Great Play call at the Right Time And the Play was never offically banned.. Nothing in the Rules on the Front page stating it is banned
If he wants to ban it offically starting next season so be it
until then
Last edited by a moderator:
PS3 NCAA 13 Online Dynasty League Thread!!!
- Thread starter Rekkapryde
- Start date
Great Play call at the Right Time And the Play was never offically banned.. Nothing in the Rules on the Front page stating it is banned
If he wants to ban it offically starting next season so be it
until then
GetYaWeigtUp
Rookie
Thats actually the cheesiest play on the game... It's all over youtube along with a slew of other money plays. Yes... routes that kill the defensive AI no matter what you call. Go check em out for yourself.
And the Play was never offically banned.. Nothing in the Rules on the Front page stating it is banned
If he wants to ban it offically starting next season so be it
until then
And the Play was never offically banned.. Nothing in the Rules on the Front page stating it is banned
If he wants to ban it offically starting next season so be it
until then
Guess I never did post it up front.... but guess what
It's going in there now.
Seattle is officially banned as of now. :lookherebruh:
And the Play was never offically banned.. Nothing in the Rules on the Front page stating it is banned
If he wants to ban it offically starting next season so be it
until then
BLATANT cheesing is cause for removal and from playing everyone in here, I haven't experienced any nano's or cheese by anyone (I think).
The Seattle play as far as I'm concerened is banned as of now. If you use it and get caught (key word GET CAUGHT), you getting hammered. It's plain and simple.
Run Seattle on me and see you get crushed...
Secondly, there is nothing on the Internet that States its a Glitchy play.. Money Play? Yes.. Glitchy? No Unstoppable? Hell the FUk No
Like I stated if I WAS ABUSING THE PLAY OVER AND OVER THATS CHEESE.. IF IM RUNNING IT PART OF SCHEME WHERE then I dont see what the problem Is
I may run Seattle 2 or 3 Times a game at most now
You Just played Horrible defense that last play of the Half
enforce sanctions :welcome:
You know that using the dreaded "nano" word was bad.
Using 4 linemen isn't a blitz and what you explained makes sense to me.
Your boy Shuggar Baby "claims" you nano'd him with some LBs coming.
My whole point in this discussion is that cats can and will cry foul when they lose and we all have seen it happening in here. I don't like that shyt. Just take your L, shutup, and keep it moving
BLATANT cheesing is cause for removal and from playing everyone in here, I haven't experienced any nano's or cheese by anyone (I think
The Seattle play as far as I'm concerened is banned as of now. If you use it and get caught (key word GET CAUGHT), you getting hammered. It's plain and simple.
You know that using the dreaded "nano" word was bad.
Using 4 linemen isn't a blitz and what you explained makes sense to me.
Your boy Shuggar Baby "claims" you nano'd him with some LBs coming.
My whole point in this discussion is that cats can and will cry foul when they lose and we all have seen it happening in here. I don't like that shyt. Just take your L, shutup, and keep it moving
BLATANT cheesing is cause for removal and from playing everyone in here, I haven't experienced any nano's or cheese by anyone (I think
The Seattle play as far as I'm concerened is banned as of now. If you use it and get caught (key word GET CAUGHT), you getting hammered. It's plain and simple.
@Rekkapryde i want sanctions you said this twice
Last edited by a moderator:
And Im still going to win my 3rd ship in 4 years
And you just played me and should no there is NOTHING CHEESE About how I Scheme that play.. I ran against You As Well but you didnt say sh1t.. Why? Because I only ran once or twice the whole game
YEt you want to ban a play that I barely run?
The Leagues Insecurites starting to show in full force
But under current guidlines I will no Longer run the Seattle Play
@Rekkapryde you stated this twice, and stated your executive order once...so logically, if you expect us to follow your executive order, then it can be assumed that you want us to follow the rule you stated twice.:smug:
Sanction USC for the OR game.
Last edited by a moderator:
Upon further review, you will be sitting nikkaz for your next user game and cpu game champ. my whole premise was not being able to prove it and Weigt was able to prove it. Same way OU got hammered even though it wasn't on the front page yet, you will have to sit cats.
@Django337
get the breakdown of who will sit.
@Django337
get the breakdown of who will sit.
Last edited by a moderator:
@Rekkapryde you stated this twice, and stated yur executive order once...so logically, if you expect us to follow your executive order, then it can be assumed that you want us to follow the rule you stated twice.
Sanction USC for the OR game.
Rule was never made official on Rules Page, it was still a debateable play at the time, in which he just made definitive
You're not going to win this one Shugg, if the Rule isnt stated on the Front Page then it is not a Rule Period
We cant start assuming or insuating a rule is in place when it is not written on the Rules Page now can we?
Last edited by a moderator:
Rule was never made official on Rules Page, it was still a debateable play at the time, in which he just made definitive
You're not going to win this one Shugg, if the Rule isnt stated on the Front Page then it is not a Rule Period
We cant start assuming or insuating a rule is in place when it is not written on the Rules Page now can we?
Excellent:smug:
Last edited by a moderator:
Rule was never made official on Rules Page, it was still a debateable play at the time, in which he just made definitive
You're not going to win this one Shugg, if the Rule isnt stated on the Front Page then it is not a Rule Period
We cant start assuming or insuating a rule is in place when it is not written on the Rules Page now can we?
@RichSincethe80s was hit for the new 28 point rule with 3 minutes left. It wasn't on the front page but he was notified twice in mentions.
Last edited by a moderator:
I cant agree with this... The Rule was never made offical on the Rule page..
If its not a definitive rule you cant retro actively make it a rule just because you got some evidence now..
If you want to make it an offical rule then STATE IS SO ON THE FIRST PAGE WHERE THERE WILL BE NO CONFUSION
But you NEVER DID THUS IT IS YOUR FAULT.. YOU CANT PUNISH ME FOR YOUR MISTAKE..
Thats absolutely bullshyt breh
Last edited by a moderator: