Pressure the gov. of the Dominican Republic to stop its planned "cleaning" of 250k black Dominicans

OfTheCross

Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,338
Reputation
4,869
Daps
98,628
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high

-----

This account was for entertainment purposes only.
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
11,289
Reputation
624
Daps
14,362
Reppin
Paradise
Black folks its time to ask ourselves why are some SO MANY Mulattoes are so antiblack and so quick to worship whites EVEN when Whites treat them like step children at best?

DEEP analisys is need here.
 

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,110
Daps
7,059
Reppin
NULL
This is how I know you all are full of shyt LMAO@ people complained

Maaayyybeee just maybe that was the purpose of the immigration policy?

Hahahahahahahaha!
No it wasn't. You can tell by reading the article, they did this based on how they looked to the world. If the law was done for good reasons, this issue wouldn't even be an issue.

This is a quote from the article:

"As we said when promulgating the law 169-14, it does not fully satisfy the rights of all offspring born in the country of undocumented immigrants because, although returned citizenship to those who had been enrolled in the registry office, left as foreigners who could not enroll. Nevertheless, we accept the law as a political compromise.

As a result of this limitation, we have recorded the miserable picture of hundreds of families in which some children remain as Dominicans and others as foreigners in their own land. We know that over 8000 were registered in the National Plan of regularization of immigrants, but many others have not. That leaves them subject to deportation from the country as if they were undocumented aliens"[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:

NATU

Dios Patria y Libertad
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
228
Reputation
-260
Daps
130
Reppin
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
That was not the plan, you act like I can't read the article myself.
No, you just ignore the facts when it's not convenient for you. I have repeated millions of times here that the regularization plan 169-14 was made for those affected by the constitutional court ruling 68-13. You idiots kept ignoring it and calling me racist and what not.

The funny thing is that the only people that have discussed this isssue with logic have been me, @Arianne Martell @gonzo8402 @midwesthiphop and @beanz.. All you guys do is spread lies, express your hate for dominicans and insult the forumers who are bringing facts to this thread.
 

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,110
Daps
7,059
Reppin
NULL
No, you just ignore the facts when it's not convenient for you. I have repeated millions of times here that the regularization plan 169-14 was made for those affected by the constitutional court ruling 68-13. You idiots kept ignoring it and calling me racist and what not.

The funny thing is that the only people that have discussed this isssue with logic have been me, @Arianne Martell @gonzo8402 @midwesthiphop and @beanz.. All you guys do is spread lies, express your hate for dominicans and insult the forumers who are bringing facts to this thread.
Ding bat, you act like this makes them look proper. The law is still foul.

The article just states the people who had their documents revoked, had it returned. This is not about what we were originally arguing about.

And they did do it because of shame because it wasn't the government doing this because its the right thing to do, if that was the case, why did this happen:

"Human rights groups such as the Center Bono Institute say that without such documentation thousands of Dominicans can not study, get a job, open a bank account or even marry and register their children.

The Committee in Solidarity with the People denationalized explained that half of the population affected by the measure had not yet been able to validate their Dominican nationality.

In 2014, the Interamerican Court of Human Rights declared guilty of violations Dominican Republic "illegal and arbitrary detentions and subsequent summary of Dominican and Haitian people from Dominican Republic to Haiti expulsions" between 1999 and 2000."


It's funny how I'm proving my case on how foul the D.R. government is with the links @gonzo8402 is providing. That's how you know the shyt is foul, and a fool must have created the law. It's easy to see how full of shyt it is.

Did you read that? They were declared GUILTY of human rights violations. But let you, and the other people tell it, D.R. is an honest country. Do you know how foul that makes the country look to have human rights violations on their record? It's a big stain, and if they get taken to court again over this new mess they created, and are declared GUILTY again, trust me, the country will be in for a major change. Being that you live there, you need to be scared, because the land is a good investment, but investors will have to find ways to either get rid of the people there or take over the businesses. I suspect you will see a new form of gentrification, just like Puerto Rico is going through. The difference is Puerto Rico is part of the u.s.a., and the poor people can just migrate here for jobs, D.R. isn't. They can easily use these GUILTY verdicts against the country. All they have to do is explain to future investors that a new government is in the picture, give them some tax benefits, and build better housing. Once that happens, its a wrap!

You may laugh because you have no idea how people with money think, but YOU will be the main one paying for it. Everyone else in this thread doesn't love in D.R., they live here, so they can move on with their life, not YOU.
 
Last edited:

OfTheCross

Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,338
Reputation
4,869
Daps
98,628
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
No it wasn't. You can tell by reading the article, they did this based on how they looked to the world. If the law was done for good reasons, this issue wouldn't even be an issue.

This is a quote from the article:

"As we said when promulgating the law 169-14, it does not fully satisfy the rights of all offspring born in the country of undocumented immigrants because, although returned citizenship to those who had been enrolled in the registry office, left as foreigners who could not enroll. Nevertheless, we accept the law as a political compromise.

As a result of this limitation, we have recorded the miserable picture of hundreds of families in which some children remain as Dominicans and others as foreigners in their own land. We know that over 8000 were registered in the National Plan of regularization of immigrants, but many others have not. That leaves them subject to deportation from the country as if they were undocumented aliens"

Like I've been saying. Thank God the DR is an open, democratic, just, and verdant society.

If this was done because of political pressure, it was not because of the recent outcry.

