Protein in Semen Acts On Female Brain to Prompt Ovulation

[4Eyez]

lol...what is wrong with you people? How insane and steeped in pseudoscientific quackery and possessing of an utter lack of understanding of the scientific method and what science is do you have to be to say alchemy and chemistry is the same thing?

Alchemy, depending upon the region and culture is a term that could used to describe either spiritual, mystical unscientific practices of attempting to understand the nature of matter and concerning itself with finding magical elixirs and that type of stuff, or the earliest attempts to turn metals into other metals.

The former is pure magical thinking with no basis in reality. The latter is earliest attempts at chemistry, and can be described as a protoscience at best.

Seriously, you and a few other posters are OBSESSED with using the word pseudo. Its like when a kid discovers a new word he likes and uses it consistently, its hilarious.

Your right, Alchemy isn't exactly Chemistry.

When alchemy was popular scientist didn't use the scientific method in their studies, they worked by trial and error, so that alone separates the two.

In case you didn't get the point, without alchemy there's very little chance there would of been chemistry. The earliest chemist were indeed alchemist beforehand. The fact that you believe alchemy strictly concerned itself with elixirs or metals and what not shows how your talking about something you literally have no idea about. Alchemy has made huge breakthroughs in science, especially in the chemistry and medical field, but has yet to be credited for.

Google harder next time

 

[Mowgli]

Seriously, you and a few other posters are OBSESSED with using the word pseudo. Its like when a kid discovers a new word he likes and uses it consistently, its hilarious.

Your right, Alchemy isn't exactly Chemistry.

When alchemy was popular scientist didn't use the scientific method in their studies, they worked by trial and error, so that alone separates the two.

In case you didn't get the point, without alchemy there's very little chance there would of been chemistry. The earliest chemist were indeed alchemist beforehand. The fact that you believe alchemy strictly concerned itself with elixirs or metals and what not shows how your talking about something you literally have no idea about. Alchemy has made huge breakthroughs in science, especially in the chemistry and medical field, but has yet to be credited for.

Google harder next time

Forgive that bat faced fakkit. His google degree didnt cover alchemy

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Seriously, you and a few other posters are OBSESSED with using the word pseudo. Its like when a kid discovers a new word he likes and uses it consistently, its hilarious.

Your right, Alchemy isn't exactly Chemistry.

When alchemy was popular scientist didn't use the scientific method in their studies, they worked by trial and error, so that alone separates the two.

In case you didn't get the point, without alchemy there's very little chance there would of been chemistry. The earliest chemist were indeed alchemist beforehand. The fact that you believe alchemy strictly concerned itself with elixirs or metals and what not shows how your talking about something you literally have no idea about. Alchemy has made huge breakthroughs in science, especially in the chemistry and medical field, but has yet to be credited for.

Google harder next time

Lol...you typed all that and made absolutely no point whatsoever. Learn how to read. I didn't say alchemy was strictly about elixirs and magic potions. If you actually read what you quoted from me and even took the time to bold, you would see I said alchemy was a blanket term used to describe both the earliest attempts at the application of altering forms of matter and a lot magical thinking about elixirs and that type of stuff. So alchemy was used to describe practices that were both protoscience and pseudoscience.

So as I said chemistry does not equal alchemy. If you think so you are a moron. If you don't, there's really nothing left for you to say. And I don't have to google anything idiot, I am a chemist. My education > your books from the new age section at Barnes and Noble.

 

[OsO]

What you described were all physical attributes that allow us to experience physical reality. Not a spiritual element to them.

Do you not understand?

The spiritual world is death, and as long as one is alive, access is denied.

but there IS a spiritual element to them. their full activation can allow for conscious access to a larger band of energy frequencies aka other dimensions aka other levels of consciousness/awareness aka the "spiritual realm"

there is no death. you only ceast to exist in the physical body you currently inhabit.

but if you believe your consciousness ceases to exist the moment your body does, then yes it may seem like a death

but fortunately for us all thats not the case.

love and respect your vessel, but remember it's just that, a vessel. a vessel to help you gain experiences which will evolve your SOUL, which is the true you.

i dont expect this to sink in all the way... im just planting seeds bro

Alchemy=chemistry? There's nothing I can do to help you.

chemistry evolved from the study of alchemy

alchemy is not chemistry

a mud hut is not architecture

alchemy at its highest levels contains all of chemistry, but chemistry at its highest level only encompasses maybe 10-15% of alchemy and that may be generous.

im not trying to get into which is better or worse because they both have their pros and cons, and in reality one should maximize on the knowledge of BOTH of these systems to fully master the subject.

alchemy has the power to transform your entire reality, manifesting using the tools from the creators toolbox... and modern chemistry has certainly systematized the elements and their characteristics for common comprehension in a very impressive fashion.

i show em both love

lol...what is wrong with you people? How insane and steeped in pseudoscientific quackery and possessing of an utter lack of understanding of the scientific method and what science is do you have to be to say alchemy and chemistry is the same thing?

