Essential Quick Lil Gems on Dealing with Women

[biggiefan4lyfe]

women got me down right now

 

[sixsixtwo]

 

[MaccabeanRebel]

Cism

 

[sixsixtwo]

 

[gameover82]

it funny how in society they telling women that they deserve the perfect man...but for guys it the "half a loaf is better then no loaf" theory... like it doesn't matter how she is as a person just as long she gives good head and keeps you fed and if the relationship goes sour or she cheats on him..it his fault being with her

 

[sixsixtwo]

 

[Im clue]

Exactly. Relationships really shouldn't be complicated at all. The fact that we have nearly 300 pages of material on how to 'deal' with women attests to the problem at hand. As men, we've been trying to compensate and out-strategize the utter insanity that has taken hold of male-female relationships. It really should just come down to two people who are utterly respectful of each other coming together to build something and rewarding each other's loyalty with loyalty in return.

In reality though, it's as if we're attempting to capture and domesticate some sort of wild animal. Hard to catch, and you may get a little bit of decent behavior when caught, but one slip up and you're hyena food. I really don't want to have to do all kinds of smooth routines and be this super mysterious warrior/ceo in order to get some decent behavior out of a woman... and the problem is that once you 'got her', it feels like you're always having to watch your back, lest you say the wrong thing and 'she loses her respect for you' and peels off in the dust. I don't want to have to 'check her' when she brings up these wack tests, nor do I want to have to instruct and discipline her in order for her to bring basic respectful behavior to a relationship like not having 1 million 'brothers', 'cousins', and friends. These women be having more brothers than the million man march.

Man I just don't to deal with it all, so I just focus on finding contentment in other areas of life.

I like that.

 

[winb83]

Exactly. Relationships really shouldn't be complicated at all. The fact that we have nearly 300 pages of material on how to 'deal' with women attests to the problem at hand. As men, we've been trying to compensate and out-strategize the utter insanity that has taken hold of male-female relationships. It really should just come down to two people who are utterly respectful of each other coming together to build something and rewarding each other's loyalty with loyalty in return.

In reality though, it's as if we're attempting to capture and domesticate some sort of wild animal. Hard to catch, and you may get a little bit of decent behavior when caught, but one slip up and you're hyena food. I really don't want to have to do all kinds of smooth routines and be this super mysterious warrior/ceo in order to get some decent behavior out of a woman... and the problem is that once you 'got her', it feels like you're always having to watch your back, lest you say the wrong thing and 'she loses her respect for you' and peels off in the dust. I don't want to have to 'check her' when she brings up these wack tests, nor do I want to have to instruct and discipline her in order for her to bring basic respectful behavior to a relationship like not having 1 million 'brothers', 'cousins', and friends. These women be having more brothers than the million man march.

Man I just don't to deal with it all, so I just focus on finding contentment in other areas of life.

Women have a mostly united front. They have rules of engagement they follow that guarantees they retain social power and control in that arena.

[ame=http://youtu.be/CemLiSI5ox8]Governing Dynamics: Ignore the Blond - A Beautiful Mind (3/11) Movie CLIP (2001) HD - YouTube[/ame]
Most men see things like Nash's friend that thought Nash was bullshytting them all to win out.

 

[Mr. Pink]

Women have a mostly united front. They have rules of engagement they follow that guarantees they retain social power and control in that arena.

Bingo.

I'm assuming we've all been at one point or another at a club/party and seen a drunk chick getting dragged by some guy to the nearest bathroom or to his car. Maybe we've actually been that guy. However at the last second her girlfriends interfere and pull her away. "We don't know you!" they croak. "We're not going to let our friend go with some stranger! She can't take care of herself." That's all bullshyt. They're not actually concerned about her. Not in the "safety" sense of the world. In fact, chances are they'll gladly switch places with her and suck that guy off in the bathroom.

Their real concern is that the girl is giving it away for free. Most women have only their pussies to barter with. That's what they're banking on to get them free meals, clothes, diamonds, a husband, a house, economic stability. They control the supply of sex. But each time a slut is giving it away for free, the collective market value of p*ssy decreases. Each time a slut gives it away for free she indirectly affects every other woman's "buying power".

That's the real reason most women pretend to despise sexually promiscuous women, even though secretly(or so they think) they're gladly switch places with them. That's also the reason most women try to avoid the "slut" label like the plague, and constantly come up with ways and scenarios to rationalize their whorish behaviours. With them it's synonymous with being guilty of treason.

 

[MikelArteta]

Bingo.

I'm assuming we've all been at one point or another at a club/party and seen a drunk chick getting dragged by some guy to the nearest bathroom or to his car. Maybe we've actually been that guy. However at the last second her girlfriends interfere and pull her away. "We don't know you!" they croak. "We're not going to let our friend go with some stranger! She can't take care of herself." That's all bullshyt. They're not actually concerned about her. Not in the "safety" sense of the world. In fact, chances are they'll gladly switch places with her and suck that guy off in the bathroom.

