Prime Floyd "Money" Mayweather Jr vs Prime Felix "Tito" Trinidad at 147.....who wins?

Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
What ifs nikka?? can you read??

Prime Shane on steroids had 2 close fights with DLH

:flabbynsick:Shane off steroids many losses later had a close fight with Prime Cotto

You saying this nikka cotto is so great hed beat all the 147-154 nikkas from 90s to early 00s...meanwhile his resume his struggle fight after struggle fight...cept for that L against Trout the Monsta:mjlol:

Cotto's resume of wins is better than DLH tho

but you all you can do is come up with excuses that this dudes was washed up, not really good, or whatever

so its all good
 

King P

Legends Never Die
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
15,516
Reputation
3,412
Daps
48,598
Reppin
Views From The X
tito only has solid win at welterweight and thats DLH

Tito had plenty holes in his game, tito was challenged by lesser fighters than cotto
Pernell Whitaker?
Maurice Blocker?
Oba Carr?
Yuri Boy Campas?
Hector Camacho?

All those were solid wins

And Cotto was challenged by and lost to fighters lesser than Tito as well. His game was far from perfect too
 

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,472
Reputation
5,203
Daps
57,396
Reppin
Lauderdale
This the thing with you new boxing fans. nikkas can list fighter after fighter and tell you how good they were because you seen them with your very own eyes, but nikkas will dismiss it because it doesn't fall in line with the agenda that they're trying to push.

Glen Johnson was an undefeated very good pro when Hopkins stopped him, but that don't mean shyt cuz Johnson has a bunch of losses now. Never mind he was a fighter of the year once beating Woods, Roy and Tarver all in one year. That's just one example.

Vargas was beasting on nikkas an really only had 1 close fight with Winky who is a HOF caliber dude before he got destroyed by Tito in an epic war which took years off his career, but cats wanna act like the loss to Mayorga is what makes or breaks him. Never mind the win over Quartey.

It's always the same with nikkas like that. shyt on a nikkas best win, but hold them to their worst performance. :snoop:

Everybody should just collectively ignore these nikkas. Ain't no point in arguing with dudes like this.

Nobody worth their boxing gloves would ever say Cotto could beat Tito. Point blank period. I mean that's just as bad as saying Duran is equal to Mayorga.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
Pernell Whitaker?
Maurice Blocker?
Oba Carr?
Yuri Boy Campas?
Hector Camacho?

All those were solid wins

And Cotto was challenged by and lost to fighters lesser than Tito as well. His game was far from perfect too

Pernell Whitaker was passed it and people say he got robbed

Hector Comacho was passed it

Shane
Judah
Margarito are

better wins than Maurice Blocker
Oba Carr
Yori Boy Campas

also you naming fighters he beat in their mid 30's, yet Floyd fight guys younger than that, and they say their past their prime

you see that's the selective shyt I'm talking about
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
This the thing with you new boxing fans. nikkas can list fighter after fighter and tell you how good they were because you seen them with your very own eyes, but nikkas will dismiss it because it doesn't fall in line with the agenda that they're trying to push.

Glen Johnson was an undefeated very good pro when Hopkins stopped him, but that don't mean shyt cuz Johnson has a bunch of losses now. Never mind he was a fighter of the year once beating Woods, Roy and Tarver all in one year. That's just one example.

Vargas was beasting on nikkas an really only had 1 close fight with Winky who is a HOF caliber dude before he got destroyed by Tito in an epic war which took years off his career, but cats wanna act like the loss to Mayorga is what makes or breaks him. Never mind the win over Quartey.

It's always the same with nikkas like that. shyt on a nikkas best win, but hold them to their worst performance. :snoop:

Everybody should just collectively ignore these nikkas. Ain't no point in arguing with dudes like this.

Nobody worth their boxing gloves would ever say Cotto could beat Tito. Point blank period. I mean that's just as bad as saying Duran is equal to Mayorga.

