Race relations, slavery and discrimination in Saharan and Sahelian West-Africa

Sonni

Pro
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
441
Reputation
290
Daps
939
Reppin
NULL
In the light of current fight against arab-berber slavery in Mauritania I decided to make a thread about this subject of which many young black North-Americans have only vaguely heard of. My parents hail from this region and I am a member of IRA which is a mauritanian movement wich peacefully fights against slavery and discrimination by the racist mauritanian government. First of all I am mainly talking and informed about the situation in Mali and Mauritania but its a phenomenon that is also visible in countries like Niger, southern Algeria, southern Morocco, ...


Mauritania: White Moor(beidane) 30%, Black Moor(Haratine)40%, Black-Africans(Fulani, Soninke and Wolof)30%


I apologise for my bad english.



edit: I wanted to make a thread about Mali and Mauritania but I see there’s already one about the Mali Tuareg situation, so this will be solely about Mauritania
 

Sonni

Pro
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
441
Reputation
290
Daps
939
Reppin
NULL
Race in Muslim West Africa

Local concepts of race and racial differences in the West African Sahel and savanna zone nations of Senegal, Mauritania, Niger, and Gambia require academic inquiry. In light of the recent Tuareg rebellion in northern Mali that has since been seized by Ansar Dine, the Islamic fundamentalists who have imposed a harsh form of sharia law in the region of northern Mali the Tuareg call Azawad. Executions, destruction of historical sites, and other immoral actions have taken place that necessitate international attention, but the rambles of the Malian government only recently requested permission of the UN for intervention from foreign troops, something that should have happened several months ago. Indeed, ECOWAS should have intervened months ago to help prevent some of the recent excesses of Islamic fundamentalists' rule of Mali. Furthermore, Malian civilians themselves have stepped up their desire for militias to liberate the northern half of their nation. Unlike the MNLA, Ansar Dine are not seeking independence for a Tuareg homeland, but rather sharia law encapsulated within a theocratic Malian state, which will likely never happen. Nevertheless, the political crisis that has engulfed Mali for the last several months has yet to receive the critical attention it needs. Indeed, it is only mentioned in passing by the American media to highlight the links to Al Qaeda that Ansar Dine possesses, no calls for critical analyzes of the historical development of the crisis. In my humble opinion, the political crisis in Mali and, specifically, Tuareg nationalism, which has manifested itself in rebellions in the past, is directly linked to local concepts of race, 'racism' and religion.



Although somatic differences between populations do exist and are sometimes obvious to the observant eye, particularly skin color, local concepts of 'race' in the precolonial southern Sahara, Sahel, and West Africa were often linked to culture. First, Berber-speaking peoples, whose descendants are currently the Tuareg and Mauritanians, were hardly a homogenous group. Though often assumed to be 'white,' many Berber-speaking groups were and are thought of as 'black.' Indeed, some Arabic writings refer to certain historical Berber groups in the Sahara as "Sudan," or black. One Arabic writer from medieval Fatimid Egypt, for example, a dynasty which relied on military slaves, included the Masmuda among the black slaves purchased to keep the Shia dynasty in power from 969-1171. Other Berbers, includings the Zenaga (the root of the Senegal) were linked with or associated with the "Bilad al-Sudan," an Arabic geographic term associated with black or dark-skinned people in Africa. However, definitions of blackness varied across the medieval Muslim world. For instance, one Afro-Iraqi philosopher and scientist, Al-Jahiz, wrote a book on the superiority of the blacks over the whites which included Copts, Berbers, and other populations as "black" that are not often thought of as such. Clearly, many "Copts" and Berbers are indeed black, and both Egyptians and Berbers were thought of as descendants of Ham alongside other African populations, such as the Zanj, Habashi (Ethiopians and people from the Horn of Africa), Nuba (Nubians), and others, such as the many ethnic groups and kingdoms writers using Arabic from North Africa and the Mediterranean used to describe the Mandinka, Songhai, Wolof, Fulani, Kanuri, and Hausa peoples (along with many others) of West Africa who actively participated in the trans-Saharan trade.



