QUEEN ELIZABETH 1926 - 2022 - Prince Charles becomes King of the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 👑

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,029
Reputation
15,922
Daps
266,220
Reppin
Oakland
i'mma let black and irish twitter have their moment, but let's not act like when the irish in the NE got their white pass they weren't notoriously racist and violent toward us, white irish cops stayed fukkin black people up and i'm sure those "gritty" boston irish crehs still :mjpls: us right now as both sides "celebrate"
 
Last edited:

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
29,228
Reputation
4,894
Daps
46,444
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
I can't believe they're about to make a man the next Queen. This woke nonsense has gone too far!
Moth-To-Flame.png
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2017
Messages
33,851
Reputation
7,968
Daps
183,393
These black British women on CNN have terrible wigs. I noticed when I was in England that the weaves and wigs were terrible. American black women do a much better job with the hair.
 

WhenWeWereKings

All Star
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
1,230
Reputation
326
Daps
4,715
Reppin
NULL
I agree, although I'm not sure how this relates to queen Elizabeth
You mentioned that colonized countries gained independence under her reign as if she deserves some sort of praise for that.

Her family colonized these nations and became extremelly wealthy from the resources of these nations. She and her kids continued to benefit from the financial pillaging of these colonized nations. Did she offer any sort of reparations? Nope. She was queen while these colonies operated under racist and sometimes violent British appointed leaders.

Even after these colonies gained "independence" How many of these "independent" colonies still recognized her as the overall head of state.....

How many of these colonies still suffered from the effects of colonialism?

Yes this clip is very relevant to her.
 

Low End Derrick

Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
16,493
Reputation
5,586
Daps
72,180
You mentioned that colonized countries gained independence under her reign as if she deserves some sort of praise for that.

I mention it because it would be disingenuous to blame her specifically for the subjugation to the people of the former Empire because..

Her family colonized these nations and became extremelly wealthy from the resources of these nations. She and her kids continued to benefit from the financial pillaging of these colonized nations. Did she offer any sort of reparations? Nope. She was queen while these colonies operated under racist and sometimes violent British appointed leaders.

Even after these colonies gained "independence" How many of these "independent" colonies still recognized her as the overall head of state.....

How many of these colonies still suffered from the effects of colonialism?

Yes this clip is very relevant to her.

...she (The Crown) welds no power.

If reparations were to be handed out, that would be a decision made by the UK government.
 

WhenWeWereKings

All Star
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
1,230
Reputation
326
Daps
4,715
Reppin
NULL
I mention it because it would be disingenuous to blame her specifically for the subjugation to the people of the former Empire because..



...she (The Crown) welds no power.

If reparations were to be handed out, that would be a decision made by the UK government.
Well I didn't directly blame her. I posted a video and explained why its relevant to her. You can try and muddy the water all you want. The video is relevant to her.
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
29,228
Reputation
4,894
Daps
46,444
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
...she (The Crown) welds no power.

meanwhile people are being forced to bend the knee (CACWA no criticism rules) and the country is about to shut down?

does ronaldo (CR7) have power? david beckham? lebron james? oprah? kanye? kim k? bishop demond tutu? the pope?

yes they have the power people give them.

ditto the royal family.

harry himself is showing stateside the doors that that name opens and he is not even a woorking royal at present.

"pedo" andrew should be in a US prison (by all accounts). if they had no power andrew would at least be in court. like ghislaine and epstein.

harry + meghan just went to germany and got A class state visit treatment.

let's put it this way, if you became king of the UK tomorrow would you i. gain power? ii. be able to influence change on a national and global level?

fame is power. money is power. position is power. belief is ppower. convention is power. the royals therefore have power.
 

Low End Derrick

Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
16,493
Reputation
5,586
Daps
72,180
Well I didn't directly blame her. I posted a video and explained why its relevant to her. You can try and muddy the water all you want. The video is relevant to her.

Aight breh, if you say so

meanwhile people are being forced to bend the knee (CACWA no criticism rules) and the country is about to shut down?

does ronaldo (CR7) have power? david beckham? lebron james? oprah? kanye? kim k? bishop demond tutu? the pope?

yes they have the power people give them.

ditto the royal family.

harry himself is showing stateside the doors that that name opens and he is not even a woorking royal at present.

"pedo" andrew should be in a US prison (by all accounts). if they had no power andrew would at least be in court. like ghislaine and epstein.

harry + meghan just went to germany and got A class state visit treatment.

let's put it this way, if you became king of the UK tomorrow would you i. gain power? ii. be able to influence change on a national and global level?

fame is power. money is power. position is power. belief is ppower. convention is power. the royals therefore have power.

The crown holds no political power.

all that other stuff you mentioned is celebrity/tabloid culture
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,555
Daps
90,284
Reppin
NO
more babble

the royal family have broken that "no politics" convention before and have remained in power.
so again your conditional stipulation that "she must resign first" is of your own making and is your own delusion.
here are examples of the Queen, prince William and the new King Charles breaking that "no politics" protocol


"It is vital to the health both of the United Kingdom and of Wales that our democratic institutions flourish and adapt," the monarch said during a visit to the Welsh Assembly, according to The Times.
"I share your concerns that we must encourage all our people to exercise their right to vote. This is a real challenge now before us all."

Queen 2003 discussing voting

"Prince William Broke With Royal Tradition to Ask Sheep Farmers About Brexit"

prince charles sent a series of letters to influence politicians over years.
these were later leaked to the press







"The "black spider" memos are letters and memorandums written by Charles, Prince of Wales, to British government ministers and politicians over the years. As the modern British monarch remains politically neutral by tradition, the letters are controversial because of the Prince of Wales's position at the time, the eldest child of the British monarch Queen Elizabeth II and heir apparent to the British throne."

TL;DR. you are spouting more babble. rid yourself of your misconceptions and you will do better.
your stipulation that "the queen must resign in order to comment" is delusional BS.


and additionally meghan was a family matter. not pure politics.
the above examples of the queen, william and the now king breaking convention are 100% political in nature

Charlie and his mother been controlling the PM’s for decades.
 
Top