I mentioned Glen Johnson already in this thread, I said I could not even remember who he fought at middleweight besides him
in the 90's

once again you bringing up vargas who is a light middle weight when I said WW division was weaker during Tito's era, you keep doing that

are you new to boxing nikka
 

King P

Legends Never Die
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
15,516
Reputation
3,412
Daps
48,598
Reppin
Views From The X
Pernell Whitaker was passed it and people say he got robbed

Hector Comacho was passed it

Shane
Judah
Margarito are

better wins than Maurice Blocker
Oba Carr
Yori Boy Campas

also you naming fighters he beat in their mid 30's, yet Floyd fight guys younger than that, and they say their past their prime

you see that's the selective shyt I'm talking about
:mindblown: Those people you speak of obviously didn't watch that fight. Tito beat Pernell from pillar to post. That was Sweat Pea's 1st real loss.

And if you wanna go there...

Mosley was also past it by then. And Judah by that time wasn't that good. Oba Carr >>> Judah. And Margarito was fighting with 1 eye.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
:mindblown: Those people you speak of obviously didn't watch that fight. Tito beat Pernell from pillar to post. That was Sweat Pea's 1st real loss.

And if you wanna go there...

Mosley was also past it by then. And Judah by that time wasn't that good. Oba Carr >>> Judah. And Margarito was fighting with 1 eye.

I'm sorry was confused with De La Hoya since he beat the same people except for Campas

either way Whittaker was past his prime man

yall always bring up that prime shyt, except when your talking about a fighter you like
 

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,472
Reputation
5,203
Daps
57,396
Reppin
Lauderdale
Sweet Pea robbed against Tito :what:

That's it I know this nikka don't know shyt about boxing. I'm done. I'm good. :pachaha:

Dude just saying anything that sounds smart or like it could have happened.

Next thing he'll be saying is that Reid robbed Tito as well. :heh:
 

King P

Legends Never Die
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
15,516
Reputation
3,412
Daps
48,598
Reppin
Views From The X
I'm sorry was confused with De La Hoya since he beat the same people except for Campas

either way Whittaker was past his prime man

yall always bring up that prime shyt, except when your talking about a fighter you like
He was past his prime, but that doesn't mean it wasn't a solid win. Pernell hadn't taken a "true" L until that point. He looked pretty good against Oscar. Just like Mosley was past his prime against Cotto, but it's still a solid win.

It's all about putting things in the proper perspective. You talking about "Cotto would beat DLH because he beat Mosley and DLH didn't" like they fought the same Mosley. That's not putting things in the proper perspective.

And mind you, I'm a fan of Floyd and Cotto, as well as Tito. But I'm not about to take shyt outta context and use bullshyt triangle theories just to prove a point.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
He was past his prime, but that doesn't mean it wasn't a solid win. Pernell hadn't taken a "true" L until that point. He looked pretty good against Oscar. Just like Mosley was past his prime against Cotto, but it's still a solid win.

It's all about putting things in the proper perspective. You talking about "Cotto would beat DLH because he beat Mosley and DLH didn't" like they fought the same Mosley. That's not putting things in the proper perspective.

And mind you, I'm a fan of Floyd and Cotto, as well as Tito. But I'm not about to take shyt outta context and use bullshyt triangle theories just to prove a point.

Okay see now that's reasonable

I'm saying Cotto would 100 percent win, I'm saying he could win, this nikkaz acting like Cotto don't belong in ring these motherfukkers

I'm not even shytting on tito, he can beat cotto, but cotto can also beat him

People be shytting on guys who have given us great matches in recent years, and boost up the past when at points times were not as good as they are now

thats all I'm saying
 

Road20

All Star
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
1,715
Reputation
600
Daps
4,304
Reppin
the Yay 510
If cotto can find a home for that left hook to the body then I think he has a chance. I just have a feeling that tito's left hook will have cotto on his bike and will be too far out of range to land it. like teddy atlas always says he gone have to pay for that real estate
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
Bottom line from a decade ago till this point one is the goat era for 140-168, this is what is holding up boxing right now, this will go down history as a golden
age at those weight classes, yall being disrespectful as fukk to these fighters, when these are exciting times in the sport


:russ:


1995-2014 is the GOAT era for 140-168?:dead:


nikka stop it:ufdup:
 
Top