Again the focus of the article revolves around the concentration and degree of advantages, you bringing up the Operation Varsity Blues cheating scandal is a red herring. You are conflating an outlier situation(in this context) that involved cheating, celebrity, and federal investigation vs actions that are prevalent, legal and involve people that are generally not famous--no one would expect them to be covered to the same extent, nor discussed in the same manner.
I'll acknowledge that the main point of the article and the scandal both showed the level of advantage present at the top, but the scandal from a values standpoint revolved around the role of dishonesty along with the advantage, not advantage per se or degrees of advantage. Even with the similarities, the scandal is not relevant to the article nor the points I have presented in this discussion.
And so, no. The scandal and the discussion afterward aren't representative of a prevalent conversation on the issues present in this thread.
I'm struggling to follow your line of thought so elaborate. Are you referring to the discussion of a) The role of Black kids getting into Stuyvesant and other specialized schools or b) The disparity between Stuyvesant and elite private schools?
Because the main part of the article I highlighted and afterward commented on was about issue b. And again given the accompanying notoriety, narratives, and competitiveness of Stuyvesant I am surprised that elite private schools still have exponential advantages over them. I don't think that piece of information along with the Black Ivy information is intuitive, common knowledge, or of little to no utility offline, on this forum, or in HL.