PS4 and 720 to be revealed in MARCH!! PS4 out the door first!

[Fatboi1]

Actualy halo 3 did

Halo 3 sold what 10 million and Uc 1 2 and 3 sold over 17 million. You flunked Math?

UC3 can be done on xbox stop the nonsense,

Xbox Cpu>>Ps3 Cpu
Ps3 GPU>>Xbox GPU

This is a fact they're a wash stop the bs.

So within the last 7 years 360 been out, no game has come out looking better than UC3 and performs as good as it does. Even the Tomb Raider game looks to be rough around the edges.

If the 360 was able to match those visuals, they'd do it already. It didn't take PS3 6-7 years to make UC2 visuals. Hell Killzone TWO still looks better than everything on the 360.

 

[Loose]

Halo 3 sold what 10 million and Uc 1 2 and 3 sold over 17 million. You flunked Math?


So within the last 7 years 360 been out, no game has come out looking better than UC3 and performs as good as it does. Even the Tomb Raider game looks to be rough around the edges.

If the 360 was able to match those visuals, they'd do it already. It didn't take PS3 6-7 years to make UC2 visuals. Hell Killzone TWO still looks better than everything on the 360.

I personally think KZ runs like shyt so i dont even know why you bringing that game up

 

[Fatboi1]

I personally think KZ runs like shyt so i dont even know why you bringing that game up

Crackheads personally think Crack is that sh1t!

I may quote this. Killzone 2 runs like shyt.


You Xbots will say ANYTHING.

Halo 4

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Yea it's my opinion that UC3 uses up a lot of the PS3's power because it can be done on the 360. Funny thing is I haven't seen nor heard of a game on 360 that has better graphics. Even Halo 4 had to cut down on some stuff to save for some of it's more impressive parts. Your in denial brother.

5 Games that look better than Uncharted 2 - Being Nerdy

Gears of War 3′s Graphics Have Just Raised the Bar – Video | TQcast


Gears 3 vs Uncharted 3 beta graphics comparison: Which game looks better? | N4G



It's all subjective, but the point is that uncharted is not hands down better lookiing than other games, and the marginal advantage it might have over other games is not worth the time or money it took to make the game. Gears came out in 06 it took Sony's until 2009 to outdo that game.

 

[courtdog]

Wow, these 3cepts have been lying to you all. I have to give these dudes credit for at least trying
First off, look how delusional this clown is.. please investigate ppl...

*sees title of article*
*sees no PS4 reveal at E3 2012, sees PS3 SUPPORT for 10 years*



Your lack of reading comprehension is

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

This dude straight up created a whole new reality from the article. Read it, then in his retarded mind changed the meaning of the link. Reading comp is literally impossible when your a full fledged fanboy ok. Don't end up like this guy.. Hate it had to be him

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

@Fatboi1


Additional Ether:
FXAA creator comments on Orbis, Durango - NeoGAF

"Working assuming the Eurogamer Article is mostly correct with the exception of maybe exact clocks, amount of memory, and number of enabled cores (all of which could easily change to adapt to yields)....
PS4
The real reason to get excited about a PS4 is what Sony as a company does with the OS and system libraries as a platform, and what this enables 1st party studios to do, when they make PS4-only games. If PS4 has a real-time OS, with a libGCM style low level access to the GPU, then the PS4 1st party games will be years ahead of the PC simply because it opens up what is possible on the GPU. Note this won't happen right away on launch, but once developers tool up for the platform, this will be the case. As a PC guy who knows hardware to the metal, I spend most of my days in frustration knowing damn well what I could do with the hardware, but what I cannot do because Microsoft and IHVs wont provide low-level GPU access in PC APIs. One simple example, drawcalls on PC have easily 10x to 100x the overhead of a console with a libGCM style API...."


Xbox720
Working here assuming the Eurogamer Article is close to correct. On this platform I'd be concerned with memory bandwidth. Only DDR3 for system/GPU memory pared with 32MB of "ESRAM" sounds troubling....If this GPU is pre-GCN with a serious performance gap to PS4, then this next Xbox will act like a boat anchor, dragging down the min-spec target for cross-platform next-generation games.

