Planes, Trains and Automobile remake with Will Smith and Kevin Hart in the works.

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,040
Reputation
8,874
Daps
205,543
Reppin
NULL
giphy-11.gif
 

WHolla09

All Star
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
2,394
Reputation
378
Daps
5,803
Reppin
NULL
:jbhmm: I’m conflicted. On one hand, I love the original and I dislike remakes for the most part. However, I’m intrigued in Will Smith playing the Steve Martin role. I think Will would kill the part. I’m not sold on Kevin Hart all the way. He is probably the best, mainstream, Comedic actor to pull off this part. I’m not sold on his dramatic chops though. I can see him ruining the movie by being extremely corny. I can actually see Marlon Wayans killing this role. It just wouldn’t be mainstream enough for the studios though
 

Sunalmighty

Superstar
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
8,037
Reputation
1,790
Daps
19,379
Reppin
Oakland, Ca
Will and Denzel need to remake uptown Saturday night and Lets do it again.

These white folks are PISSED that they are remaking plane's, trains and automobiles
 

BXKingPin82

The Chairman of the Board will be... The Kingpin
Supporter
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
59,104
Reputation
13,542
Daps
199,374
Reppin
Bronx NY
All i know is, that Die Hart shyt is stooooopid!
:mjlol:

Travolta trollin the shyt outa Kev.
 

MartyMcFly

What's up doc, can we rock?
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
59,888
Reputation
9,232
Daps
161,056
Reppin
P.G. County
I'm saying the concept

The Robert Downey movie im talking about was called Due Date

About 2 guys trying to get home and RDJ wife was having a baby
Yeah due date is basically the new version of this movie. Much more mean spirited but it is that.

On the subject of a remake, I’m not against it on principle. Not against any remake on principle for real. If it’s done well I got a new movie to like. If it’s not I got a new movie to never think about again. No sweat off my back.

However, remaking movies that are the singular vision of one person is tough. This is a John Hughes movie through and through. It’s his perspective, his everything. Remaking a big studio movie with a cadre of writers or was just a work for hire, is easier to do. The problem when it’s something that’s so steeped in someone else’s voice is it’s easy to copy them in places but not really understand why. Choices are made just because they have to be made rather than fully understanding why. It’s why carpenter remakes haven’t worked; the people writing them or directing them don’t have a perspective of their own or something new to add to the story. They’re just doing whatever they do.

That’s why it’s easier to remake Friday the 13th than nightmare on elm street. Sean Cunningham and crew were just copying other people and wanted to do something to make money on the former. The latter was all Wes Craven’s inspiration. He took shyt from his childhood, research, and modern headlines and that’s what we got.

Doesn’t mean this will be bad. Doesn’t mean it will be good either. Just means they have a really fine line to walk and I hope the writer has a story she wants to tell that means a lot to her because Hughes’ flick has a lot of heart to it as well and it’s clearly personal.
 

Poetical Poltergeist

Precise and cold hearted
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
38,191
Reputation
5,847
Daps
124,195
Reppin
Mile in the Sky
I'm saying the concept

The Robert Downey movie im talking about was called Due Date

About 2 guys trying to get home and RDJ wife was having a baby
Concept is similar but two totally different movies in tone, execution and comedy. In other words Planes is classic and due date isn't.
 
Top