‘Poor Things’ | Official Teaser | Searchlight Pictures (Dir. by Yorgos Lanthimos) [12/8]

[Sonic Boom of the South]

Finally seen this.

This was just pure white women "yo go gurl", white women are victims, sex and gay sex wins Oscars, movie.

You can make the worst fukking movie but have lesbians fukking and white women talking about how they are done wrong and getting revenge on a man and the shyt getting awards.


This wasn't bad but this was the least interesting of all Yorgos Lanthimos films.

 

[Scustin Bieburr]

Finally seen this.

This was just pure white women "yo go gurl", white women are victims, sex and gay sex wins Oscars, movie.

You can make the worst fukking movie but have lesbians fukking and white women talking about how they are done wrong and getting revenge on a man and the shyt getting awards.


This wasn't bad but this was the least interesting of all Yorgos Lanthimos films.

I heard someone on a podcast describe it as "what if it was Frankenstein but the monster was jacking off and fukking" and that got me.

Apparently the ending in the book changes the story dramatically and for some baffling reason(I think the best case scenario is the director just has a fetish for the disabled. While the worst case scenario is....well yall know Hollywood and what it allows to happen to children ) that ending is absent from the film.

If this was meant to be a feminist story, cutting out the nudity but implying sex works to tell your story. Keeping it in serves little narrative purpose other than to say "look at how a child would fukk if it was in an adult's body" a sentence I feel disgusted at even typing.

In the book you learn that the story is

Spoiler

told from one character's point of view and that character is a hater so it puts the whole thing into question[/quote]

 

[Sonic Boom of the South]

I heard someone on a podcast describe it as "what if it was Frankenstein but the monster was jacking off and fukking" and that got me.

Apparently the ending in the book changes the story dramatically and for some baffling reason(I think the best case scenario is the director just has a fetish for the disabled. While the worst case scenario is....well yall know Hollywood and what it allows to happen to children )

If this was meant to be a feminist story, cutting out the nudity but implying sex works to tell your story. Keeping it in serves little narrative purpose other than to say "look at how a child would fukk if it was in an adult's body" a sentence I feel disgusted at even typing.

In the book you learn that the story is

Spoiler

told from one character's point of view and that character is a hater so it puts the whole thing into question

[/QUOTE]
To me this came off 100% like a white feminist, pervert for awards, movie.

 

[Professor K.]

This is the greatest piece of art I've ever experienced that I wouldn't recommend to or defend from criticism from anybody

 

[Json]

Visually interesting but this kind of felt like it wanted this to be some triumphant moment of autonomy and it wasn’t.

Just felt like people bumping into each other.

She had no idea who this dude was at the end so she just went off with him? If she has no allegiances to societal norms, tell him to buzz off and end the movie there.

Instead we just got more more moustachioed villainy for Bella to not be put in a true predicament


Overrated wanna be GDT world building.

 

[Lootpack]

 

[JamesJabdi]

has some funny moments, but this movie is way over the top with the sex scenes....like what on earth was that whole paris shyt

Emma Stone was showing bush, t*ts, used, abused and everything to the point i was like why is she doing this and she is married....add to that she is playing a child in a grown body and it becomes even more weird. Like what is this shyt