@Rekkapryde I say sanctions be enforced for the USC VS OR game!!!
Sit ALL his starters and a 10 schoolyard sanction for 2 years
Last edited by a moderator:
Seattle - LC@T Exposed - YouTube
Now what will be done... I didn't know this play was banned.
@Rekkapryde
Thats actually the cheesiest play on the game... It's all over youtube along with a slew of other money plays. Yes... routes that kill the defensive AI no matter what you call. Go check em out for yourself.Great Play call at the Right Time
And the Play was never offically banned.. Nothing in the Rules on the Front page stating it is banned
If he wants to ban it offically starting next season so be it
until then
Great Play call at the Right Time
And the Play was never offically banned.. Nothing in the Rules on the Front page stating it is banned
If he wants to ban it offically starting next season so be it
until then
Great Play call at the Right Time
And the Play was never offically banned.. Nothing in the Rules on the Front page stating it is banned
If he wants to ban it offically starting next season so be it
until then
BLATANT cheesing is cause for removal and from playing everyone in here, I haven't experienced any nano's or cheese by anyone (I think ).
The Seattle play as far as I'm concerened is banned as of now. If you use it and get caught (key word GET CAUGHT), you getting hammered. It's plain and simple.
Thats actually the cheesiest play on the game... It's all over youtube along with a slew of other money plays. Yes... routes that kill the defensive AI no matter what you call. Go check em out for yourself.
Guess I never did post it up front.... but guess what
It's going in there now.
Seattle is officially banned as of now. :lookherebruh:
enforce sanctions :welcome:
You know that using the dreaded "nano" word was bad.
Using 4 linemen isn't a blitz and what you explained makes sense to me.
Your boy Shuggar Baby "claims" you nano'd him with some LBs coming.
My whole point in this discussion is that cats can and will cry foul when they lose and we all have seen it happening in here. I don't like that shyt. Just take your L, shutup, and keep it moving
BLATANT cheesing is cause for removal and from playing everyone in here, I haven't experienced any nano's or cheese by anyone (I think ).
The Seattle play as far as I'm concerened is banned as of now. If you use it and get caught (key word GET CAUGHT), you getting hammered. It's plain and simple.
You know that using the dreaded "nano" word was bad.
Using 4 linemen isn't a blitz and what you explained makes sense to me.
Your boy Shuggar Baby "claims" you nano'd him with some LBs coming.
My whole point in this discussion is that cats can and will cry foul when they lose and we all have seen it happening in here. I don't like that shyt. Just take your L, shutup, and keep it moving
BLATANT cheesing is cause for removal and from playing everyone in here, I haven't experienced any nano's or cheese by anyone (I think ).
The Seattle play as far as I'm concerened is banned as of now. If you use it and get caught (key word GET CAUGHT), you getting hammered. It's plain and simple.
@Rekkapryde i want sanctions you said this twiceIt's not a nano because it doesn't work everytime. I tried it out myself.
It may work for MMS since he has a very highly rated DT and DE. You just can't do that shyt with a regular cats.
So this one is closed @Django337
The Seattle play is banned though.
Guess I never did post it up front.... but guess what
It's going in there now.
Seattle is officially banned as of now. :lookherebruh:
The Seattle play as far as I'm concerened is banned as of now. If you use it and get caught (key word GET CAUGHT), you getting hammered. It's plain and simple.
@Rekkapryde you stated this twice, and stated your executive order once...so logically, if you expect us to follow your executive order, then it can be assumed that you want us to follow the rule you stated twice.:smug:The Seattle play is banned though.
@Rekkapryde you stated this twice, and stated yur executive order once...so logically, if you expect us to follow your executive order, then it can be assumed that you want us to follow the rule you stated twice.
Sanction USC for the OR game.
Rule was never made official on Rules Page, it was still a debateable play at the time, in which he just made definitive
You're not going to win this one Shugg, if the Rule isnt stated on the Front Page then it is not a Rule Period
We cant start assuming or insuating a rule is in place when it is not written on the Rules Page now can we?
Upon further review, you will be sitting nikkaz for your next user game and cpu game champ. my whole premise was not being able to prove it and Weigt was able to prove it. Same way OU got hammered even though it wasn't on the front page yet, you will have to sit cats.
@Django337
get the breakdown of who will sit.
Rule was never made official on Rules Page, it was still a debateable play at the time, in which he just made definitive
You're not going to win this one Shugg, if the Rule isnt stated on the Front Page then it is not a Rule Period
We cant start assuming or insuating a rule is in place when it is not written on the Rules Page now can we?