This the thing with you new boxing fans. nikkas can list fighter after fighter and tell you how good they were because you seen them with your very own eyes, but nikkas will dismiss it because it doesn't fall in line with the agenda that they're trying to push.
Glen Johnson was an undefeated very good pro when Hopkins stopped him, but that don't mean shyt cuz Johnson has a bunch of losses now. Never mind he was a fighter of the year once beating Woods, Roy and Tarver all in one year. That's just one example.
Vargas was beasting on nikkas an really only had 1 close fight with Winky who is a HOF caliber dude before he got destroyed by Tito in an epic war which took years off his career, but cats wanna act like the loss to Mayorga is what makes or breaks him. Never mind the win over Quartey.
It's always the same with nikkas like that. shyt on a nikkas best win, but hold them to their worst performance.
Everybody should just collectively ignore these nikkas. Ain't no point in arguing with dudes like this.
Nobody worth their boxing gloves would ever say Cotto could beat Tito. Point blank period. I mean that's just as bad as saying Duran is equal to Mayorga.