent of the entire amount assessed.
In the British West Indies, two 1680 tax lists survive, both from Barbados; they, too, provide useful information about Jewish economic life. In Bridgetown itself, out of a total of 404 households, 54 households or 300 persons were Jewish, 240 of them living in "ye Towne of S. Michael ye Bridge Town." Contrary to most impressions, "many, indeed, most of them, were very poor." There were only a few planters, and most Jews were not naturalized or endenizened (and thus could not import goods or pursue debtors in court). But for merchants holding letters of endenization, opportunities were not lacking. Barbados sugar-and its by-products rum and molasses-were in great demand, and in addition to playing a role in its export, Jewish merchants were active in the import trade.
Forty-five Jewish households were taxed in Barbados in 1680, and more than half of them contributed only 11.7 percent of the total sum raised. While the richest five gave almost half the Jewish total, they were but 11.1 percent of the taxable population. The tax list of 1679-80 shows a similar picture; of fifty-one householders, nineteen (37.2 percent) gave less than one-tenth of the total, while the four richest merchants gave almost one-third of the total.
An interesting record of interisland trade involving a Jewish merchant and the islands of Barbados and Curacao comes from correspondence of 1656. It reminds us that sometimes the commercial trips were not well planned and that Jewish captains - who frequently acted as commercial agents as well - would decide where to sell their cargo, at what price, and what goods to bring back on the return trip.
(End of excerpt)
Tony Martin is African studies professor at Wellesley College and has taught at Wellesley College, Massachusetts since 1973. He was tenured in 1975 and has been a full professor of African Studies since 1979. Prior to coming to Wellesley he taught at the University of Michigan-Flint, the Cipriani Labour College (Trinidad) and St. Mary's College (Trinidad). He has been a visiting professor at the University of Minnesota, Brandeis University, Brown University and The Colorado College. He also spent a year as an honorary research fellow at the University of the West Indies, Trinidad.
Professor Martin has authored or compiled or edited eleven books, including Literary Garveyism: Garvey, Black Arts and the Harlem Renaissance, and the classic study of the Garvey Movement, Race First: the Ideological and Organizational Struggles of Marcus Garvey and the Universal Negro Improvement Association.. His most recent book is The Jewish Onslaught: Despatches from the Wellesley Battlefront. Martin qualified as a barrister-at-law at the Honourable Society of Gray's Inn (London) in 1965, did a B. Sc. honours degree in economics at the University of Hull (England) and the M.A. and Ph.D. in history at Michigan State University.
Martin's articles and reviews have appeared in the Journal of Negro History, American Historical Review, African Studies Review, Washington Post Book World, Journal of Caribbean History, Journal of American History, Black Books Bulletin, Science and Society, Jamaica Journal and many other places. His work is to be found in several anthologies and encyclopedias. He has received a number of academic and community awards.
Martin is well known as a lecturer in many countries. He has spoken to university and general audiences all over the United States, Canada, the Caribbean and England, and also in Africa, Australia, Bermuda and South America. In 1990 he delivered the annual DuBois/Padmore/Nkrumah lectures in Ghana.
Professor Martin is currently working on biographies of three Caribbean women - Amy Ashwood Garvey, Audrey Jeffers and Trinidad's Kathleen Davis ("Auntie Kay"). He is also nearing completion of a study of European Jewish immigration into Trinidad in the 1930s.
The Jewish Onslaught
Despatches From The Wellesley Battlefront
By Tony Martin
"...a polemic of the highest order... the best example of an African answering critics since David Walker's Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World." - Molefi Asante, Journal Of Black Studies
"Professor Martin at long last deals with the Henry Gates/Cornel West attacks on Afrocentricity.... Martin provides a solid analysis of the historical use of Blacks by whites to discredit original Black thought deemed unacceptable by non-Blacks....
"I compare The Jewish Onslaught to the classic third chapter of DuBois' The Souls of Black Folk entitled 'Of Mr. Booker T. Washington and Others....' Martin has written a book that years from now will be considered a classic.... It is simply a must reading on a controversial subject that needs greater airing than some of the more timid political attempts of recent years." - Raymond Winbush, The Voice Of Black Studies
" Tony Martin has been forced to delve into the relationship between the Jews and Blacks and in the process, he has distilled a work that is informative, fascinating and one which will heighten the consciousness of Black people everywhere." - Carl Wint, The Sunday Gleaner
#1 Bestseller
(Your Black Books Guide)
Best Book Of The Year
(Black Literary Awards, 1994)
1993. vii+137pp. ISBN 0-912469-30-7.
Subject: Who owned the slaving ships?
Name Of Slave Ships And Their Owners:
The 'Abigail-Caracoa' - Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy, Jacob Crown
Isaac Levy and Nathan Simpson
The'Nassau' - Moses Levy
The 'Four Sisters' - Moses Levy
The 'Anne' & The 'Eliza' - Justus Bosch and John Abrams
The 'Prudent Betty' - Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix
The 'Hester' - Mordecai and David Gomez
The 'Elizabeth' - Mordecai and David Gomez
The 'Antigua' - Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell
The 'Betsy' - Wm. De Woolf
The 'Polly' - James De Woolf
The 'White Horse' - Jan de Sweevts
The 'Expedition' - John and Jacob Roosevelt
The 'Charlotte' - Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks
The 'Franks' - Moses and Sam Levy
A video, "The Jewish Role in the Black Slave Trade," a speech by Prof. Tony Martin with an introduction by Hoffman, remains online at Google, as of this writing. Viewers who wish to see it before it, too is censored by Google, can access it here:
 