Another assumption often made by those ignorant of West African history is to believe that all states that developed in ancient West Africa were the result of trade accelerated by the Islamic world's demands for gold. Though it is true that the gold used for dinars of various Islamic states in North Africa and the "Middle East" were necessary for those economies, states and long-distance trade within western Africa have existed for millenia before the rise of Islam. Ghana, or Wagadu, an ancient Soninke state, had likely existed for at least 600 years before the rise of the prophet Muhammad. These Soninke peoples had controlled a large state encompassing parts of southern Mauritania, Mali, and Senegal, and was ranked by many writers from North Africa as the most powerful of the kingdoms of the Western Sudan. In addition, Kawkaw, Takrur, and other polities, including city-states such as Jenne-Jeno, were part of this political context. These states developed largely before the rise of Islam and the presence of Arab traders. In fact, archaeological work in Mauritania and Mali (as well as across West Africa) have shown stone settlements and fortifications, long-distance trade items, developments of more centralized and hierarchical communities, and high population densities in the historic core of the Western Sudan (particularly the Mema region of Mali). Many archaeologists and historians now believe that the Soninke-dominated Wagadu polity emerged out of the Tichitt-Walata civilization that dates back to 2000 BCE, and provides the earliest evidence of walled settlements and towns in western Africa. These communities were agro-pastoral, and likely interacted with Berbers and other Saharan populations, especially since rock art from the area depicts horsemen and cavalry. These Soninke and other ancient "black" West Africans have also intermarried and interacted with Berbers for millenia, and an ancient hybrid "Berber-Soninke" language developed that is still spoken in Mauritania, an "Arab" nation.



Perhaps this ancient interaction between Berbers and Soninke is what a historian of the Western Sudan from Timbuktu alluded to when he claimed that the kings of Wagadu had 'white' blood in their veins. Such a claim linked 17th century Timbuktu society's definitions of race, and thus must be considered in that light. "White" by this time was linked to lineages claiming Arab descent and honor to be closer to Muhammad as well as a term, "bidan," that implied non-slavery. These "bidan" were likely Saharan populations speaking a Berber tongue, and based on the presence of tifinagh, or ancient Tuareg and Berber scripts in the rock art, could have been linked to the Garamantes of the Central Sahara in ancient Roman times. These Garamantes were hardly "white" in the contemporary sense. If one looks at contemporary Berbers, Mauritanians, and other Saharan populations, diversity was always present, but one's subsistence patterns and culture played a larger role in determining race. Based on the semi-nomadic Fulani of West Africa, many "bidan" or whites were referred to by other West Africans as "red," and yes, some were quite light-skinned. However, based on Arabic writings mentioned above, and including some pertaining to Berber dynasties which took power in Iberia (Almoravid and Almohads), many of these "bidan" Massufa, Zenaga, and Sanhaja were considered "black" or perceived as dark-skinned. In this case, one Almoravid leader of the 11th century was described as brown and wooly-haired. However, as pastoralists many were distinct from sedentary farming communities of "black" West Africans and considered different, despite frequent intermarriage mutual dependencies. Regardless of projected labels to describe different groups, some physical differences did and do exist, particularly obvious in some Mauritanians and some Tuareg compared to Wolof, Mandinka, Dogon, Hausa, and other West Africans. However, one must point out the phenotypical diversity within Mauritanian "Arabs" and other Saharan populations goes back several thousands of years. Based on discoveries of ancient human remains, rock art (hardly an ideal source, but it does display phenotypical variation across the Holocene Sahara), and the writings of the Greco-Roman period, "blacks" or "Ethiopians" were well-known and inhabited the Sahara and North Africa.


Many of these ancient Berbers that crossed the Sahara or lived within it's vast borders would have included many autochthonous "blacks" who were already Berbers or part of its spread to West Africa. Furthermore, many ancient Saharan and Sahelian populations contain phenotypical variation due to the dry, arid climate which tends to lead to longer limbs and longer, narrower noses that may explain some of the different phenotypes among Fulani and Tuareg peoples. Regardless of the impact of the environment on human phenotypes within the region, a large degree of heterogeneity likely persisted for milennia, something noted by archaeologists uncovering the remains of two chronologically distinguished populations in Gobero, Niger, which I write about here. They claimed that the first population consisted of tall men and women with "Mediterranean" features, but many of those so-called "Mediterranean" features can be found within West or East Africa. In fact, ancient human remains uncovered in Kenya dating to a similar Late Paleolithic period were labelled "Mediterranean" for being tall peoples lacking stereotypical "Negroid traits. Moreover, the Mediterranean is a sea surrounded by lands inhabited by diverse peoples, including "blacks" from ancient Egypt and other regions of North Africa. Equally problematic is labels such as "sub-Saharan," since "sub-Saharan" Africa includes a region with incredible range in physical characteristics, encompassing 92% of world variation. And Saharan and Sahel populations clearly straddle both North and "sub-Saharan" Africans, although one does not need to be from south of the Sahara to be "black" or "African" since an entire continent is a large landmass with massive heterogeneity.