Their real concern is that the girl is giving it away for free. Most women have only their pussies to barter with. That's what they're banking on to get them free meals, clothes, diamonds, a husband, a house, economic stability. They control the supply of sex. But each time a slut is giving it away for free, the collective market value of p*ssy decreases. Each time a slut gives it away for free she indirectly affects every other woman's "buying power".

That's the real reason most women pretend to despise sexually promiscuous women, even though secretly(or so they think) they're gladly switch places with them. That's also the reason most women try to avoid the "slut" label like the plague, and constantly come up with ways and scenarios to rationalize their whorish behaviours. With them it's synonymous with being guilty of treason.

yup why they hate prostitutes and shame and hate on sluts it cheapens the value, if its being given away for free everywhere why get married why commit?

 

[Ohene]

Bingo.

I'm assuming we've all been at one point or another at a club/party and seen a drunk chick getting dragged by some guy to the nearest bathroom or to his car. Maybe we've actually been that guy. However at the last second her girlfriends interfere and pull her away. "We don't know you!" they croak. "We're not going to let our friend go with some stranger! She can't take care of herself." That's all bullshyt. They're not actually concerned about her. Not in the "safety" sense of the world. In fact, chances are they'll gladly switch places with her and suck that guy off in the bathroom.

Their real concern is that the girl is giving it away for free. Most women have only their pussies to barter with. That's what they're banking on to get them free meals, clothes, diamonds, a husband, a house, economic stability. They control the supply of sex. But each time a slut is giving it away for free, the collective market value of p*ssy decreases. Each time a slut gives it away for free she indirectly affects every other woman's "buying power".

That's the real reason most women pretend to despise sexually promiscuous women, even though secretly(or so they think) they're gladly switch places with them. That's also the reason most women try to avoid the "slut" label like the plague, and constantly come up with ways and scenarios to rationalize their whorish behaviours. With them it's synonymous with being guilty of treason.

brilliance

Nothing like an economics or finance analogy to sell me...im such a nerd

 

[sixsixtwo]

Damn, this is one hell of a situation:

Finding out years later that I am the father of twin boys. How do I best approach this family situation?[32m] : relationships

 

[Malta]

Bingo.

I'm assuming we've all been at one point or another at a club/party and seen a drunk chick getting dragged by some guy to the nearest bathroom or to his car. Maybe we've actually been that guy. However at the last second her girlfriends interfere and pull her away. "We don't know you!" they croak. "We're not going to let our friend go with some stranger! She can't take care of herself." That's all bullshyt. They're not actually concerned about her. Not in the "safety" sense of the world. In fact, chances are they'll gladly switch places with her and suck that guy off in the bathroom.

Their real concern is that the girl is giving it away for free. Most women have only their pussies to barter with. That's what they're banking on to get them free meals, clothes, diamonds, a husband, a house, economic stability. They control the supply of sex. But each time a slut is giving it away for free, the collective market value of p*ssy decreases. Each time a slut gives it away for free she indirectly affects every other woman's "buying power".

That's the real reason most women pretend to despise sexually promiscuous women, even though secretly(or so they think) they're gladly switch places with them. That's also the reason most women try to avoid the "slut" label like the plague, and constantly come up with ways and scenarios to rationalize their whorish behaviours. With them it's synonymous with being guilty of treason.

Mr. Pink broke down the market and economics involved in the vagina exchange.

 

[Captain Crunch]

quick rules of thumb that are remarkably useful:

1. never treat a woman seriously if she's a big fan of marilyn monroe

2. never treat a woman seriously if she's a big fan of sylvia plath

What did Sylvia Plath do? Did she basically act like Plath?

 

[Liquid]

Bingo.

I'm assuming we've all been at one point or another at a club/party and seen a drunk chick getting dragged by some guy to the nearest bathroom or to his car. Maybe we've actually been that guy. However at the last second her girlfriends interfere and pull her away. "We don't know you!" they croak. "We're not going to let our friend go with some stranger! She can't take care of herself." That's all bullshyt. They're not actually concerned about her. Not in the "safety" sense of the world. In fact, chances are they'll gladly switch places with her and suck that guy off in the bathroom.

Their real concern is that the girl is giving it away for free. Most women have only their pussies to barter with. That's what they're banking on to get them free meals, clothes, diamonds, a husband, a house, economic stability. They control the supply of sex. But each time a slut is giving it away for free, the collective market value of p*ssy decreases. Each time a slut gives it away for free she indirectly affects every other woman's "buying power".

That's the real reason most women pretend to despise sexually promiscuous women, even though secretly(or so they think) they're gladly switch places with them. That's also the reason most women try to avoid the "slut" label like the plague, and constantly come up with ways and scenarios to rationalize their whorish behaviours. With them it's synonymous with being guilty of treason.

You bring up good points, but I think you might have gone a bit too far saying that they are not concerned about their friend at all. That's a bit extreme.