That forensic analysis50 people dapped this post
you said you took this with your android phone, when called out for how pixelated it was
but upon further investigating, the resolution of this picture is 537 x 537
android phones dont take pictures in that resolution
even if you used the lowest resolution on any current smart phone of the most recent years, it would be VGA, which is 640x480 the 2nd lowest resolution on an android would be 720x480 phones dont take pictures in 537x537 a picture like that is either from a very old camera(not a smart phone) or edited and saved at that resolution (which is what happened)
for you and the 50 dumbasses who dapped your picture
#PCGang
wickedsm said:There is no evidence to the contrary. This is the internet
****photoshopped. All these new phones out here in 2015 and your picture more pixelated than a 2006 motorola razr camera picture
picture is stolen and photoshopped thats why the text on the paper looks blurry.
if it was real the text would look clear because of camera focus on 2013 and newer phones
It matters because we need more bytches showing p*ssy on the coli. Why don't you get some of your thot friends to join?I wouldn't have proven shyt. None of these have to prove shyt. And if dudes ain't sending out dikk pics what does it matter who's female and who's not? Pretty sure admins could flip the switch if **** is lurking.
It'd be more troubling if she were an attractive broke bytch. Absolute complete failure.Brehs I think he's a man but just a counter argument on the picture debate is it possible she's broke as fukk and using a poor front facing camera?
LOL, I made a thread about that.You talking bad about the coli but you still posting here
50 people dapped this post
you said you took this with your android phone, when called out for how pixelated it was
but upon further investigating, the resolution of this picture is 537 x 537
android phones dont take pictures in that resolution
even if you used the lowest resolution on any current smart phone of the most recent years, it would be VGA, which is 640x480 the 2nd lowest resolution on an android would be 720x480 phones dont take pictures in 537x537 a picture like that is either from a very old camera(not a smart phone) or edited and saved at that resolution (which is what happened)
for you and the 50 dumbasses who dapped your picture
#PCGang
as broken down here;Brehs I think he's a man but just a counter argument on the picture debate is it possible she's broke as fukk and using a poor front facing camera?
50 people dapped this post
you said you took this with your android phone, when called out for how pixelated it was
but upon further investigating, the resolution of this picture is 537 x 537
android phones dont take pictures in that resolution
even if you used the lowest resolution on any current smart phone of the most recent years, it would be VGA, which is 640x480 the 2nd lowest resolution on an android would be 720x480 phones dont take pictures in 537x537 a picture like that is either from a very old camera(not a smart phone) or edited and saved at that resolution (which is what happened)
for you and the 50 dumbasses who dapped your picture
#PCGang
times 1000