An Arab identity only developed in the Sahara during the 17th century when Hassaniya Arab migrants conquered local Berbers and the latter gradually adopted an Arab identity. These people, referred to as "Moors" by European contemporaries, were also described by white European writers as predators on sedentary black agriculturalists and perceived as only fit for slave labor. This color-coded scheme for labor and local concepts of race was also present among other neighboring West African societies considered "black" by outsiders, such as the Fulani of Niger and the Songhai of Mali and Niger. This concept of "bidan" or whiteness was always linked to a broader context of Islam, Arabs, and the Arabic language, however. And many self-proclaimed "bidan" or peoples labelled as such would be considered "black" in another context, like the Maghreb or Europe. This seems to be the case for many of the Almoravid leaders and soldiers during their 11th century conquest of the Maghreb and Iberia. Furthermore, when 14th century Moroccan Arab traveler Ibn Battuta visited the Mali empire and Sahel, he did not attribute any racial identity such as bidan to the Sahelian Berbers, mostly Massufa and others in desert-edge cities such as Walata. He on only one occassion references any whiteness, and presumably does not refer to their "whiteness' because culturally they're so far from the standard Arabo-Islamic way of life to the north. Among these southern Saharan and Sahelian Berbers, women often did not wear the veil, matrilineal practices deviated from the patrilineal Arabs, and the perceived freedom of Massufa women shocked Ibn Battuta. Thus, regardless of their skin color, these Berber-speaking groups could not be 'white' since they were not following established Arab Muslim cultural pratices. In addition, during Ibn Battuta's stay in 14th century Mali, he noticed no sign of 'racial' animus or conflict between groups such as the Massufa and the "black" Mandingo rulers of Mali whose representatives carried out order and justice in Sahelian cities such as Walata.


In addition to fictitious lineages and patrilineal Arab Muslim culture, "bidan" was also built on distinguishing slaves from non-slaves. To be a slave implied someone not being a Muslim, and since most slaves in West African societies were black and non-Muslim, many found further reason to distance themselves from 'blackness.' Thus, black Fulbe and Soninke people of non-slave or lower-castes often identitified themselve sin contrast to 'blacks,' though all groups were considered black by Europeans and "Arab" North Africans. For Arabo-Berbers, their lineages also put them in position where blacks were in "tutelage" for the Islamic knowlege and culture they possess, meaning that they were also incapable of being slaves because they were "white," Muslim, and Muslims could not be enslaved, thereby making them white and Islam "white." Of course, one must keep in mind that these lineages did not often correlate with one's phenotype, so many of these "whites" were dark-skinned people. If blackness came to define servile status, then why would anyone want to identify with it?

Clearly, these precolonial and colonial period definitions of race have cast long shadows. The contemporary crisis in Mali or ongoing slavery in Mauritania are directly linked to these notions of black as servile and equated with slavery. Relations between Senegal and Mauritania have also been strained by these issues of race and racial identity. Meanwhile, "Moors" from Mauritania have immigrated to Senegal and other West African nations while Tuareg have spread further into some places such as northern Nigeria while those in Mali and Niger continue to live on the margins of these modern West African states. Tuareg communities faced further marginalization from Mali when Modibo Keita and successive rulers defined Mali in terms exclusive of Tuareg or "non-blacks" while also focusing on the southern half of the nation where the majority of the population lived.

The World is Robert: Race in Muslim West Africa
I dont agree 100% with what is said in this text but its imho close to reality.
 

Sonni

Pro
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
441
Reputation
290
Daps
939
Reppin
NULL
Anti slavery march, Mauritania June26 2012





Anti slavery protest by young Haratine(black Moors), just two days ago
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Captain Crunch

Veteran
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
44,485
Reputation
2,469
Daps
112,748
Reppin
NY
So the slavery in those countries is sexual as well as labor slavery?
Also, what type of progress has been made?
 

theworldismine13

God Emperor of SOHH
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
22,711
Reputation
555
Daps
22,613
Reppin
Arrakis

Sonni

Pro
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
441
Reputation
290
Daps
939
Reppin
NULL
So the slavery in those countries is sexual as well as labor slavery?
Also, what type of progress has been made?
If you own a person you can do whatever you want with him or her so of course there are cases of sexual slavery. It is mostly labor slavery though as in herding goats or camels for no pay. Or cleaning, washing clothes, taking care of children, driver. This type of thing and for almost no pay.

