PS3 NCAA 13 Online Dynasty League Thread!!!

L@CaT

For Hire Gunslinger!
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
15,735
Reputation
-695
Daps
27,344
@MMSex I ran 1-5-5 One Fukin Play yesterday :russ:

I ran Seattle 0 Times on your Ass Yesterday

So what do you have to complain about?


You lost because You couldnt stop my Run (I stopped yours however) and you Committed 4 Turnovers


Has nothing to do with so called Broken Plays.. Thats why I chose not to Run Seattle On your Wack Ass.. So you couldnt complain about some dumbshyt when you lost


But of course anytime @MMSex Loses it has nothing to do with Scheme but a Broken game or play :stopitslime:

You're not that good
 
Last edited by a moderator:

L@CaT

For Hire Gunslinger!
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
15,735
Reputation
-695
Daps
27,344
@Rekkapryde its not allowing to log into the dynasty :damn:

I want to get this in before I leave in 1 Hour, if not i wont be able till tonight
 
Last edited by a moderator:

L@CaT

For Hire Gunslinger!
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
15,735
Reputation
-695
Daps
27,344
@Rekkapryde is there a way you can boot me and reinvite me?

Im getting some sort of strange error when I log In.. It doesnt seem to effect other dyasties though, just this one :damn:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
151,021
Reputation
27,918
Daps
509,134
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
@Rekkapryde is there a way you can boot me and reinvite me?

Im getting some sort of strange error when I log In.. It doesnt seem to effect other dyasties though, just this one :damn:

I don't think I can reinvite from the website. I can only boot you which I just did. I was at lunch mayne.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,527
Reputation
3,723
Daps
31,531
Reppin
Auburn, AL
@MMSex I ran 1-5-5 One Fukin Play yesterday :russ:

I ran Seattle 0 Times on your Ass Yesterday

So what do you have to complain about?


You lost because You couldnt stop my Run (I stopped yours however) and you Committed 4 Turnovers


Has nothing to do with so called Broken Plays.. Thats why I chose not to Run Seattle On your Wack Ass.. So you couldnt complain about some dumbshyt when you lost


But of course anytime @MMSex Loses it has nothing to do with Scheme but a Broken game or play :stopitslime:

You're not that good

i lost to @Django337 and and @No Sleep and it had nothing to do with broken plays :ufdup:

they out schemed me

like i BEEN said, its not just 1 play with you two

its a multitude. its the very fabric of the way you play :wow: wanna know why you had to punt that last drive

its cause i ran a line nano :russ: i shouldnt have to play like that just to get you off the field

and please, you didnt stop any sort of offense of mine, i had 8 yards per carry even while passing for over 500 :russ: a NORMAL player wont sit in nickel AUDIBLE to 3-4 to have faster players on the field and put 9 in the box all game :comeon: even still my deep ball still shredded you but i still dont like playing that way

there were several third downs where you instantly went back to your cheese pass plays to keep converting :heh: like you can pretend that the run won you the game but when you have TE's running free like that i cant load the box

like i said, if what you did was minutely realistic you wouldnt have free men even moreso you wouldnt be throwing the same damn routes all game when you get stuck in a bind. Even my deep out and skinny post rely on timing. ur shyt is literally wide open off the snap :skip: so please dont compare your youtubing to the hours of practice i put in to play a sim game
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,527
Reputation
3,723
Daps
31,531
Reppin
Auburn, AL
:ufdup:

What you mean "nano".... :birdman:

I can send 4 but make the oline think I'm sending 6

And I don't have to reposition linebackers, this is another reason people sit in faq nickel/dime all game cause its easier to do out of those formations

If I have a shyt I could document it everytime I see it but I play dynasty as a refresh from playing arcade ranked matches

When I get home ill break it down for you
 

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,527
Reputation
3,723
Daps
31,531
Reppin
Auburn, AL
1) ok to preface this

when you were :ufdup: at me when we played in season, i actually sent 6(its the same as the old school thunder green with both LBs attacking the B gap
Gaps.png


if it was a nano, one of or two those down linemen is actually in zone or contain/or spy

all a nano really is, is a fabricated zoneblitz

now back in the day before we had line shifts, nano's made the game unbearable but once you know where to expect them a simple shift of the line stops basically all of them. the problem is when ur running the ball

because line shifts wont make ur linemen block them any better. they are still coming free

