That is a powerful set up and is the way most systems are being set up these days. Though I'm not sure what it has to do with the efficient use of the silicon in the system. I think it has more to do with efficient use of dev time.
PS4 vs. Xbox 1 innovation
- Thread starter Rico
- Start date
That is a powerful set up and is the way most systems are being set up these days. Though I'm not sure what it has to do with the efficient use of the silicon in the system. I think it has more to do with efficient use of dev time.
If you have to ask that, you're either trolling or haven't been paying attention to all the interviews that Mark Cerny has been doing this year.
Why is every one trolling if they aren't sucking Sony balls.
Please elaborate how is the ps4 built for efficiency/reliabilty?
You can say the same for the XB1 as well. Innovation is in the eye of the beholder. Is the tech innovative? Probably not (and that's both systems), but the GAMES are the true measure of innovation. From what we've seen of the PS4 selection, they are definitely aiming for innovation in that direction as they always have. (Hence a good focus on indies who can bring some innovative titles to the system)
Say what you want, but ever since the PS1, the playstation game library has some of the most innovative and creative game titles out there so why would it stop now?
Its crazy how sony Is moving towards real innovation like ip tv where MS is still trying to mess with cableboxes. Think about it
Microsoft has been working on an iptv solution for years. And I thought you Sony fans don't want no tv in your console.
Can you even elaborate how the Xbox1 is built for efficiency/reliabilty? I can give you some links to articles or post some youtube videos, but you is crazy & trolling if you think i'm gonna type all that technical-shyt out.
Here 's a nice article from yesterday:
VGLeaks: More EXCLUSIVE PlayStation 4 hUMA implementation and memory enhancements details
I dont know what game systems you have owned but it sounds like you have been primarily a Sony fan. Yes PS1, 2 and PS3 has had some innovating games. But in my gaming lifetime I had The sega saturn and dreamcast in edition to other systems including sony which was full of innovative games. A rational person can not say MS has not brought innovation with the OG Xbox and the 360. The Xbox one is going to be innovative too. Now you may not like the features, thats a personal choice.
I already did. And I didn't need to type out a bunch of stuff.
Y'all just keep posting buzzwords and thinking your doing something. HUMA is simply a marketing term for AMDs unified memory access solution. There Are plenty of ways to achieve this and HUMA is one.
Now you tell me in your own words how huma(which ps4 doesn't technicaly have) makes the ps4 more efficient/reliable.
Whats to think about? MS is already doing that with some channel/partners and Im sure they going to expand. Plus you selectively picking and choosing on what you "call" innovations is because of what your system offers. Most people have cables/sat. Miss me with this whole I don't watch tv BS some cling too.
Actually I do but cable/sat isn't something new or innovate and Is actually becoming obsolete. So why build your console around tech that's on the brink of extinction? That's like putting a carbonator on a LSA engine
Or like putting Bluetooth in a "next gen" system
But in all seriousness as of today most people consume tv through cable/sat the hdmi in port is there to appease those people as the switch to digital tv takes place.
It's innovative because they are adding voice/motion controls and interactive experiences to your normal everyday tv viewing.
No you didn't!!!! All you did was give a general statement. @Rekkapryde did a better job than you did. You didn't explain to us how the XB1's architecture was gonna be more efficient or more reliable than the PS4's architecture.
its custom that's why!!!
Rekka did nothing but spew ps4 Stan buzzwords that none of you truly understand.
All the things he listed are there to make it easier on the devs. But they have nothing to do with efficiency reliabilty. Furthermore xbox one employs unified memory and "HUMA" as well.
Rekka was wrong in his assessment that gddr5 made the system more efficient. In fact one of the biggest reasons ddr3 was used was for efficient power consumption.