Yes, progress has been made. Slavery is definitely dying in Mauritania. Whereas before independence in 1960, people would openly admit they have slaves as it was a normal thing. After independence in the ’60s and 70’s people would be ashamed of it and hide it. The majority of Haratines are not slaves at all anymore but they are discriminated against because their forefathers used to be slaves. The stigma is still there. This with some cases of slavery exposed by Human rights Activists and the attitude of the White Moor dominated governments denying it or under pressure of powerful tribes simply freeing the perpetrators causes anger.

Also the black africans have had their own slaves. But they have never been treated as badly as the Arab-Berbers did. Also all have been freed even though their descendants are definitely still discriminated against. In the black african community it is an issue of discrimination and stigma against slave-descendants.
 

Sonni

Pro
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
441
Reputation
290
Daps
939
Reppin
NULL
What are the protesters shouting in the sceond video, it sounds like "o re yay" and was the first march succesful in getting the people out? And are you saying there is also a slavery problem in Mali?
They are screaming ''Hourriya'' which means ''Liberty'' in the local arabic. People get incarcerated and liberated all the time.

There are also Moors in Mali and they have the same society as Mauritanian Moors. So yes there too you have slavery. Also Tuaregs have the same type of slavery. Their (former) slaves are called Bellahs.
 

Sonni

Pro
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
441
Reputation
290
Daps
939
Reppin
NULL
There are two major problems for blacks in Mauritania.
You have the situation of the Haratine slave-descendants and the discrimination of the free black-africans. In 1989 approx a 100.000 black-africans got kicked out after an excuse of them being senegalese or them planning a coup if they were soldiers or policemen etc ...
Now most people have come back but they live like refugees in their own ancestral land. The beydane are masters in division and deception. They gave away a lot of the land belonging to the black-africans who are farmers to the haratines. So the haratines felt obliged to the Moors. There frequently is tension between the black haratine and the black africans who are strugling to eat and you have White Moors whom are governors, judges, etc almost always judging in favor of the haratine to make sure they stay loyal. You can see what I am talking about in this vid.

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c4jGpWIPyU[/ame]
 

B-Rock Odrama

Banned
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
1,456
Reputation
-800
Daps
1,216
Reppin
NULL

While i'm sure the people deemed slaves in that documentary are an historical slave caste and are marginalized cause of it I still find it odd that there wasn't shown one scenerio of traditional slavery taking place and at most there were only claims and suggestions that poor tribal people in similar clothing and premitive shelter were slaves and masters cause the former were darker than the other even though both were same complextion:what: and the alleged slave camp in which even the narrator admitted the allged slaves were free but still slaves:usure:

I think more than slavery Mauritania's problem is a racist caste system simlar to the one implemented in Indian soicety....I suspect it's due to the legacy of arab and French imperalism in the country which favored lighter skinned and arab or European origin Mauritanians..Blacks are obvously the clear majority of the country so it's partially there fault for letting themselves being dominated by a minority of arabs in the 1st place...This is a tastament to the fact Islam is is an anti black/racist arabcentric cult which conditons black Muslims to be submissive toward arabs..Non Muslims Africans would never let ragheads rule them like that for so long.
 

B-Rock Odrama

Banned
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
1,456
Reputation
-800
Daps
1,216
Reppin
NULL
, ...


Mauritania: White Moor(beidane) 30%, Black Moor(Haratine)40%, Black-Africans(Fulani, Soninke and Wolof)30%


I apologise for my bad english.



edit: I wanted to make a thread about Mali and Mauritania but I see there’s already one about the Mali Tuareg situation, so this will be solely about Mauritania

out of curiosity..What does the average "white Moor" look like? It seems to me "white Moors" are the Moors whom ancestors mixed with arabs and Romans and ligher skinned arabasized Berbers.. I've seen distinction made between Haratines and black Moors before but it seems like you are saying they are one and the same..

A former aquitance on another forum of mine once claimed to me that Mauritanians/Moors and Tuaregs are the same people and that the Moors are arabaized Tuareg....Do you think there is validity to that theory?
 