After the Constitutional Court decision, and the subsequent reaction, internally and externally, the DR passed law 169-14. Once they had that plan in place they began to revise the current National Registry as requested by the court and have now released the list of people who are getting Regularized under the new law.

So, the law was, indeed, done for good reason. Without it, the Constitutional Court decision would stand and there'd be 500k+ pending deportations.
 

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,110
Daps
7,059
Reppin
NULL
Like I've been saying. Thank God the DR is an open, democratic, just, and verdant society.

If this was done because of political pressure, it was not because of the recent outcry.

After the Constitutional Court decision, and the subsequent reaction, internally and externally, the DR passed law 169-14. Once they had that plan in place they began to revise the current National Registry as requested by the court and have now released the list of people who are getting Regularized under the new law.

So, the law was, indeed, done for good reason. Without it, the Constitutional Court decision would stand and there'd be 500k+ pending deportations.
I explained in my last post, it wasn't the recent outcry, but it was still from shame. Read my last post.
 

OfTheCross

Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,338
Reputation
4,869
Daps
98,628
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
Ding bat, you act like this makes them look proper. The law is still foul.

The article just states the people who had their documents revoked, had it returned. This is not about what we were originally arguing about.

And they did do it because of shame because it wasn't the government doing this because its the right thing to do, if that was the case, why did this happen:

"Human rights groups such as the Center Bono Institute say that without such documentation thousands of Dominicans can not study, get a job, open a bank account or even marry and register their children.

The Committee in Solidarity with the People denationalized explained that half of the population affected by the measure had not yet been able to validate their Dominican nationality.

In 2014, the Interamerican Court of Human Rights declared guilty of violations Dominican Republic "illegal and arbitrary detentions and subsequent summary of Dominican and Haitian people from Dominican Republic to Haiti expulsions" between 1999 and 2000."


It's funny how I'm proving my case on how foul the D.R. government is with the links @gonzo8402 is providing. That's how you know the shyt is foul, and a fool must have created the law. It's easy to see how full of shyt it is.

Did you read that? They were declared GUILTY of human rights violations. But let you, and the other people tell it, D.R. is an honest country. Do you know how foul that makes the country look to have human rights violations on their record? It's a big stain, and if they get taken to court again over this new mess they created, and are declared GUILTY again, trust me, the country will be in for a major change. Being that you live there, you need to be scared, because the land is a good investment, but investors will have to find ways to either get rid of the people there or take over the businesses. I suspect you will see a new form of gentrification, just like Puerto Rico is going through. The difference is Puerto Rico is part of the u.s.a., and the poor people can just migrate here for jobs, D.R. isn't. They can easily use these GUILTY verdicts against the country. All they have to do is explain to future investors that a new government is in the picture, give them some tax benefits, and build better housing. Once that happens, its a wrap!

You may laugh because you have no idea how people with money think, but YOU will be the main one paying for it. Everyone else in this thread doesn't love in D.R., they live here, so they can move on with their life, not YOU.

Breh, you're arguing that a law passed last year is foul because of what the DR did between 1999 and 2000 :why:

I'm confused by your position right now.
 

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,110
Daps
7,059
Reppin
NULL
Latin America contains alot of countries and alot of different idiosyncrasies.. Dominicans are not your typical mexican or ecuadorian.. It is not a good idea to mess with a dominican :myman:


:krs: Yo, my man look like the black version of
maxresdefault.jpg


He needs to just cut the hair off:heh:
 

beanz

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
11,923
Reputation
2,420
Daps
25,215
Reppin
DR
ya so obviously just have some kind of beef or jealousy with dominicans on this forum that it isnt even worth discussing your fake outrage anymore.

i have been here 2 years and i swear on my unborn daughter's life, there has been AT LEAST 25 platinum anti-dominican threads on this shyt.

if it wasnt for that fact, i would pause and calmly discuss this shyt with ya the way @gonzo8402 been doing and the way i used to do. ya outrage is so fukking fake that it isnt even worth it tho.

27 page thread about dominicans enforcing a new immigration law and deporting haitians with a handful of instances of violence from ignorant ass country dominicans towards haitians.

but nobody gives a fukk about all the crazy violent shyt that happens in africa. like the anti-immigrant violence going on in south africa.

"no no. its ok. black people only commit atrocities against each other because of cacs. its not our fault.

unless u dominican. then u scum because well idk, sammy sosa n trujillo n shyt."

or what about the article about indentured servitude IN haiti?



"i wish somebody would pay for MY college to do some dishes" - actual paraphrased quote from some coli members


but if anybody with slightly less melanin does anything mean to black people

27 page platinum thread

:snoop:

i cant wait til i start my new job and dont have no time for this forum. right now shyt is just a disgusting habit i have when im bored like biting my nails or sticking my fingers down the crack of my ass to see what it smells like.

:dead:
 

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,110
Daps
7,059
Reppin
NULL
Breh, you're arguing that a law passed last year is foul because of what the DR did between 1999 and 2000 :why:

I'm confused by your position right now.
No, what I'm saying is D.R. has been proven to violate human rights, this law is just a new way for them to avoid going through that again, but I can bet someone will try to take them to court again. They just need time to build up a case.

Being that they already have human rights violations on their record, it makes it much easier to prove that the government is corrupt. If an investor has enough money, they can easily take over the island using the GUILTY verdict. I doubt the government will want to take the chance of being found guilty again, and that is how the country will be changed. You don't live there, so it really isn't bad for you, but for the poor people there, this law, the way it has caused to country to look, and the pass verdicts, all can be used to take over the country.
 
Top