My guess is that the real reason for 8GB of memory is because this box is a DVR which actually runs "Windows" (which requires a GB or two or three of "overhead"), but like Windows RT (Windows on ARM) only exposes a non-desktop UI to the user. There are a bunch of reasons they might ditch the real-time console OS, one being that if they don't provide low level access to developers, that it might enable a faster refresh on backwards compatible hardware. In theory the developer just targets the box like it was a special DX11 "PC" with a few extra changes like hints for surfaces which should go in ESRAM, then on the next refresh hardware, all prior games just get better FPS or resolution or AA. Of course if they do that, then it is just another PC, just lower performance, with all the latency baggage, and lack of low level magic which makes 1st party games stand out and sell the platform.

We aint done yet...

"A fast GDDR5 will be the desired option for developers. All the interesting cases for good anti-aliasing require a large amount of bandwidth and RAM. A tiny 32MB chunk of ESRAM will not fit that need even for forward rendering at 1080p. I think some developers could hit 1080p@60fps with the rumored Orbis specs even with good AA. My personal project is targeting 1080p@60fps with great AA on a 560ti which is a little slower than the rumored Orbis specs. There is no way my engine would hit that target on the rumored 720 specs. Ultimately on Orbis I guess devs target 1080p/30fps (with some motion blur) and leverage the lower latency OS stack and scan out at 60fps (double scan frames) to provide a really great lower-latency experience. Maybe the same title on 720 would render at 720p/30fps, and maybe Microsoft is dedicating a few CPU hardware threads to the GPU driver stack to remove the latency problem (assuming this is a "Windows" OS under the covers)."

Now whats wonderful about this is besides it being some random unknown. I read that exact same shyt and what Rekka failed to do was post the REST OF IT where real dev's come in and skool his ass on how Durango is better equipped than what he thinks because he wasn't aware of the Xbox's custom GCN or "Odan" chip which erases all that nonsense he was thinkin.
After that sonning, he took the article down. But nice try dummy.
On top of that, Xbox isn't even thinkin about sony anymore. They tryna outgun Apple right now cuz sony & nintnedo lookin aka Seeeegaaaaaaa
Apple is bringing IOS to Apple TV, but thats another story...

I know plenty people, including myself, with an OG working ps3. :lookherebruh:


Don't forget that MS even tried to say that the RROD was bullshyt.

I know for a fact you lying. On Sohh your system went the way of the YLOD
Its so demonic... and M$ never said it was bullshyt
Regardless, they took care of us. Unlike sony who never took care of shyt for Disc Read Error. But you blindly said "fukk that, I'll pay $600 for a system that will die on me once they finally make a decent game for it"

 

[courtdog]

Halo 3 sold what 10 million and Uc 1 2 and 3 sold over 17 million. You flunked Math?

The math suggest your adding shipped instead of sold.
You the same idiot trying to claim UC3 sold 4mil in a month when it was already reported they didn't even sell 1million copies during all of 2011

You guys are sohh demonic

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Halo 3 sold what 10 million and Uc 1 2 and 3 sold over 17 million. You flunked Math?

I was talking about in America, but your figures are wrong anyway. Uncharted is just over 16 million and halo 3 is at just under 12. But if we are looking at worldwide sales halo 3 plus one of its spinoffs sold more than all three uncharted games plus its spinoff

So within the last 7 years 360 been out, no game has come out looking better than UC3 and performs as good as it does. Even the Tomb Raider game looks to be rough around the edges.

That's your opinion but there are plenty of games that are comparable in graphics and performance to uc3

If the 360 was able to match those visuals, they'd do it already. It didn't take PS3 6-7 years to make UC2 visuals. Hell Killzone TWO still looks better than everything on the 360.

Not true at all

 

[Fatboi1]

5 Games that look better than Uncharted 2 - Being Nerdy
Wow you posted 5 games that are clearly talking about their PC versions. Are you dumb?? I was talking about consoles clearly and those games on consoles DO NOT look better.



Gears of War 3′s Graphics Have Just Raised the Bar – Video | TQcast
And? We're not talking about whether Gears 3 has good graphics. We're talking about whether they're shytting on UC3's which is false.

Gears 3 vs Uncharted 3 beta graphics comparison: Which game looks better? | N4G
I don't even have to click that link to know that it's the beta comparison. Launch came through and it was a different story.