B-Rock Odrama

Banned
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
1,456
Reputation
-800
Daps
1,216
Reppin
NULL
An article on Mauritanian blacks house negro status in relatation to "white Moors"

Mauritania - They Live In Slavery</B>


AUTHOR: Garba Diallo,1996
Translated by Courtesy of the author


This text from 1996 is still actual. Even though Colonel Maaouya Ould Taya was toppled on August, 2005 after of 21 years of dictatorship, slavery remains a reality in Mauritania, officially the last country in the world to abolish it in 1980. The new elected president Sidi Ould Sheik Abdallahi promised during his election campaign to start a policy of "positive discrimination" towards the victims of slavery. But this old practice, although camouflaged, is not close to disappear. (Tlaxcala)

Don&#8217;t worry; I am not planning to kidnap you 200 years back in history. What I want to tell you about is now, 1995. It is the story about a black Mauritanian slave whose name is Abdi.

Abdi is not an ordinary name which free people choose for their children. Abdi means slave in Arabic and the name is typically reserved for black slaves. Even though slavery was officially abolished in 1980, for the third time in independent Mauritania, slavery and slave trade are still a living reality.
Because of the massive sexual exploitation of female slaves by white male masters, the slave population has increased to become the largest single ethnic group in the country.
Mauritania&#8217;s population consists of about two million inhabitants: 32 per cent free black Africans of Fulani, Soninke and Wolof ethnic origins, 28 per cent white Moors of Arab-Berber origin, and 40 percent black slaves known as Abid or Haratin. The slaves belong to the white Moors, who have monopolized the government in the country since the French colonial regime transferred political power to them in 1960. The white Moors have no intention or interest in abolishing slavery, because this may incite the slaves into challenging Moorish supremacy.

New dimension of slavery
In cultural clashes between the Moorish regime and free black Africans, slaves have been used by the regime as buffer and death squads against the Africans. Slaves like Abdi still identify with, and blindly obey their masters. Thus, slavery has assumed a new and deadly, dimension. The current military regime of colonel Taya is aware of this and is exploiting slave power to settle old scores with the free blacks who resist and challenge Moorish hegemony.
Since the Afro-Arab conflict exploded into violent clashes in 1989, slaves have been organized into militia groups, which the government uses to massacre and deport blacks to Senegal and Mali. Like in the apartheid days of South Africa, they are being manipulated into black-on-black mutual destruction.

Slave economy


I met Abdi in his master&#8217;s shop near Cheikh Anta Diop University in Dakar on August 3, 1994. Dakar is not just the capital of Senegal, but also one of the busiest urban centers in West Africa. Here, one can meet West African students, academics, elites and officials, who are there to study or to take part in endless regional forums. Dakar is also the meeting point for micro and macro business men and women coming to make or lose money. More colour is added to the urban chaos by all the foreign tourists who come by the thousands in their red, bare legs every year.
Established in 1958, the university is one of the oldest and most prestigious education centres in West Africa. Obviously Abdi did not end up here to learn in order to join the few elite of the region. He was brought here from Mauritania by his master, who was seeking profit. The master can work him to death with impunity and then send for another slave.
Shockingly, no one seems to notice that a black slave is still being kept in bondage, right in the heart of Dakar by his Moorish enslaver. The modern chaos brings certain freedoms to the rapidly growing informal business underworld.
Like in many other parts of the continent, the colonially created state of Mauritania is withering away. The role of the state has been reduced by the IMF and World Bank conditions that ensure the dictator&#8217;s protection from being lynched by the hungry and angry urban masses.
The Moorish master is not worried at all that this capital crime might be discovered, or that people passing by his shop might hang him in the tree growing just outside. Decidedly, the university students who are regular customers of the slave shop must have learned that slavery was abolished in the former French colonies already in 1905.
Prior to the 1980 abolition, slavery had been declared illegal in 1960 and 1966, but only on paper. The slave holders have become so accustomed to exploiting blacks as slaves for the last thousand years, that they cannot give up living on the backs of their slaves just like that. Both slaves and enslavers have internalized the slave-master status quo in such a way, that it would take more than just official decrees to eradicate slavery in the country.

Slave soldiers
The latest abolition was motivated by different factors. After a decade of catastrophic drought, most of the nomadic masters became so poor that they were no longer able even to feed themselves, not to mention to keep and feed a large number of slaves. Thousands of slaves were therefore released into the already overcrowded urban centres, where their masters hoped they would be able to collect a living for the masters&#8217; households. Masters are not supposed to do manual labour. While some slaves were recruited as menial soldiers to fight in the West Sahara War from 1976 to 1979, others hung around and hustled, stealing or selling basics like water. When Mauritania withdrew from the Sahara War, the slave soldiers were demobilized and sent to the streets.