--------------------------------------------

2) you dont have to reposition linebackers manually to pull off nano's

using show blitz and either reblitzing(manually hot route blitz) + hot routing the other players can be done within 2-3 seconds if you practice(Don Dada and L@cat do this fairly easy)

now i need it to be said, neither of them use A-gap nanos anymore(L@cat used too but he doesnt now) A-gap is the one everyone dreads because its the fastest. I only know B-gap and C-gap nanos(4-3 over and under are the only ones i can natively have 5-6 linemen down, my nickel formations would involve manual movement...unlike the 3-4 set nickel packages :usure:)

more or less a b-gap nano involves getting 6 guys on the line then crashing from the side with more players, and whatever linemen are on the opposite guard and the center need to be in spy and contain respectively...if you reblitz the linebacker who came down when you showed blitz..you now have 4 rushers with 1 to cover screens and 1 player to cover short passes over the middle while getting roughly 2 second b-gap heat

BUT like i said a simple shift to that side kills the nano.(ask @Don Dada F Poppa where i tested it, if he is real as he says he knows im saying 100% truth right now)

------------------------------------------------

3) nano's are defendable...shyt like seattle isnt. and to an experienced player one play doesnt break the game clearly we arent stupid. but just KNOWING that play could come from a certain package makes playing defense terrible. because unlike line stunts etc you CANNOT fix CPU coverage..period so if a route gets inside position or free release thats the end of it. unless you manually defend a route its gonna be open. And if you manually defend you bring up the possibility of longer gains as illustrated by the vid Don Dada posted.

unlike normal pass plays where you go through a progression of whos open. broken routes simply are open. and if they arent there is always a second read within 2 seconds. that first route is open <1 and caught in stride(aka big yardage). Outside of HB into the flats or stick...normal players dont have routes like that

------------------------------------------------------

so in closing @Rekkapryde , your rule for manually moving LBs wont stop anyone from nano'ing and broken routes have been rampant between the "pac-12" teams since season 1. this is why even when i put up 87 it didnt take much for L@cat to put up 50. Contrast with me and Shugg or me and No Sleep that are closer to 28-21 games and 17-14 etc eventually if you start paying attention more youll see what i see. Its not one play or two plays but a play style. Its not sim and unlike back in the day there are many creative ways to get players wide open in this game compared to previous..its equivalent to how rocket catching used to be.

and mossing =/= rocket catching. I threw 7-8 fades on L@cat which were all successfully tipped away manually. and even tho im throwing shade on him i dont dislike him as a person just his game :ehh: hes pretty straight outside of his cheese strategies. unlike some virgins but in his own words relating to his knowledge of the game:

Bro there is nothing sim about your game @MMSex. You stay in shotgun all game long.

Your runs consist of sweeps and outside runs (nothing in between tackle) and fades that's it

Shut the fuk up about you being Sim than everyone else. My under center scheme is more SIM than you period :merchant:
what does formation have to do with sim :ohhh: in fact i run dives probably 70% of the time but because im facing B-gap nanos from nickel all game i have to run counters away from it :russ: so take it how you want it
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
151,021
Reputation
27,918
Daps
509,134
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
A nano isn't defendable. If it is, it isn't a nano IMO


I'm only going by what YOU said. Not me. :mjpls:

Besides
In our game, I WATCHED you move that LB manually and saw him come in untouched. Now you didn't do it again, so I let it go. (Wouldn't have mattered anyway)

Like I said, YOU said the dreaded nano word, not me.

If you are just running an existing play using the preset shifts and such without manipulating the AI so your guy can come in untouched, I don't classify that as a nano.


So if the above was the case, I honestly could care less.
 

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,527
Reputation
3,723
Daps
31,531
Reppin
Auburn, AL
A nano isn't defendable. If it is, it isn't a nano IMO


I'm only going by what YOU said. Not me. :mjpls:

Besides
In our game, I WATCHED you move that LB manually and saw him come in untouched. Now you didn't do it again, so I let it go. (Wouldn't have mattered anyway)

Like I said, YOU said the dreaded nano word, not me.

