If that logic was true then debates literally wouldn't exist you fukking idiot
It’s just obvious that you put more stock in media awards and regular season counting stats when judging players.
If that’s how you decide whose a better player then go for it.
How Jimmy has consistently performed in the playoffs, against the best teams, matters more to me than Harden dropping multiple 50 pieces against Detroit and Houston.
This isn’t even recency bias. For the past two playoffs runs, a healthy Jimmy Butler has looked like a better, more impactful player than Tatum.
IQ, reading the game, and decision making have to matter when discussing basketball players.
Tatum is more talented, his ceiling is much higher when factoring his age, and I think he has a more varied bag than Tatum but I don’t think he’s better than Jimmy.