Joined
May 30, 2014
Messages
27,277
Reputation
9,735
Daps
103,631
Reppin
Midwest/East Coast/Tx (Now in Canada)
@thekidvoodoo Here, read this as well

'Selma' Got It Right by Leaving Out Jews - Opinion



Leida Snow’s review of the new film “Selma” takes director Ava DuVernay to task for a “glaring omission” — airbrushing out the contributions of white people in general, and Jews in particular, to the civil rights movement. But Snow makes this critique by drawing selectively from American Jewish history, and her triumphalist narrative is more deserving of her critique than the movie is.

Snow offers a well-tread recitation of a triumphalist version of black-Jewish relations presented in synagogues and summer camps, complete with mention of Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner, Jewish involvement in the March on Washington, and Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel marching with Dr. Martin Luther King at Selma. This version animates social action in a multitude of Jewish spaces, including youth groups, Hillel-sponsored alternative spring breaks and missions to post-Katrina New Orleans. But it’s dangerous for several reasons.

First, it’s a version of history that ignores how the civil rights movement was — rightly — a black-led movement in which only a small proportion of Jews played significant roles. When Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner were murdered alongside James Chaney in June 1964, the death of white Jews drew Jewish attention to a movement that had long since been underway. And it’s worth pausing to ask, as a community: Had Chaney been murdered without Goodman and Schwerner, would that moment have attracted the attention that it did in the Jewish community? And if not, why?

Second, it’s a version of the Jewish past that continually emphasizes the liberal proclivities of Jews even as they moved up the socio-economic ladder. The identification of Jews with liberalism can be a source of pride, or a reason to lament. But either way, this hasty association erases the enormous amount of contestation that happened within Jewish institutions and communities over Jewish politics.

By labeling all American Jews as liberals, we sand down the rough edges of communal debates and impose a consensus on the past on issues and in places where no such consensus ever existed. In presenting the all-Jews-were-civil-rights-activists narrative, Snow’s “glaring omission” is the excising of Jewish actors who don’t fit neatly into this triumphalist narrative.

We don’t hear about Jewish involvement in racist real-estate practices through redlining and blockbusting. Or about Southern Jewish congregations who censored their rabbis for marching with African-Americans and pleaded with national organizations to leave issues of integration and civil rights to local communities. Or about Jews who, segregationist or integrationist, simply did nothing.

Perhaps more insidiously, Snow’s version of Jewish liberal triumphalism papers over the extent to which liberal Jewish organizations took conservative stances during the early Cold War. Motivated by fear, many Jewish organizations severed ties with civil rights and labor groups to mitigate against links between Jews and Communism.


Rather than dwell on how much screen time Jews lacked in “Selma,” we should pay more attention to liberal Jews versus leftist Jews, and the variety of political positions Jews took across the left political spectrum. As historian Michael Staub has argued, “Without paying close attention to intra-Jewish conflict, we have no idea how contentious these individuals’ positions within the community often were, nor of how energetically and creatively anti-left and antiliberal arguments were put forward by their critics.”

In fact, there’s a burgeoning literature on Jewish conservatism that aims to correct the automatic equation of Jews with liberalism, allowing for a truer retelling of the Jewish past and a better understanding of the Jewish present.

So instead of congratulating ourselves for the actions of a few 50 years ago, we might begin to think about how Jews can amplify black voices in the #blacklivesmatter movement and work for the rights of people of color in this country today.

It’s a shame Leida Snow missed a “great teaching moment” by selectively lionizing a handful of Jews while simultaneously airbrushing out the rest.



Read more: 'Selma' Got It Right by Leaving Out Jews - Opinion


3 BODIES DON'T MEAN shyt.
 

ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA

Return of the Khryst
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
77,245
Reputation
9,159
Daps
118,592
Reppin
ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA
shaun-king-screencap-640x480.jpg

a few shades darker he reminds me of..
warren G.
 

Thuglet

Banned
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
1,333
Reputation
-490
Daps
4,061
Reppin
A on everything thats whaddup
All this Rachel Shaun madness leads me to believe most African Americans dont even know what a Black person is..
if you can get fooled by Shaun then clearly your idea of what constitutes as Black African descent is completely off..

gallery-1433858850-jidenna-classic-man.jpg
150303090900-restricted-01-aylmer-twins-large-169.jpg

Thats cuz stuff like this can happen if you have even a little tiny bit cac in you that stems from one or both of your parents
 
Top