Alchemy, depending upon the region and culture is a term that could used to describe either spiritual, mystical unscientific practices of attempting to understand the nature of matter and concerning itself with finding magical elixirs and that type of stuff, or the earliest attempts to turn metals into other metals.

The former is pure magical thinking with no basis in reality. The latter is earliest attempts at chemistry, and can be described as a protoscience at best.

alchemy birthed chemistry, you know what i mean

and did you have to wiki that definition of alchemy lol... its not even close to the full definition

but better than i thought you were capable of

Seriously, you and a few other posters are OBSESSED with using the word pseudo. Its like when a kid discovers a new word he likes and uses it consistently, its hilarious.

Your right, Alchemy isn't exactly Chemistry.

When alchemy was popular scientist didn't use the scientific method in their studies, they worked by trial and error, so that alone separates the two.

In case you didn't get the point, without alchemy there's very little chance there would of been chemistry. The earliest chemist were indeed alchemist beforehand. The fact that you believe alchemy strictly concerned itself with elixirs or metals and what not shows how your talking about something you literally have no idea about. Alchemy has made huge breakthroughs in science, especially in the chemistry and medical field, but has yet to be credited for.

Google harder next time

yea there's a HL crew that loves to use the term pseudo-science... theyre in love with the inside of the box, blinded by the veil and enamored by the light show lol

but i disagree with your point about ancient alchemy not utilizing the principles of the scientific method.

hypothesis, trial, reassess, record data, etc, all took place within alchemical trials.

 

[OsO]

Alchemy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Practical applications of alchemy produced a wide range of contributions to medicine and the physical sciences. The alchemist Robert Boyle[8] is credited as being the father of chemistry. Paracelsian iatrochemistry emphasized the medicinal application of alchemy (continued in plant alchemy, or spagyric).[9] Studies of alchemy also influenced Isaac Newton's theory of gravity.[10] Academic historical research supports that the alchemists were searching for a material substance using physical methods.[11]

It is a popular belief that alchemists made contributions to the "chemical" industries of the day—ore testing and refining, metalworking, production of gunpowder, ink, dyes, paints, cosmetics, leather tanning, ceramics, glass manufacture, preparation of extracts, liquors, and so on (it seems that the preparation of aqua vitae, the "water of life", was a fairly popular "experiment" among European alchemists). Alchemists contributed distillation to Western Europe. The attempts of alchemists to arrange information on substances, so as to clarify and anticipate the products of their chemical reactions, resulted in early conceptions of chemical elements and the first rudimentary periodic tables. They learned how to extract metals from ores, and how to compose many types of inorganic acids and bases.

During the 17th century, practical alchemy started to evolve into modern chemistry,[12] as it was renamed by Robert Boyle, the "father of modern chemistry".[13] In his book, The Skeptical Chymist, Boyle attacked Paracelsus and the natural philosophy of Aristotle, which was taught at universities. However, Boyle's biographers, in their emphasis that he laid the foundations of modern chemistry, neglect how steadily he clung to the scholastic sciences and to alchemy, in theory, practice and doctrine.[14] The decline of alchemy continued in the 18th century with the birth of modern chemistry, which provided a more precise and reliable framework within a new view of the universe based on rational

 

[4Eyez]

Lol...you typed all that and made absolutely no point whatsoever. Learn how to read. I didn't say alchemy was strictly about elixirs and magic potions. If you actually read what you quoted from me and even took the time to bold, you would see I said alchemy was a blanket term used to describe both the earliest attempts at the application of altering forms of matter and a lot magical thinking about elixirs and that type of stuff. So alchemy was used to describe practices that were both protoscience and pseudoscience.

So as I said chemistry does not equal alchemy. If you think so you are a moron. If you don't, there's really nothing left for you to say. And I don't have to google anything idiot, I am a chemist. My education > your books from the new age section at Barnes and Noble.

Now we're calling each other names?

EVERYONE knows chemistry doesn't equal alchemy.

That doesn't change why I wrote my first post. If it wasn't for alchemy, chemistry wouldn't be here today, along with medical procedures/treatments that are being used to this day. But you should know this more than anyone since your a chemist

Only in higher learning do people talk about shyt they know nothing about

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Now we're calling each other names?

EVERYONE knows chemistry doesn't equal alchemy.

That doesn't change why I wrote my first post. If it wasn't for alchemy, chemistry wouldn't be here today, along with medical procedures/treatments that are being used to this day. But you should know this more than anyone since your a chemist

Only in higher learning do people talk about shyt they know nothing about

lol...you quoted and bolded leyet saying verbatim "alchemy=chemistry"! You said you thought that was common knowledge. That's what I responded to.

Are you okay?