If you are just running an existing play using the preset shifts and such without manipulating the AI so your guy can come in untouched, I don't classify that as a nano.


So if the above was the case, I honestly could care less.
simply put sending 6 and you only defending with 5 is LEGIT

if i sent 6 and you blocked with 6 and i still got heat then you might have some thing to stand on :ld:

eitherway, ur turning your eye from a problem that is alot worse than nano's

nano's ARE defendable its just average players dont pay attention to manual line shifting..period. Now on that note the more i learn the more i respect folks who come up with them because in truth. they are built into the system

the problem is the AI is correct only for passing situations but not running. a nano if done right blows up run plays. and thats where its bad. eitherway ive broken it down as simple as i can for ya. If you down for alla that seattle ball do you :youngsabo: cause they are doing both. and most folks are just too slow to see it

B-gap nano is just slow enough to appear to be normal.

and with ur final edit if youre gonna willingly accept cheese plays when they have been listed multiple times. then fine brah :ehh: folks who play like that normally get booted
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
151,021
Reputation
27,918
Daps
509,134
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
B-gap nano is just slow enough to appear to be normal.

And that's fine IMO. But if as soon as I hike the ball I'm getting tackled or the guy is coming through untouched every time, that is a problem (I'm sure you'd agree). A Gap blitzes are notorious for that fo sho.

I honestly haven't seen too much nano'ing in this league either (thankfully), but since you are the "nano" expert.





I'll be relying on you to investigate/call out this shyt going forward.




3996947_o.gif





:lookherebruh:
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
151,021
Reputation
27,918
Daps
509,134
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
And @Django337

1) Seattle is defendable as well, but like I told MMS, someone can easily cry wolf over it.

2) What @MMSex does would be similar above to 1) as it would be damn near impossible to regulate. A simple lineshift solves the problem. If no LB is being moved and it's a simple lineman stunt, there's no way in hell to regulate that.


@L@CaT @Don Dada F Poppa @SilkkTheStalker @RichSincethe80s @Sonny Corinthos @KingsnBucs1987

What do you all think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MMS

Intensity Integrity Intelligence
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,527
Reputation
3,723
Daps
31,531
Reppin
Auburn, AL
And that's fine IMO. But if as soon as I hike the ball I'm getting tackled or the guy is coming through untouched every time, that is a problem (I'm sure you'd agree). A Gap blitzes are notorious for that fo sho.

I honestly haven't seen too much nano'ing in this league either (thankfully), but since you are the "nano" expert.





I'll be relying on you to investigate/call out this shyt going forward.




3996947_o.gif




:lookherebruh:

A-gap blitz =/= A-gap nano

:snoop:

a normal A-gap blitz is actually going to be picked up 9/10 for the first 1.5 sec and the RE is going to be free. A-gap nano is obvious cause youll see a DT go into spy/contain and one of the linebackers will be free up the middle

i dont know if i want to play when youve had youtube evidence levied against people yet you do nothing :beli: thats my problem

you are hee hawing over the word nano but we've had pages about a play that i called out within 5 pages of this thread :usure: whats the point

this isnt a rules thing, its how long do you wanna allow shyt when you arent going to do anything about it :beli: seattle is NOT defendable thats what you dont get(and it isnt the only play either)

wanna know how i stopped it? i turned on big hits and put faith in the game

and even then i still gave up 50 twice :skip: get real
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
151,021
Reputation
27,918
Daps
509,134
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
i dont know if i want to play when youve had youtube evidence levied against people yet you do nothing :beli: thats my problem

And like I told you, the burden of proof is on you. There's no way to prove it and you are proving my exact point in how impossible it would be to regulate that play. @L@CaT said he didn't run it at all during your game. You said he did.

See the problem. :lookherebruh:

Just like I can claim you ran an A-Gap nano blitz and you say you didn't, etc.

Your best friend @Django337 wants sanctions on you for running your lineman nano/stunt but it's all the same to me in how in each situation, what do you do to outlaw it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top