Who do you WANT to win?


  • Total voters
    1,170

GzUp

Sleep, those slices of death; Oh how I loathe them
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,225
Reputation
6,645
Daps
56,781
Reppin
California
Whats the word on these GA ballots? When is the recount and how long will it take?

Got a bet being held up cause of Trump's BS :stopitslime:
Georgia

Local election officials must certify county results and send tallies to the secretary of state by Nov. 13. The secretary of state has until Nov. 20 to certify statewide results.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,466
Reputation
-34,327
Daps
618,057
Reppin
The Deep State
:ohhh::ohhh::ohhh::ohhh:

WOW

Schindler is saying Trump is making moves to cover up 2016 NSA PROOF OF HIS COLLUSION :whoo:




W3btT2q.gif


EDy4Ipe.gif


TRUMP IS TRYING TO COVER UP HIS COLLUSION IN 2016 ON THE WAY OUT THE DOOR!!!









https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...1d31a4-239d-11eb-a688-5298ad5d580a_story.html


A furious behind-the-scenes battle to counter Trump’s threat to national security
imrs.php

CIA Director Gina Haspel attends a Cabinet meeting at the White House in July 2019. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

Opinion by
David Ignatius
Columnist
November 10, 2020 at 6:23 p.m. EST
President Trump’s senior military and intelligence officials have been warning him strongly against declassifying information about Russia that his advisers say would compromise sensitive collection methods and anger key allies.

An intense battle over this issue has raged within the administration in the days before and after the Nov. 3 presidential election. Trump and his allies want the information public because they believe it would rebut claims that Russian President Vladimir Putin supported Trump in 2016. That may sound like ancient history, but for Trump it remains ground zero — the moment when his political problems began.

CIA Director Gina Haspel last month argued strongly at a White House meeting against disclosing the information, because she believed that doing so would violate her pledge to protect sources and methods, a senior congressional source said. This official said a bipartisan group of Republican and Democratic senators has been trying to protect Haspel, though some fear that Trump may yet oust her.

Rumors have been flying this week about Haspel’s tenure, but a source familiar with her standing as CIA director said Tuesday that national security adviser Robert C. O’Brien and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows had both “assured her that she’s good,” meaning she wouldn’t be removed. Haspel also met personally with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) Tuesday. She sees him regularly as a member of the “Gang of Eight” senior congressional leaders. But Tuesday’s visit was another sign of GOP support.

Haspel’s most unlikely defender has been Attorney General William P. Barr, who opposed a pre-election push to declassify the sensitive material, according to three current and former officials. At a showdown meeting at the White House, Barr pushed back against revealing the secret information.

Gen. Paul Nakasone, who heads U.S. Cyber Command and the National Security Agency, has also argued vehemently against disclosure, according to a senior defense official and the senior congressional source. Like Haspel, Nakasone took the unusual step of directly opposing White House efforts to release the intelligence, because he feared the damage that disclosure would cause.


President Trump fired Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper in a Nov. 9 tweet, marking the fourth Pentagon chief the president has let go during his administration. (Reuters)
The issue may have played a role in Trump’s surprise decision on Monday to fire Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper. According to the senior defense official, Esper wrote a letter last month to John Ratcliffe, the director of national intelligence, strongly endorsing Nakasone’s position and “urging that the information not be released due to the harm it would do to national security, including specific harm to the military,” the senior defense official said.

Trump’s ceaseless attempts to argue that the Russia investigation was a “hoax” — and to force the intelligence community to declassify information he believes would support this view — may animate some of his otherwise inexplicable moves.

At the Pentagon, Trump replaced Esper with acting defense secretary Christopher Miller, a former National Security Council official who had been nominated in March to run the National Counterterrorism Center. The job was vacant because Trump had fired Russell E. Travers, the previous acting NCTC chief, who had worked closely with former acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire, who was bounced in February. Maguire’s supposed crime was that he had allowed intelligence officials to brief Congress on Russian efforts to support Trump in the 2020 election.

At the NSA, the Trump team just installed as general counsel Michael Ellis, a former chief counsel to Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), a former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a locus of pro-Trump arguments that the Russia investigation was poisoned fruit. As the spy agency’s chief legal officer, Ellis could be an ally in a Ratcliffe-led campaign to declassify intelligence that would otherwise be tightly held because it might reveal sources and methods.

Senate Republicans, who might stop the post-election revenge campaign, face a growing tension between Trump’s demands and the country’s interests. The senior congressional source described it this way: “How much do you stay quiet during the tantrum period? What damage will it do to national security? That’s a real-time discussion that’s going on.”

Trump will depart the White House Jan. 20, barring an unlikely legal miracle. The question is how much damage he will do to national security before he leaves.







UYxFF2W.gif
 

Pedro Negro

Reefer & Sneakers
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,448
Reputation
660
Daps
6,645
Reppin
New York fukkin' City

:russ:

There's a house by me that has the flags and banners and all that garbage still flying. I keep waiting for them to take it down.

Since last Saturday, I make a point to cue up Bruce Springsteen's "Born in the USA" and blast it anytime I drive by there house, which is pretty often. :lolbron:
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2017
Messages
33,853
Reputation
7,968
Daps
183,405
:russ:

There's a house by me that has the flags and banners and all that garbage still flying. I keep waiting for them to take it down.

Since last Saturday, I make a point to cue up Bruce Springsteen's "Born in the USA" and blast it anytime I drive by there house, which is pretty often. :lolbron:

There’s a house I pass by every week that rotates the Republican elephant, Don’t tread on me, blue line, and Trump regularly. He still has the Trump flag up.

I saw him out there changing it one day, and he looked exactly how you’d expect.
 

Pedro Negro

Reefer & Sneakers
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,448
Reputation
660
Daps
6,645
Reppin
New York fukkin' City
There’s a house I pass by every week that rotates the Republican elephant, Don’t tread on me, blue line, and Trump regularly. He still has the Trump flag up.

I saw him out there changing it one day, and he looked exactly how you’d expect.

Yup, these people also have a rotation, even the pink Women For Trump one.

They even had a Trump 2020 jack-o'-lantern all lit up for Halloween. :why:
 

Dillah810

Flat Girther
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
43,552
Reputation
9,952
Daps
169,102
Reppin
Flint, Michigan
What's wrong with what Mr. Clyburn said?

What else would a veteran politician say publicly when asked that question?
Clyburn could have said he wanted Biden to pursue a specific policy Clyburn supports. Clyburn could even do the typical politician thing and said something vague like "I want Biden to make changes that will heal the nation" or some shyt like that. But to say you want nothing and are above a promise is the wrong answer.
 

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,940
Reputation
5,705
Daps
234,983
Clyburn could have said he wanted Biden to pursue a specific policy Clyburn supports. Clyburn could even do the typical politician thing and said something vague like "I want Biden to make changes that will heal the nation" or some shyt like that. But to say you want nothing and are above a promise is the wrong answer.
:mjlol:You not even trying to hide it anymore :lolbron:
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,144
Reputation
14,329
Daps
200,335
Reppin
Above the fray.
Clyburn could have said he wanted Biden to pursue a specific policy Clyburn supports. Clyburn could even do the typical politician thing and said something vague like "I want Biden to make changes that will heal the nation" or some shyt like that. But to say you want nothing and are above a promise is the wrong answer.
Both Clyburn and Biden are seasoned politicians. The real deals and agreements are brokered off camera. Rep. Clyburn will get exactly what he demanded in exchange for his endorsement.

I think he was thrown off by the audacity of the question.
 
Top