Aborted liberation struggle
Enlightened slaves organized themselves and established an emancipation movement called &#8220;El Hor&#8221; meaning freedom. El Hor&#8217;s aim was the total abolition of slavery and effective and concrete measures to help the slaves become economically independent.
This was the only way to cultivate self respect and psycho-social emancipation. Although the methods El Hor chose were peaceful and mild, this nevertheless created panic within the white Moorish community and its military regime. The organization was challenging both the traditional social order and the military dictatorship.
Their liberation campaign was about to paralyse the slave market and make it impossible for the masters to sell human beings on the open market. Outside Mauritania, El Hor managed to draw the attention of international media and human rights groups to the persistence of slavery in the country. The result was embarrassing pressures on the regime from abroad.
To prevent a full scale slave revolution leading to real emancipation and the demise of minority rule, the regime of colonel Ould Haidalla decreed on July 5, 1980 abolition and the imposition of the Islamic Sharia Law. Sharia gives masters the right to compensation for setting their slaves free. Thus, the abolition decree stipulated that slavery was abolished throughout Mauritania, and that a national commission composed of Muslim legal experts, economists and administrators would be established to assess how much the masters would be compensated for each slave lost by the abolition.
Nothing was done to free the slaves in any meaningful sense of the word. But the regime managed to achieve its objectives, which were to deflect both external and internal pressures, while satisfying the masters at the same time. The masters are the same white Moors who control the state machinery for their own exclusive benefit. In this way, real emancipation was aborted.

Camel torture
For Abdi it was safer to remain with his master, who is morally responsible for his household and animals. Abdi is not responsible, nor is he a human being with feelings or the right to make a family. He is a machine that works like hell without pay or rest. Like the machine, Abdi needs only to be fed to oil his black muscles from cracking. His master can take him anywhere and make him carry out any task. He can be legally sold, given away, used to pay a bride price, or castrated to avoid mating with the master&#8217;s harem.
The master&#8217;s right comes before that of God, and he has the right to sleep with any of Abdi&#8217;s female relatives, as they are by law his concubines. Abdi is not even allowed to go to the mosque if his master needs him. If he tries to escape, the master applies the dreaded camel torture on him. Abdi is mounted on a thirsty camel with his legs tied under the belly. Then the ship of the desert is allowed to drink. As the huge belly expands, Abdi&#8217;s legs crack and he will never be able to run away again.
If Abdi uses his head &#8220;too much&#8221;, the master sends insects down his ears. A large belt around his head blocks his ears, while both his hands are tied behind his back. As the insects struggle to get out, Abdi is driven to insanity. The vast majority of the slaves are so brain-washed, that they would consider it a sin to escape from their masters. Their ancestors were kidnapped into slavery long ago, and their offspring have been brought up to believe that Allah created two groups of people: slaves and masters, each playing specific and eternal roles in society.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slave and master go to Dakar



Abdi, another slave and their master had come to Dakar some years ago. Perhaps the master intended to use his slaves as starting capital for his business. Small businesses thrive and bring quick profit, especially for a foreigner with free slave labourers who can melt in as Senegalese in Dakar.
There are no state controlled opening hours, so the two slaves work almost 24 hours a day, and eat and sleep inside the shop in shift. I coincidentally stopped by the shop to buy a drink. Abdi was busy selling basic items to customers from the university. There was another man helping Abdi. I recognized them as Mauritanian slaves, because they were black and spoke the Arabic dialect of the white Moor community of Mauritania.


This made me curious to want to talk with the two men about their business in Dakar. Without telling them that I was actually a black Mauritanian like them, we conversed across the counter of the shop. But they were hesitant to my inquiries concerning their life in Dakar and the situation in Mauritania. After a while though, they said that they were running the shop &#8220;together&#8221; with their master.
I wondered where the master was.
Abdi smiled and pointed behind the counter. There he was, a little shabby looking white Moor, sleeping while his two black slaves toiled for him. Before he woke up, I was able to steal a couple of shots of him and his two slaves.

