"Yall" President done spoke and showed respek "Yall" gotta follow suit and show the same respek
I hope Charles has his COVID booster.
All up in people’s faces with no masks
He just put his hand on his mouth!!im watching bbc
dude is shaking everyones hand. Even saw a bunch of black folks out there grinning like a cheshire cat.
dude prob gonna sanitize and burn his suit after this
Lebanon Announces 3 Days Of Mourning To Honor Queen Elizabeth II
As you have most definitely heard by now, Queen Elizabeth II's 70-year reign ended last night when she died at 96.amp.beirut.com
three days of mourning? Lebanon was not even a British colony. country is being governed by the law of the jungle right now but Mikati has time to so shyt like this
im watching bbc
dude is shaking everyones hand. Even saw a bunch of black folks out there grinning like a cheshire cat.
dude prob gonna sanitize and burn his suit after this
she could act though.
how about comments/behaviour on race?
harry spoke out about racism against meghan. the queen said nothing about the same issues.
the queen ran a racist employment policy until .. well we don't know it it even has stopped yet
"The Queen’s courtiers banned “coloured immigrants or foreigners” from serving in clerical roles in the royal household until at least the late 1960s, according to newly discovered documents that will reignite the debate over the British royal family and race.
the queen sat at the head of a family and societal totem pole that lived by notions of a hierarchy in genetic inheritance. in particular that meant marrying blue (white) blood and said nothing.
if anything in word and deed the queen's household supported notions of class hierarchy, superior breeding and accents and immutable indelible genetic attributes.
the queen was married to a man who said several questionable things about race over decades and never once corrected matters in public.
What does this mean she can act? Act on what?
She was essentially a living mannequin that was the symbol of British power.
.
i'll start with the first one.
like harry acted.
like in the example i gave of harry acting.
by using harry as an example I was indicating what I meant.
yeah she could have acted .. like harry
"acted" like harry "acted".
And like the examples you provided before, this is a bad example.
Harry is not the monarch. Harry was never going to be the monarch.
Harry was not restricted in the way that his grandmother was.
Next example.
NBC is on one today
C00n shyt! South Africa with that well deserved ETHER
nope. babble notwithstanding we are still on point 1.
the royal convention that underpins your argument was and is NOT limited to the monarch.
so rid yourself of that false miconception and you will see that what applies to her in this case applies to harry too.
additionally it is only a convention and the case was only obliquely political (as meghan/harry is a family matter) so the convention could be easily bent or broken, just as harry did.
so yeah she could have done what harry did.
but then again CACWAs don't need to be founded in logic