Well if that's the case then call them out on the merits of their movement instead if jumping down this "is he black or not" rabbit hole.
Yes. The point should be whether or not King is a fraud regarding the donations and other actions he has taken in the role of identifying as a police brutality/black rights activist. That should be separated from his racial identity and paternity issues.
Same with BLM; whether it can become a movement with a mission and goals and realistic plans to achieve them (even if its decentralized and locally focused) or if it's just hot air, attention whoring, self serving, overly idealistic and isolated.
I'm not a follower of S King or BLM. We have to stay focused on what is best for the greater good and not get caught up in the media clusterfukk.
The media and mainstream love to anoint a Leader of All the Negroes then proceed to tear them down. We've never had one sole grand leader, never been a monolith, never been simple sheep, never been able for the media to distill our concerns, experiences, protests, movements into a simple bullet point or two.
And these people with opinions on Twitter and at rallies are hardly the equivalent of MLK, X, Washington, DuBois, Carmichael, Newton, Seale, Lewis, Hamer, Davis, Chisholm, Rustin, Randolph, Powell, Wells, etc, etc anyway.