It's all subjective, but the point is that uncharted is not hands down better lookiing than other games, and the marginal advantage it might have over other games is not worth the time or money it took to make the game. Gears came out in 06 it took Sony's until 2009 to outdo that game.
Breh Uncharted ONE looked better than Gears 1 and UC1 didn't debut until 07 so what is you saying?? Stop playing with ya boy. MGS4, UC1, Killzone 2 etc looked better.

 

[courtdog]

^^^ Oh, so uncharted 2 set a benchmark in graphics over PC games too ^^^


These dudes so demonic

 

[b_low_brown]

at Xbox Stan's acting like higher sales = a better game

Who tf cares if halo sold more? Lets take a look at Call of Duty's sales.. & that series been fell off.

PS3 exclusives were better than the 360s this gen. 360 had pretty much everything else going for it though, but you'd be a fool to think 360 had better exclusives.

 

[Fatboi1]

I was talking about in America, but your figures are wrong anyway. Uncharted is just over 16 million and halo 3 is at just under 12. But if we are looking at worldwide sales halo 3 plus one of its spinoffs sold more than all three uncharted games plus its spinoff

Your a waste of my time you clearly are just spewing conjecture. Halo 3 WORLDWIDE sales are 10 million. Halo 3 didn't sell shyt worldwide so it's still 10 million dummy. If we're talking America then yea but that's a given Halo been out and is a much more successful franchise. You guys have to move the goalpost around plenty of times to prove a point. When sales are good for PS3 games you try to say other countries don't count . SMH
Why don't we compare Infamous 1 and 2 which garnered better reviews and sales to Crackdown for 360?? Of course though your gonna try to find a way to stealth imply the game sucks because it was on PSN+.


That's your opinion but there are plenty of games that are comparable in graphics and performance to uc3
Comparable yes but for comparable purposes only. Technically UC3 is peerless.

Not true at all
Your just playing stupid and arguing just to argue, you know Killzone 2 looks more graphically advanced than most games out today. Only game close to it is Crysis 2 and Crysis 3 on consoles and they are just close and don't even shyt on it.

 

[Fatboi1]

^^^ Oh, so uncharted 2 set a benchmark in graphics over PC games too ^^^


These dudes so demonic

We were talking consoles strictly. PC gaming graphics are light years ahead of consoles right now except for a few games like UC3, God of War 3 and Last of US. You can't really refute that though..

 

[b_low_brown]

I personally think KZ runs like shyt

This thread is hilarious

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Wow you posted 5 games that are clearly talking about their PC versions. Are you dumb?? I was talking about consoles clearly and those games on consoles DO NOT look better.

Crysis 2 is the best-looking console/PC game to date.

And no the article isn't just talking about pc games

And? We're not talking about whether Gears 3 has good graphics. We're talking about whether they're shytting on UC3's which is false.

Never said it was shyting on uncharted. I said uncharted wasn't shytting on gears, which has been proven.

I don't even have to click that link to know that it's the beta comparison. Launch came through and it was a different story.

Graphics don't change from betas and this just proves gears multiplayer looks better than uncharted multiplayer.

Breh Uncharted ONE looked better than Gears 1 and UC1 didn't debut until 07 so what is you saying?? Stop playing with ya boy. MGS4, UC1, Killzone 2 etc looked better.

Delusions of a fanboy

 

[Fatboi1]

And no the article isn't just talking about pc games

Those people are on crack. Crysis 2 does not look better than Killzone 3.

Never said it was shyting on uncharted. I said uncharted wasn't shytting on gears, which has been proven.

whatever.
Graphics don't change from betas and this just proves gears multiplayer looks better than uncharted multiplayer.

They dont?
You know I remember vividly UC3 summer beta to launch MP graphics being much improved but again you need no proof because your stopitslime smiley proves everything. I also remember the map "checkout" on the Gears beta looking different on the retail. Same thing with the map thrashball and the other sandstorm map.. But let's pretend that beta's are the final versions. You making me sound like I don't like Gears 3 when that's nonsense I love that MP. I think Gears 3 MP>>>>UC3 MP overall.

Delusions of a fanboy
So saying MGS4, KZ2, UC1 having better gfx than Gears 1 is now delusional and isn't subjective?