The silent North
The UN and diplomatic missions are well aware of the situation in Mauritania. So, what are the reasons behind the international community&#8217;s silence toward slavery in Mauritania?
It is definitely not because of any economic or strategic considerations, that the rest of the world does not help to eradicate this evil practice.In my opinion, the most relevant factors are:


- There is little inter-African communication on cultural or political issues. Otherwise, Africans would have realized that the slaveholders consider all blacks to be either tamed or potential slaves.
- This problem is a part of the Afro-Arab cultural conflict, which ranges from the Sudan by the Red Sea to Mauritania on the Atlantic Coast. This conflict has a clear racial element which has been going on for more than a thousand years. Both African and Arab leaders prefer not to talk about this dirty and deadly north-south conflict within the south, because this would suggest a lack of solidarity within the Third World. The traditional &#8220;imperialist North versus exploited poor South&#8221; attitude in international relations could not be sustained.
- The legacy of trans-Atlantic slavery has left a collective and eternal guilt in the European mind, which makes it difficult for European nations to take a moral stand on condemning Arab slavery in Mauritania.
- Most European writers who have been to Mauritania belong to the romantics who worship the magic of the desert and its rough and violent social order. This love for the desert and the feudal system helps to preserve the evil system in its racist form.

The Danish connection
One of the leading supporters and lovers of the Mauritanian desert society was Henrik Olesen of Denmark. Olesen was the local UN boss, who preferred to be called &#8216;Le Patron&#8217;. He closed his eyes, ears and conscience to the most brutal violation of human rights until one afternoon in June 1989, when Mauritanian security police stormed the UN offices to arrest, undress, torture and deport his black Mauritanian finance director, Mr. Abdoul Diallo, and his personal secretary, Miss Roukhaya Ba, to Senegal.
When Henrik Olesen protested in a letter to the government, he was told to withdraw the letter and shut up &#8211; or get the hell out of the country. He left without delay. Was there any reaction from the UN or Denmark? Nothing, but silence.
Another Dane who has been deeply involved with the Mauritanian regime is Poul Sihm of the World Bank.When Norway threatened to cut development aid to Mauritania in 1991, because of the racist violation of human rights, Mr. Sihm sent a fax to the Norwegian Ministry for Foreign Affairs with the following plea for the slaveholders: &#8220;To stop this development [aid] would, in the eyes of someone who has been intimately involved in the [Arab owned] livestock sector of Mauritania since 1983 and as such has visited the country at least two times a year, and be a great mistake.&#8221; (Fax number 2791/1, October 24, 1991, by Mr. Poul Sihm).

Liberation struggle

What all this means is, that Abdi and his 800,000 fellow slaves should not expect much solidarity and support from the Danes, nor other world leaders. As another slave called Bilal told Le Monde in 1990, the slaves have to carry out their own liberation struggle to the inevitable victory of justice over injustice. Time, history, demography and justice are on the side of the victims of this brutal practice. In the meantime, Abdi will work with no pay and without complaining, while his master sleeps deeply into the middle Ages.
 

Sonni

Pro
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
441
Reputation
290
Daps
939
Reppin
NULL
While i'm sure the people deemed slaves in that documentary are an historical slave caste and are marginalized cause of it I still find it odd that there wasn't shown one scenerio of traditional slavery taking place and at most there were only claims and suggestions that poor tribal people in similar clothing and premitive shelter were slaves and masters cause the former were darker than the other even though both were same complextion:what: and the alleged slave camp in which even the narrator admitted the allged slaves were free but still slaves:usure:

I think more than slavery Mauritania's problem is a racist caste system simlar to the one implemented in Indian soicety....I suspect it's due to the legacy of arab and French imperalism in the country which favored lighter skinned and arab or European origin Mauritanians..Blacks are obvously the clear majority of the country so it's partially there fault for letting themselves being dominated by a minority of arabs in the 1st place...This is a tastament to the fact Islam is is an anti black/racist arabcentric cult which conditons black Muslims to be submissive toward arabs..Non Muslims Africans would never let ragheads rule them like that for so long.
yes, there is a gray area between freedom and slavery and thats is where most Haratines are in. The fight is against slavery and the discrimination of slave-descendants. Traditional slavery is working for no pay. A master can let you do what you do for 5 years and then suddenly if your father dies he can come and take all your meager belongings by justifying you are his slave and you have never been freed. This is frequent in Mauritania. If you want clear cases of slavery I can give that to you. But it will be in french.

Also you are right blacks are a clear majority but very divided and many still choose to serve the white dominated government racist objectives.
 
Top